You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/12/14 07:00:26 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34066] -
[PATCH] Extension to binary Fields that allows fixed byte buffer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34066>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34066
chuck@manawiz.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #14515|0 |1
is obsolete| |
Attachment #14521|0 |1
is obsolete| |
------- Additional Comments From chuck@manawiz.com 2005-12-14 07:00 -------
Created an attachment (id=17219)
--> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17219&action=view)
Updated fixed binary field buffer patch for latest source with test case
Better late than never I hope. FixedBufferBinaryFields.patch is revised to
apply against the latest source and now includes a test case (extension of
TestBinaryDocument). This is my last current local patch to Lucene, so it
would be great if it gets committed. The value again is to eliminate copying
of large binary values to be stored in the Lucene index. For a compressed
document, for example, if the documents are read and compressed externally in a
fixed buffer and the compressed buffer is passed in, all copying can be
eliminated.
Chuck
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Disabling Lucene's Bugzilla
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:28 PM, karl wettin wrote:
> 14 dec 2005 kl. 15.09 skrev Erik Hatcher:
>
>> Infrastructure,
>>
>> We have long since migrated to JIRA as our issue tracker. Could
>> we get our Bugzilla disabled so no new issues or comments are added?
>
> do you mean disable or remove?
> i find old bugreports to be a good source of information.
>
> has all data in the bugzilla been migrated? if +1 else -1.
All data has been migrated. Since we were just informed that our
Bugzilla project is closed for new issues, only updates can occur,
I'm fine leaving Bugzilla alone. We'll just monitor it and catch any
issue that gets modified in Bugzilla.
Erik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Disabling Lucene's Bugzilla
Posted by karl wettin <ka...@snigel.net>.
14 dec 2005 kl. 15.09 skrev Erik Hatcher:
> Infrastructure,
>
> We have long since migrated to JIRA as our issue tracker. Could we
> get our Bugzilla disabled so no new issues or comments are added?
do you mean disable or remove?
i find old bugreports to be a good source of information.
has all data in the bugzilla been migrated? if +1 else -1.
--
karl
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: bugzilla@apache.org
>> Date: December 14, 2005 1:00:26 AM EST
>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34066] - [PATCH] Extension to binary
>> Fields that allows fixed byte buffer
>> Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
>> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
>> <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34066>.
>> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
>> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34066
>>
>>
>> chuck@manawiz.com changed:
>>
>> What |Removed |Added
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
>> Attachment #14515|0 |1
>> is obsolete| |
>> Attachment #14521|0 |1
>> is obsolete| |
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Additional Comments From chuck@manawiz.com 2005-12-14
>> 07:00 -------
>> Created an attachment (id=17219)
>> --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?
>> id=17219&action=view)
>> Updated fixed binary field buffer patch for latest source with
>> test case
>>
>> Better late than never I hope. FixedBufferBinaryFields.patch is
>> revised to
>> apply against the latest source and now includes a test case
>> (extension of
>> TestBinaryDocument). This is my last current local patch to
>> Lucene, so it
>> would be great if it gets committed. The value again is to
>> eliminate copying
>> of large binary values to be stored in the Lucene index. For a
>> compressed
>> document, for example, if the documents are read and compressed
>> externally in a
>> fixed buffer and the compressed buffer is passed in, all copying
>> can be
>> eliminated.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>> --
>> Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?
>> tab=email
>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Disabling Lucene's Bugzilla
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
Sander,
Thanks for that information. Since no new issues can be created,
we'll just monitor any comments ourselves and ask that folks use JIRA
instead.
Erik
On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:44 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2005, at 6:09 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
>> Infrastructure,
>>
>> We have long since migrated to JIRA as our issue tracker. Could
>> we get our Bugzilla disabled so no new issues or comments are added?
>
> Lucene in Bugzilla is already closed for bug entry. I realize that
> people can still edit existing bugs, and Bugzilla doesn't really
> have a mechanism to prevent that.
>
> If preserving the history in Bugzilla is not important to the
> project (for instance, in the case all bugs open and shut have been
> migrated to JIRA and the remaining Bugzilla content is therefore
> superfluous), I can just delete the product and that action should
> take the bugs with it.
>
> S.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Erik
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: bugzilla@apache.org
>>> Date: December 14, 2005 1:00:26 AM EST
>>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>> Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34066] - [PATCH] Extension to binary
>>> Fields that allows fixed byte buffer
>>> Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
>>> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
>>> <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34066>.
>>> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
>>> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>>>
>>> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34066
>>>
>>>
>>> chuck@manawiz.com changed:
>>>
>>> What |Removed |Added
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --------
>>> Attachment #14515|0 |1
>>> is obsolete| |
>>> Attachment #14521|0 |1
>>> is obsolete| |
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------- Additional Comments From chuck@manawiz.com 2005-12-14
>>> 07:00 -------
>>> Created an attachment (id=17219)
>>> --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?
>>> id=17219&action=view)
>>> Updated fixed binary field buffer patch for latest source with
>>> test case
>>>
>>> Better late than never I hope. FixedBufferBinaryFields.patch is
>>> revised to
>>> apply against the latest source and now includes a test case
>>> (extension of
>>> TestBinaryDocument). This is my last current local patch to
>>> Lucene, so it
>>> would be great if it gets committed. The value again is to
>>> eliminate copying
>>> of large binary values to be stored in the Lucene index. For a
>>> compressed
>>> document, for example, if the documents are read and compressed
>>> externally in a
>>> fixed buffer and the compressed buffer is passed in, all copying
>>> can be
>>> eliminated.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/
>>> userprefs.cgi?tab=email
>>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>>> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> sander@temme.net http://www.temme.net/sander/
> PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Disabling Lucene's Bugzilla
Posted by Sander Temme <sa...@temme.net>.
On Dec 14, 2005, at 6:09 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Infrastructure,
>
> We have long since migrated to JIRA as our issue tracker. Could we
> get our Bugzilla disabled so no new issues or comments are added?
Lucene in Bugzilla is already closed for bug entry. I realize that
people can still edit existing bugs, and Bugzilla doesn't really have
a mechanism to prevent that.
If preserving the history in Bugzilla is not important to the project
(for instance, in the case all bugs open and shut have been migrated
to JIRA and the remaining Bugzilla content is therefore superfluous),
I can just delete the product and that action should take the bugs
with it.
S.
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: bugzilla@apache.org
>> Date: December 14, 2005 1:00:26 AM EST
>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34066] - [PATCH] Extension to binary
>> Fields that allows fixed byte buffer
>> Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
>> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
>> <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34066>.
>> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
>> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34066
>>
>>
>> chuck@manawiz.com changed:
>>
>> What |Removed |Added
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
>> Attachment #14515|0 |1
>> is obsolete| |
>> Attachment #14521|0 |1
>> is obsolete| |
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Additional Comments From chuck@manawiz.com 2005-12-14
>> 07:00 -------
>> Created an attachment (id=17219)
>> --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?
>> id=17219&action=view)
>> Updated fixed binary field buffer patch for latest source with
>> test case
>>
>> Better late than never I hope. FixedBufferBinaryFields.patch is
>> revised to
>> apply against the latest source and now includes a test case
>> (extension of
>> TestBinaryDocument). This is my last current local patch to
>> Lucene, so it
>> would be great if it gets committed. The value again is to
>> eliminate copying
>> of large binary values to be stored in the Lucene index. For a
>> compressed
>> document, for example, if the documents are read and compressed
>> externally in a
>> fixed buffer and the compressed buffer is passed in, all copying
>> can be
>> eliminated.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>> --
>> Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?
>> tab=email
>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
--
sander@temme.net http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
Disabling Lucene's Bugzilla
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
Infrastructure,
We have long since migrated to JIRA as our issue tracker. Could we
get our Bugzilla disabled so no new issues or comments are added?
Thanks,
Erik
Begin forwarded message:
> From: bugzilla@apache.org
> Date: December 14, 2005 1:00:26 AM EST
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34066] - [PATCH] Extension to binary
> Fields that allows fixed byte buffer
> Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34066>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34066
>
>
> chuck@manawiz.com changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> Attachment #14515|0 |1
> is obsolete| |
> Attachment #14521|0 |1
> is obsolete| |
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From chuck@manawiz.com 2005-12-14
> 07:00 -------
> Created an attachment (id=17219)
> --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?
> id=17219&action=view)
> Updated fixed binary field buffer patch for latest source with test
> case
>
> Better late than never I hope. FixedBufferBinaryFields.patch is
> revised to
> apply against the latest source and now includes a test case
> (extension of
> TestBinaryDocument). This is my last current local patch to
> Lucene, so it
> would be great if it gets committed. The value again is to
> eliminate copying
> of large binary values to be stored in the Lucene index. For a
> compressed
> document, for example, if the documents are read and compressed
> externally in a
> fixed buffer and the compressed buffer is passed in, all copying
> can be
> eliminated.
>
> Chuck
>
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?
> tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org