You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@iotdb.apache.org by "Alima777 (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/07/09 03:18:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1479) Remove one of tokenIntType and operatorType

Alima777 created IOTDB-1479:
-------------------------------

             Summary: Remove one of tokenIntType and operatorType
                 Key: IOTDB-1479
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1479
             Project: Apache IoTDB
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Alima777


At present, the division of labor between tokenIntType and operatorType is unclear, and the use of them is confused.

It's better to remove one of them. 

 

Related File: Operator.java



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1479) Remove one of tokenIntType and operatorType

Posted by Chao Wang <cc...@163.com>.
Yes，it's better to remove one of them. 
tokenIntType means PhysicalPlanType?




Thanks!


Chao Wang
BONC ltd
ccgowork@163.com
On 7/9/2021 11:18，Alima777 (Jira)<ji...@apache.org> wrote：
Alima777 created IOTDB-1479:
-------------------------------

Summary: Remove one of tokenIntType and operatorType
Key: IOTDB-1479
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1479
Project: Apache IoTDB
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Alima777


At present, the division of labor between tokenIntType and operatorType is unclear, and the use of them is confused.

It's better to remove one of them. 

 

Related File: Operator.java



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)