jclouds report

[Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com>]

hi Team,

I've added some notes to April's report at [1]

This is due by Apr 11 so please feel free to add/comment/amend as necessary.

Best,
Andrea

[1]:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JCLOUDS/2018+-+April+Board+Report+Draft

Re: jclouds report

[Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com>]

Excellent! Thank y'all guys!

I think I'll send today EOB (in ~7 hours)

Please feel free to amend/contribute more

Andrea

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:23 AM, Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks Andrea!
>
> I've added my edits. @demobiox feel free to rewrite-them as appropriate.
>
> Regarding the private tag, I've added the vendor mentions there. It is not
> a big deal. I mean, from a foundation perspective, when the board minutes
> are published (which include the project reports) it is good that there is
> no mention to companies that could be misunderstood as not being vendor
> neutral. Projects appear there all together and reports have no context
> directly available unless one goes to the mailing lists.
>
> However, our wiki is public and the mention in the private section can be
> read there. It is OK, as we always discuss this openly. We also have a test
> provider thanks page in the wiki, which is OK too.
>
> Internal stuff that should not be really disclosed, should be in private
> sections in the board report and definitely not in the wiki, but I think it
> is OK to mention the vendors here just as we do.
>
> On 10 April 2018 at 06:01, Andrew Phillips <ap...@qrmedia.com> wrote:
>
> > I've added some notes to April's report at [1]
> >>
> >
> > Thanks, Andrea! I've made some minor text edits, but the content overall
> > should be unchanged. One point regarding the paragraph about Dimension,
> 1&1
> > and Aliyun: there was some previous board feedback about how to refer to
> > companies in the public section of board reports, but I don't recall if
> the
> > guidance to mention companies by name in a <private> section only applied
> > to concerns, or to all company mentions in general.
> >
> > Ignasi, Andrew G., do you happen to recall what the advice there was?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > ap
> >
>

Re: jclouds report

[Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org>]

Thanks Andrea!

I've added my edits. @demobiox feel free to rewrite-them as appropriate.

Regarding the private tag, I've added the vendor mentions there. It is not
a big deal. I mean, from a foundation perspective, when the board minutes
are published (which include the project reports) it is good that there is
no mention to companies that could be misunderstood as not being vendor
neutral. Projects appear there all together and reports have no context
directly available unless one goes to the mailing lists.

However, our wiki is public and the mention in the private section can be
read there. It is OK, as we always discuss this openly. We also have a test
provider thanks page in the wiki, which is OK too.

Internal stuff that should not be really disclosed, should be in private
sections in the board report and definitely not in the wiki, but I think it
is OK to mention the vendors here just as we do.

On 10 April 2018 at 06:01, Andrew Phillips <ap...@qrmedia.com> wrote:

> I've added some notes to April's report at [1]
>>
>
> Thanks, Andrea! I've made some minor text edits, but the content overall
> should be unchanged. One point regarding the paragraph about Dimension, 1&1
> and Aliyun: there was some previous board feedback about how to refer to
> companies in the public section of board reports, but I don't recall if the
> guidance to mention companies by name in a <private> section only applied
> to concerns, or to all company mentions in general.
>
> Ignasi, Andrew G., do you happen to recall what the advice there was?
>
> Regards
>
> ap
>

Re: jclouds report

[Andrew Phillips <ap...@qrmedia.com>]

> I've added some notes to April's report at [1]

Thanks, Andrea! I've made some minor text edits, but the content overall 
should be unchanged. One point regarding the paragraph about Dimension, 
1&1 and Aliyun: there was some previous board feedback about how to 
refer to companies in the public section of board reports, but I don't 
recall if the guidance to mention companies by name in a <private> 
section only applied to concerns, or to all company mentions in general.

Ignasi, Andrew G., do you happen to recall what the advice there was?

Regards

ap