RE: Image Composition Analysis

["Smart,Dan" <Sm...@VMCMAIL.com>]

The ones that get through have bayes poison at the bottom.  It did hit a
couple of the SARE rules that look for bayes poison, but didn't score enough
to kill it.  

Very well crafted.

<<Dan>>


 

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Evan Platt [mailto:evan@espphotography.com] 
>  Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 4:53 PM
>  To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>  Subject: Re: Image Composition Analysis
>  
>  Smart,Dan said:
>  > Messagelabs made a big deal of their option of using First 4 
>  > Internet's Image Composition Analysis tool to detect pornographic 
>  > images.  Is anyone in the open source world working on something 
>  > similar.
>  >
>  > Catching image only E-mail with pornographic images is 
>  really difficult.
>  > My
>  > users are offended when they get one, and wonder how I 
>  could not catch it.
>  > Explaining that the document was text, filled with bayes 
>  poison, and 
>  > the one porn image with no porn words in the document 
>  doesn't seem to 
>  > have much of an impression on them.
>  
>  Well, I'm only a interested end user, not a admin, nor could 
>  I set up SA if my job depended on it, however I did assist 
>  in the configuration a year ago.... Isn't there a rule for 
>  something like "Image only" e-mails with no text in them? 
>  Modify that rule for additional points, so if a e-mail 
>  consists of a image only it will score higher. I mean 
>  granted, there will be the occasional message from their 
>  friend with "Here's a picture of my new son" that's possibly 
>  a FP, but that should be few and far between.
>  
>  Just my .02.
>  
>  Evan
>  
>