[jira] [Commented] (ISIS-2490) @Property(auditing=EXCLUDED)

["Andi Huber (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-2490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17386001#comment-17386001 ] 

Andi Huber commented on ISIS-2490:
----------------------------------

For DomainObjects we have

{code:java}
Publishing entityChangePublishing()
            default Publishing.NOT_SPECIFIED;
{code}

I'd suggest for the Property annotation to go along with something like

{code:java}
Publishing propertyChangePublishing()
            default Publishing.NOT_SPECIFIED;
{code}


> @Property(auditing=EXCLUDED)  
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-2490
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-2490
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Daniel Keir Haywood
>            Assignee: Daniel Keir Haywood
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-M6
>
>
> We have removed @NotPersistable a while back, which had morphed into @Property(mementoSerialization=...) and become confused with/reused with the notion of being included in a snapshot.  And it seems explicit support to include/exclude a property from the audit logs has either got lost or was never implemented in the first place.
> To tease things apart, @Property(mementoSerialization=...) has in another ticket been renamed to @Property(snapshot=...)
> This ticket, then, is to properly introduce the notion that a property can be excluded from audit logs.  That will require the introduction of an AuditableFacet.  We can then also add support to exclude some types by default, specifically blobs/clobs (ISIS-1488).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)