You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jspwiki.apache.org by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> on 2010/11/11 05:03:33 UTC
Re: TLP tasks?
Sorry - I missed the reply.
The two items are:
"Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
and
"Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution
that is not under the Apache license, we have the right to combine
with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
Can we check those off? Are they why there hasn't been an official
Apache release?
Hen
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Henri,
>
> I think this kind of help would be very welcome to the project .
> The list of graduation tasks have been sitting there way too long, and to me
> itś unclear what exactly to do and in which order.
> And apart from that I currently do not have much spare time.
> I think we are missing some "ASF experience" here.
>
> So if someone could clarify a bit more what exactly should be done, that
> could help I think.
>
> Starting with the 2 items you mentioned, which ones do you mean, and can we
> close them ?
>
> kind regards,
> Harry
>
>
> 2010/9/19 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>
>> Great to hear :)
>>
>> Can the two items on the incubator check list be checked off then?
>>
>> While I don't think a release should be necessary (my opinion
>> anyway),having an alpha released seems useful, especially as the move
>> to TLP could be timed with the release of a beta and some PR.
>>
>> Is JSPWIKI-636 the last item for the alpha? (fixing tests)?
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Craig L Russell
>> <cr...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Henri,
>> >
>> > We're mostly done with incubation. The only real issue is that there has
>> > never been an official Apache-branded release of JSPWiki. There have been
>> > releases done "the Apache way" by the team, but they were not Apache
>> branded
>> > and were published outside the Apache infrastructure. So the group has
>> never
>> > gone through the rite of passage called "make an Apache release".
>> >
>> > Any insights you have are certainly appreciated.
>> >
>> > Craig
>> >
>> > On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm interested in helping out with JSPWiki, and I suspect I might be
>> >> more useful helping with any ASF issues than by simply diving into the
>> >> code.
>> >>
>> >> If I understand things correctly, the following is all that's needed
>> >> before JSPWiki can move to TLP?
>> >>
>> >> 1/ "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the
>> >> ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
>> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
>> >>
>> >> 2/ "Check and make sure that for all code included with the
>> >> distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the right
>> >> to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
>> >>
>> >> Are these still open?
>> >>
>> >> The actual TLP process move looks to be defined in the following 9 JIRA
>> >> issues:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310732&fixfor=12313986&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>> >>
>> >> Of that list, I would say that the following aren't blockers:
>> >>
>> >> * Clean unit test builds (JSPWIKI-636)
>> >> * Release 3.0.0-incubating-alpha-1 (JSPWIKI-461)
>> >> * Prepare a charter (JSPWIKI-538)
>> >>
>> >> For the last one, just declare a charter of "We abide by the Apache
>> >> bylaws". There's no reason you have to waste your energy creating new
>> >> rules unless you've found unique reasons to need them.
>> >>
>> >> Also, JSPWIKI-543 is post graduation. Infra takes care of a lot of this.
>> >>
>> >> Apologies for butting in if you're already all over this,
>> >>
>> >> Hen
>> >
>> > Craig L Russell
>> > Architect, Oracle
>> > http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
>> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Re: TLP tasks?
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Coming back to this, and because JSPWiki is the oldest podling without
the copyright item signed off; it seems to me that this can now be
signed off.
Do you concur Craig?
We can either put today or the date; or 14/Jun/08 as that's when
Alain's code was rewritten.
Hen
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Janne Jalkanen
<Ja...@ecyrd.com> wrote:
>
> There is no more Alain's code in JSPWiki 3.0. To the best of my knowledge, I rewrote all his contributions.
>
> /Janne
>
> On Nov 18, 2010, at 07:22 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Looks good. So just Alain listed as without a CLA?
>>
>> Any history on the attempt to contact him?
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> a long time ago, we (mostly Janne) started this page :
>>> http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing
>>>
>>> <http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing>is that the data you mean ?
>>>
>>> Harry
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/11/17 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> Thanks Harry; I've updated the website for the second one and set
>>>> 2009-08-16 as the completion date as it directly relates to
>>>> JSPWIKI-545.
>>>>
>>>> Which leaves us with the question of whether there were any
>>>> outstanding copyright holders on the pre-ASF JSPWiki who needed to
>>>> sign CLAs.
>>>>
>>>> Looking at the status page, it says that 'all active committers have
>>>> submitted a contributors agreement', as of 2007-10-15. So the question
>>>> remaining is who the inactive committers were.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone have that data? I don't know what JSPWiki looked like developer
>>>> community wise before it moved to the Incubator.
>>>>
>>>> Hen
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Henri,
>>>>>
>>>>> we created 28 JIRA issues for all graduation tasks. ( see
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa for the open
>>>>> issues)
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't comment on your first question, but the second one, I would think
>>>>> that is finished as noted in:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-545
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-589
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> Harry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/11/11 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry - I missed the reply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The two items are:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
>>>>>> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
>>>>>> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution
>>>>>> that is not under the Apache license, we have the right to combine
>>>>>> with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can we check those off? Are they why there hasn't been an official
>>>>>> Apache release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Henri,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think this kind of help would be very welcome to the project .
>>>>>>> The list of graduation tasks have been sitting there way too long, and
>>>> to
>>>>>> me
>>>>>>> itś unclear what exactly to do and in which order.
>>>>>>> And apart from that I currently do not have much spare time.
>>>>>>> I think we are missing some "ASF experience" here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So if someone could clarify a bit more what exactly should be done,
>>>> that
>>>>>>> could help I think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Starting with the 2 items you mentioned, which ones do you mean, and
>>>> can
>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> close them ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>>>> Harry
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2010/9/19 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Great to hear :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can the two items on the incubator check list be checked off then?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While I don't think a release should be necessary (my opinion
>>>>>>>> anyway),having an alpha released seems useful, especially as the move
>>>>>>>> to TLP could be timed with the release of a beta and some PR.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is JSPWIKI-636 the last item for the alpha? (fixing tests)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Craig L Russell
>>>>>>>> <cr...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Henri,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We're mostly done with incubation. The only real issue is that
>>>> there
>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>> never been an official Apache-branded release of JSPWiki. There
>>>> have
>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>> releases done "the Apache way" by the team, but they were not
>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>> branded
>>>>>>>>> and were published outside the Apache infrastructure. So the group
>>>> has
>>>>>>>> never
>>>>>>>>> gone through the rite of passage called "make an Apache release".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any insights you have are certainly appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm interested in helping out with JSPWiki, and I suspect I might
>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> more useful helping with any ASF issues than by simply diving into
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> code.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If I understand things correctly, the following is all that's
>>>> needed
>>>>>>>>>> before JSPWiki can move to TLP?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1/ "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
>>>>>>>>>> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project.
>>>> "
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2/ "Check and make sure that for all code included with the
>>>>>>>>>> distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the
>>>> right
>>>>>>>>>> to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are these still open?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The actual TLP process move looks to be defined in the following 9
>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310732&fixfor=12313986&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of that list, I would say that the following aren't blockers:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> * Clean unit test builds (JSPWIKI-636)
>>>>>>>>>> * Release 3.0.0-incubating-alpha-1 (JSPWIKI-461)
>>>>>>>>>> * Prepare a charter (JSPWIKI-538)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For the last one, just declare a charter of "We abide by the
>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>> bylaws". There's no reason you have to waste your energy creating
>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>> rules unless you've found unique reasons to need them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also, JSPWIKI-543 is post graduation. Infra takes care of a lot of
>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Apologies for butting in if you're already all over this,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>>>> Architect, Oracle
>>>>>>>>> http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
>>>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: TLP tasks?
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>.
There is no more Alain's code in JSPWiki 3.0. To the best of my knowledge, I rewrote all his contributions.
/Janne
On Nov 18, 2010, at 07:22 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> Looks good. So just Alain listed as without a CLA?
>
> Any history on the attempt to contact him?
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> a long time ago, we (mostly Janne) started this page :
>> http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing
>>
>> <http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing>is that the data you mean ?
>>
>> Harry
>>
>>
>> 2010/11/17 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Thanks Harry; I've updated the website for the second one and set
>>> 2009-08-16 as the completion date as it directly relates to
>>> JSPWIKI-545.
>>>
>>> Which leaves us with the question of whether there were any
>>> outstanding copyright holders on the pre-ASF JSPWiki who needed to
>>> sign CLAs.
>>>
>>> Looking at the status page, it says that 'all active committers have
>>> submitted a contributors agreement', as of 2007-10-15. So the question
>>> remaining is who the inactive committers were.
>>>
>>> Anyone have that data? I don't know what JSPWiki looked like developer
>>> community wise before it moved to the Incubator.
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Henri,
>>>>
>>>> we created 28 JIRA issues for all graduation tasks. ( see
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa for the open
>>>> issues)
>>>>
>>>> I can't comment on your first question, but the second one, I would think
>>>> that is finished as noted in:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-545
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-589
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Harry
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2010/11/11 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry - I missed the reply.
>>>>>
>>>>> The two items are:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
>>>>> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
>>>>> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> "Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution
>>>>> that is not under the Apache license, we have the right to combine
>>>>> with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we check those off? Are they why there hasn't been an official
>>>>> Apache release?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hen
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Henri,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think this kind of help would be very welcome to the project .
>>>>>> The list of graduation tasks have been sitting there way too long, and
>>> to
>>>>> me
>>>>>> itś unclear what exactly to do and in which order.
>>>>>> And apart from that I currently do not have much spare time.
>>>>>> I think we are missing some "ASF experience" here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So if someone could clarify a bit more what exactly should be done,
>>> that
>>>>>> could help I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Starting with the 2 items you mentioned, which ones do you mean, and
>>> can
>>>>> we
>>>>>> close them ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>>> Harry
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2010/9/19 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great to hear :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can the two items on the incubator check list be checked off then?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While I don't think a release should be necessary (my opinion
>>>>>>> anyway),having an alpha released seems useful, especially as the move
>>>>>>> to TLP could be timed with the release of a beta and some PR.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is JSPWIKI-636 the last item for the alpha? (fixing tests)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Craig L Russell
>>>>>>> <cr...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Henri,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We're mostly done with incubation. The only real issue is that
>>> there
>>>>> has
>>>>>>>> never been an official Apache-branded release of JSPWiki. There
>>> have
>>>>> been
>>>>>>>> releases done "the Apache way" by the team, but they were not
>>> Apache
>>>>>>> branded
>>>>>>>> and were published outside the Apache infrastructure. So the group
>>> has
>>>>>>> never
>>>>>>>> gone through the rite of passage called "make an Apache release".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any insights you have are certainly appreciated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm interested in helping out with JSPWiki, and I suspect I might
>>> be
>>>>>>>>> more useful helping with any ASF issues than by simply diving into
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> code.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If I understand things correctly, the following is all that's
>>> needed
>>>>>>>>> before JSPWiki can move to TLP?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1/ "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to
>>> the
>>>>>>>>> ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
>>>>>>>>> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project.
>>> "
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2/ "Check and make sure that for all code included with the
>>>>>>>>> distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the
>>> right
>>>>>>>>> to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are these still open?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The actual TLP process move looks to be defined in the following 9
>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310732&fixfor=12313986&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of that list, I would say that the following aren't blockers:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * Clean unit test builds (JSPWIKI-636)
>>>>>>>>> * Release 3.0.0-incubating-alpha-1 (JSPWIKI-461)
>>>>>>>>> * Prepare a charter (JSPWIKI-538)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For the last one, just declare a charter of "We abide by the
>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>> bylaws". There's no reason you have to waste your energy creating
>>> new
>>>>>>>>> rules unless you've found unique reasons to need them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, JSPWIKI-543 is post graduation. Infra takes care of a lot of
>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apologies for butting in if you're already all over this,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>>> Architect, Oracle
>>>>>>>> http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
>>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: TLP tasks?
Posted by Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>.
not that I know, the only component from Alain appeared to be the
IndexPlugin and that on was rewritten by Janne :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-246
regards,
Harry
2010/11/18 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
> Looks good. So just Alain listed as without a CLA?
>
> Any history on the attempt to contact him?
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > a long time ago, we (mostly Janne) started this page :
> > http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing
> >
> > <http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing>is that the data you mean
> ?
> >
> > Harry
> >
> >
> > 2010/11/17 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Thanks Harry; I've updated the website for the second one and set
> >> 2009-08-16 as the completion date as it directly relates to
> >> JSPWIKI-545.
> >>
> >> Which leaves us with the question of whether there were any
> >> outstanding copyright holders on the pre-ASF JSPWiki who needed to
> >> sign CLAs.
> >>
> >> Looking at the status page, it says that 'all active committers have
> >> submitted a contributors agreement', as of 2007-10-15. So the question
> >> remaining is who the inactive committers were.
> >>
> >> Anyone have that data? I don't know what JSPWiki looked like developer
> >> community wise before it moved to the Incubator.
> >>
> >> Hen
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Henri,
> >> >
> >> > we created 28 JIRA issues for all graduation tasks. ( see
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa for the
> open
> >> > issues)
> >> >
> >> > I can't comment on your first question, but the second one, I would
> think
> >> > that is finished as noted in:
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-545
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-589
> >> >
> >> > regards,
> >> > Harry
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2010/11/11 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> >> Sorry - I missed the reply.
> >> >>
> >> >> The two items are:
> >> >>
> >> >> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
> >> >> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
> >> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
> >> >>
> >> >> and
> >> >>
> >> >> "Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution
> >> >> that is not under the Apache license, we have the right to combine
> >> >> with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
> >> >>
> >> >> Can we check those off? Are they why there hasn't been an official
> >> >> Apache release?
> >> >>
> >> >> Hen
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Harry Metske <
> harry.metske@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Henri,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I think this kind of help would be very welcome to the project .
> >> >> > The list of graduation tasks have been sitting there way too long,
> and
> >> to
> >> >> me
> >> >> > itś unclear what exactly to do and in which order.
> >> >> > And apart from that I currently do not have much spare time.
> >> >> > I think we are missing some "ASF experience" here.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > So if someone could clarify a bit more what exactly should be done,
> >> that
> >> >> > could help I think.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Starting with the 2 items you mentioned, which ones do you mean,
> and
> >> can
> >> >> we
> >> >> > close them ?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > kind regards,
> >> >> > Harry
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2010/9/19 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Great to hear :)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Can the two items on the incubator check list be checked off then?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> While I don't think a release should be necessary (my opinion
> >> >> >> anyway),having an alpha released seems useful, especially as the
> move
> >> >> >> to TLP could be timed with the release of a beta and some PR.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Is JSPWIKI-636 the last item for the alpha? (fixing tests)?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hen
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Craig L Russell
> >> >> >> <cr...@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Hi Henri,
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > We're mostly done with incubation. The only real issue is that
> >> there
> >> >> has
> >> >> >> > never been an official Apache-branded release of JSPWiki. There
> >> have
> >> >> been
> >> >> >> > releases done "the Apache way" by the team, but they were not
> >> Apache
> >> >> >> branded
> >> >> >> > and were published outside the Apache infrastructure. So the
> group
> >> has
> >> >> >> never
> >> >> >> > gone through the rite of passage called "make an Apache
> release".
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Any insights you have are certainly appreciated.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Craig
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> I'm interested in helping out with JSPWiki, and I suspect I
> might
> >> be
> >> >> >> >> more useful helping with any ASF issues than by simply diving
> into
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >> code.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> If I understand things correctly, the following is all that's
> >> needed
> >> >> >> >> before JSPWiki can move to TLP?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> 1/ "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to
> >> the
> >> >> >> >> ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for
> the
> >> >> >> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the
> project.
> >> "
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> 2/ "Check and make sure that for all code included with the
> >> >> >> >> distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the
> >> right
> >> >> >> >> to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Are these still open?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The actual TLP process move looks to be defined in the
> following 9
> >> >> JIRA
> >> >> >> >> issues:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310732&fixfor=12313986&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Of that list, I would say that the following aren't blockers:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> * Clean unit test builds (JSPWIKI-636)
> >> >> >> >> * Release 3.0.0-incubating-alpha-1 (JSPWIKI-461)
> >> >> >> >> * Prepare a charter (JSPWIKI-538)
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> For the last one, just declare a charter of "We abide by the
> >> Apache
> >> >> >> >> bylaws". There's no reason you have to waste your energy
> creating
> >> new
> >> >> >> >> rules unless you've found unique reasons to need them.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Also, JSPWIKI-543 is post graduation. Infra takes care of a lot
> of
> >> >> this.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Apologies for butting in if you're already all over this,
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Hen
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Craig L Russell
> >> >> >> > Architect, Oracle
> >> >> >> > http://db.apache.org/jdo
> >> >> >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
> >> >> >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: TLP tasks?
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Looks good. So just Alain listed as without a CLA?
Any history on the attempt to contact him?
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> a long time ago, we (mostly Janne) started this page :
> http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing
>
> <http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing>is that the data you mean ?
>
> Harry
>
>
> 2010/11/17 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>
>> Thanks Harry; I've updated the website for the second one and set
>> 2009-08-16 as the completion date as it directly relates to
>> JSPWIKI-545.
>>
>> Which leaves us with the question of whether there were any
>> outstanding copyright holders on the pre-ASF JSPWiki who needed to
>> sign CLAs.
>>
>> Looking at the status page, it says that 'all active committers have
>> submitted a contributors agreement', as of 2007-10-15. So the question
>> remaining is who the inactive committers were.
>>
>> Anyone have that data? I don't know what JSPWiki looked like developer
>> community wise before it moved to the Incubator.
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Henri,
>> >
>> > we created 28 JIRA issues for all graduation tasks. ( see
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa for the open
>> > issues)
>> >
>> > I can't comment on your first question, but the second one, I would think
>> > that is finished as noted in:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-545
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-589
>> >
>> > regards,
>> > Harry
>> >
>> >
>> > 2010/11/11 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >> Sorry - I missed the reply.
>> >>
>> >> The two items are:
>> >>
>> >> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
>> >> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
>> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
>> >>
>> >> and
>> >>
>> >> "Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution
>> >> that is not under the Apache license, we have the right to combine
>> >> with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
>> >>
>> >> Can we check those off? Are they why there hasn't been an official
>> >> Apache release?
>> >>
>> >> Hen
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Henri,
>> >> >
>> >> > I think this kind of help would be very welcome to the project .
>> >> > The list of graduation tasks have been sitting there way too long, and
>> to
>> >> me
>> >> > itś unclear what exactly to do and in which order.
>> >> > And apart from that I currently do not have much spare time.
>> >> > I think we are missing some "ASF experience" here.
>> >> >
>> >> > So if someone could clarify a bit more what exactly should be done,
>> that
>> >> > could help I think.
>> >> >
>> >> > Starting with the 2 items you mentioned, which ones do you mean, and
>> can
>> >> we
>> >> > close them ?
>> >> >
>> >> > kind regards,
>> >> > Harry
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 2010/9/19 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>> >> >
>> >> >> Great to hear :)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Can the two items on the incubator check list be checked off then?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> While I don't think a release should be necessary (my opinion
>> >> >> anyway),having an alpha released seems useful, especially as the move
>> >> >> to TLP could be timed with the release of a beta and some PR.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Is JSPWIKI-636 the last item for the alpha? (fixing tests)?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hen
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Craig L Russell
>> >> >> <cr...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi Henri,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > We're mostly done with incubation. The only real issue is that
>> there
>> >> has
>> >> >> > never been an official Apache-branded release of JSPWiki. There
>> have
>> >> been
>> >> >> > releases done "the Apache way" by the team, but they were not
>> Apache
>> >> >> branded
>> >> >> > and were published outside the Apache infrastructure. So the group
>> has
>> >> >> never
>> >> >> > gone through the rite of passage called "make an Apache release".
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Any insights you have are certainly appreciated.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Craig
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> I'm interested in helping out with JSPWiki, and I suspect I might
>> be
>> >> >> >> more useful helping with any ASF issues than by simply diving into
>> >> the
>> >> >> >> code.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> If I understand things correctly, the following is all that's
>> needed
>> >> >> >> before JSPWiki can move to TLP?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> 1/ "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to
>> the
>> >> >> >> ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
>> >> >> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project.
>> "
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> 2/ "Check and make sure that for all code included with the
>> >> >> >> distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the
>> right
>> >> >> >> to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Are these still open?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The actual TLP process move looks to be defined in the following 9
>> >> JIRA
>> >> >> >> issues:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310732&fixfor=12313986&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Of that list, I would say that the following aren't blockers:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> * Clean unit test builds (JSPWIKI-636)
>> >> >> >> * Release 3.0.0-incubating-alpha-1 (JSPWIKI-461)
>> >> >> >> * Prepare a charter (JSPWIKI-538)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> For the last one, just declare a charter of "We abide by the
>> Apache
>> >> >> >> bylaws". There's no reason you have to waste your energy creating
>> new
>> >> >> >> rules unless you've found unique reasons to need them.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Also, JSPWIKI-543 is post graduation. Infra takes care of a lot of
>> >> this.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Apologies for butting in if you're already all over this,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Hen
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Craig L Russell
>> >> >> > Architect, Oracle
>> >> >> > http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> >> >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
>> >> >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: TLP tasks?
Posted by Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>.
a long time ago, we (mostly Janne) started this page :
http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing
<http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing>is that the data you mean ?
Harry
2010/11/17 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
> Thanks Harry; I've updated the website for the second one and set
> 2009-08-16 as the completion date as it directly relates to
> JSPWIKI-545.
>
> Which leaves us with the question of whether there were any
> outstanding copyright holders on the pre-ASF JSPWiki who needed to
> sign CLAs.
>
> Looking at the status page, it says that 'all active committers have
> submitted a contributors agreement', as of 2007-10-15. So the question
> remaining is who the inactive committers were.
>
> Anyone have that data? I don't know what JSPWiki looked like developer
> community wise before it moved to the Incubator.
>
> Hen
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Henri,
> >
> > we created 28 JIRA issues for all graduation tasks. ( see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa for the open
> > issues)
> >
> > I can't comment on your first question, but the second one, I would think
> > that is finished as noted in:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-545
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-589
> >
> > regards,
> > Harry
> >
> >
> > 2010/11/11 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Sorry - I missed the reply.
> >>
> >> The two items are:
> >>
> >> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
> >> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >> "Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution
> >> that is not under the Apache license, we have the right to combine
> >> with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
> >>
> >> Can we check those off? Are they why there hasn't been an official
> >> Apache release?
> >>
> >> Hen
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Henri,
> >> >
> >> > I think this kind of help would be very welcome to the project .
> >> > The list of graduation tasks have been sitting there way too long, and
> to
> >> me
> >> > itś unclear what exactly to do and in which order.
> >> > And apart from that I currently do not have much spare time.
> >> > I think we are missing some "ASF experience" here.
> >> >
> >> > So if someone could clarify a bit more what exactly should be done,
> that
> >> > could help I think.
> >> >
> >> > Starting with the 2 items you mentioned, which ones do you mean, and
> can
> >> we
> >> > close them ?
> >> >
> >> > kind regards,
> >> > Harry
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2010/9/19 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> >> Great to hear :)
> >> >>
> >> >> Can the two items on the incubator check list be checked off then?
> >> >>
> >> >> While I don't think a release should be necessary (my opinion
> >> >> anyway),having an alpha released seems useful, especially as the move
> >> >> to TLP could be timed with the release of a beta and some PR.
> >> >>
> >> >> Is JSPWIKI-636 the last item for the alpha? (fixing tests)?
> >> >>
> >> >> Hen
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Craig L Russell
> >> >> <cr...@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi Henri,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > We're mostly done with incubation. The only real issue is that
> there
> >> has
> >> >> > never been an official Apache-branded release of JSPWiki. There
> have
> >> been
> >> >> > releases done "the Apache way" by the team, but they were not
> Apache
> >> >> branded
> >> >> > and were published outside the Apache infrastructure. So the group
> has
> >> >> never
> >> >> > gone through the rite of passage called "make an Apache release".
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Any insights you have are certainly appreciated.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Craig
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> I'm interested in helping out with JSPWiki, and I suspect I might
> be
> >> >> >> more useful helping with any ASF issues than by simply diving into
> >> the
> >> >> >> code.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If I understand things correctly, the following is all that's
> needed
> >> >> >> before JSPWiki can move to TLP?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 1/ "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to
> the
> >> >> >> ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
> >> >> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project.
> "
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2/ "Check and make sure that for all code included with the
> >> >> >> distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the
> right
> >> >> >> to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Are these still open?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The actual TLP process move looks to be defined in the following 9
> >> JIRA
> >> >> >> issues:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310732&fixfor=12313986&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Of that list, I would say that the following aren't blockers:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> * Clean unit test builds (JSPWIKI-636)
> >> >> >> * Release 3.0.0-incubating-alpha-1 (JSPWIKI-461)
> >> >> >> * Prepare a charter (JSPWIKI-538)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> For the last one, just declare a charter of "We abide by the
> Apache
> >> >> >> bylaws". There's no reason you have to waste your energy creating
> new
> >> >> >> rules unless you've found unique reasons to need them.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Also, JSPWIKI-543 is post graduation. Infra takes care of a lot of
> >> this.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Apologies for butting in if you're already all over this,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hen
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Craig L Russell
> >> >> > Architect, Oracle
> >> >> > http://db.apache.org/jdo
> >> >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
> >> >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: TLP tasks?
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Harry; I've updated the website for the second one and set
2009-08-16 as the completion date as it directly relates to
JSPWIKI-545.
Which leaves us with the question of whether there were any
outstanding copyright holders on the pre-ASF JSPWiki who needed to
sign CLAs.
Looking at the status page, it says that 'all active committers have
submitted a contributors agreement', as of 2007-10-15. So the question
remaining is who the inactive committers were.
Anyone have that data? I don't know what JSPWiki looked like developer
community wise before it moved to the Incubator.
Hen
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Henri,
>
> we created 28 JIRA issues for all graduation tasks. ( see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa for the open
> issues)
>
> I can't comment on your first question, but the second one, I would think
> that is finished as noted in:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-545
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-589
>
> regards,
> Harry
>
>
> 2010/11/11 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>
>> Sorry - I missed the reply.
>>
>> The two items are:
>>
>> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
>> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
>> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
>>
>> and
>>
>> "Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution
>> that is not under the Apache license, we have the right to combine
>> with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
>>
>> Can we check those off? Are they why there hasn't been an official
>> Apache release?
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Henri,
>> >
>> > I think this kind of help would be very welcome to the project .
>> > The list of graduation tasks have been sitting there way too long, and to
>> me
>> > itś unclear what exactly to do and in which order.
>> > And apart from that I currently do not have much spare time.
>> > I think we are missing some "ASF experience" here.
>> >
>> > So if someone could clarify a bit more what exactly should be done, that
>> > could help I think.
>> >
>> > Starting with the 2 items you mentioned, which ones do you mean, and can
>> we
>> > close them ?
>> >
>> > kind regards,
>> > Harry
>> >
>> >
>> > 2010/9/19 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >> Great to hear :)
>> >>
>> >> Can the two items on the incubator check list be checked off then?
>> >>
>> >> While I don't think a release should be necessary (my opinion
>> >> anyway),having an alpha released seems useful, especially as the move
>> >> to TLP could be timed with the release of a beta and some PR.
>> >>
>> >> Is JSPWIKI-636 the last item for the alpha? (fixing tests)?
>> >>
>> >> Hen
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Craig L Russell
>> >> <cr...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Henri,
>> >> >
>> >> > We're mostly done with incubation. The only real issue is that there
>> has
>> >> > never been an official Apache-branded release of JSPWiki. There have
>> been
>> >> > releases done "the Apache way" by the team, but they were not Apache
>> >> branded
>> >> > and were published outside the Apache infrastructure. So the group has
>> >> never
>> >> > gone through the rite of passage called "make an Apache release".
>> >> >
>> >> > Any insights you have are certainly appreciated.
>> >> >
>> >> > Craig
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> I'm interested in helping out with JSPWiki, and I suspect I might be
>> >> >> more useful helping with any ASF issues than by simply diving into
>> the
>> >> >> code.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If I understand things correctly, the following is all that's needed
>> >> >> before JSPWiki can move to TLP?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1/ "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the
>> >> >> ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
>> >> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2/ "Check and make sure that for all code included with the
>> >> >> distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the right
>> >> >> to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Are these still open?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The actual TLP process move looks to be defined in the following 9
>> JIRA
>> >> >> issues:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310732&fixfor=12313986&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Of that list, I would say that the following aren't blockers:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> * Clean unit test builds (JSPWIKI-636)
>> >> >> * Release 3.0.0-incubating-alpha-1 (JSPWIKI-461)
>> >> >> * Prepare a charter (JSPWIKI-538)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> For the last one, just declare a charter of "We abide by the Apache
>> >> >> bylaws". There's no reason you have to waste your energy creating new
>> >> >> rules unless you've found unique reasons to need them.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Also, JSPWIKI-543 is post graduation. Infra takes care of a lot of
>> this.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Apologies for butting in if you're already all over this,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hen
>> >> >
>> >> > Craig L Russell
>> >> > Architect, Oracle
>> >> > http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
>> >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: TLP tasks?
Posted by Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>.
Henri,
we created 28 JIRA issues for all graduation tasks. ( see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa for the open
issues)
I can't comment on your first question, but the second one, I would think
that is finished as noted in:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-545
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-589
regards,
Harry
2010/11/11 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
> Sorry - I missed the reply.
>
> The two items are:
>
> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
>
> and
>
> "Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution
> that is not under the Apache license, we have the right to combine
> with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
>
> Can we check those off? Are they why there hasn't been an official
> Apache release?
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Henri,
> >
> > I think this kind of help would be very welcome to the project .
> > The list of graduation tasks have been sitting there way too long, and to
> me
> > itś unclear what exactly to do and in which order.
> > And apart from that I currently do not have much spare time.
> > I think we are missing some "ASF experience" here.
> >
> > So if someone could clarify a bit more what exactly should be done, that
> > could help I think.
> >
> > Starting with the 2 items you mentioned, which ones do you mean, and can
> we
> > close them ?
> >
> > kind regards,
> > Harry
> >
> >
> > 2010/9/19 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Great to hear :)
> >>
> >> Can the two items on the incubator check list be checked off then?
> >>
> >> While I don't think a release should be necessary (my opinion
> >> anyway),having an alpha released seems useful, especially as the move
> >> to TLP could be timed with the release of a beta and some PR.
> >>
> >> Is JSPWIKI-636 the last item for the alpha? (fixing tests)?
> >>
> >> Hen
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Craig L Russell
> >> <cr...@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi Henri,
> >> >
> >> > We're mostly done with incubation. The only real issue is that there
> has
> >> > never been an official Apache-branded release of JSPWiki. There have
> been
> >> > releases done "the Apache way" by the team, but they were not Apache
> >> branded
> >> > and were published outside the Apache infrastructure. So the group has
> >> never
> >> > gone through the rite of passage called "make an Apache release".
> >> >
> >> > Any insights you have are certainly appreciated.
> >> >
> >> > Craig
> >> >
> >> > On Sep 18, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I'm interested in helping out with JSPWiki, and I suspect I might be
> >> >> more useful helping with any ASF issues than by simply diving into
> the
> >> >> code.
> >> >>
> >> >> If I understand things correctly, the following is all that's needed
> >> >> before JSPWiki can move to TLP?
> >> >>
> >> >> 1/ "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the
> >> >> ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
> >> >> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
> >> >>
> >> >> 2/ "Check and make sure that for all code included with the
> >> >> distribution that is not under the Apache license, we have the right
> >> >> to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute. "
> >> >>
> >> >> Are these still open?
> >> >>
> >> >> The actual TLP process move looks to be defined in the following 9
> JIRA
> >> >> issues:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310732&fixfor=12313986&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
> >> >>
> >> >> Of that list, I would say that the following aren't blockers:
> >> >>
> >> >> * Clean unit test builds (JSPWIKI-636)
> >> >> * Release 3.0.0-incubating-alpha-1 (JSPWIKI-461)
> >> >> * Prepare a charter (JSPWIKI-538)
> >> >>
> >> >> For the last one, just declare a charter of "We abide by the Apache
> >> >> bylaws". There's no reason you have to waste your energy creating new
> >> >> rules unless you've found unique reasons to need them.
> >> >>
> >> >> Also, JSPWIKI-543 is post graduation. Infra takes care of a lot of
> this.
> >> >>
> >> >> Apologies for butting in if you're already all over this,
> >> >>
> >> >> Hen
> >> >
> >> > Craig L Russell
> >> > Architect, Oracle
> >> > http://db.apache.org/jdo
> >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
> >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>