Re: svn commit: r951696 - /ofbiz/branches/Dojo1.4/

[Adam Heath <do...@brainfood.com>]

jleroux@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jleroux
> Date: Sat Jun  5 12:05:50 2010
> New Revision: 951696
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=951696&view=rev
> Log:
> To replace our current Dojo version (I guess 1.2) with 1.4.
> There are number of syntax changes, hence the branch
> 
> Added:
>     ofbiz/branches/Dojo1.4/
>       - copied from r951695, ofbiz/branches/

I know this has already been fixed, by removing the branch, and
recreating, but please try to be careful in the future.  My git svn
has been busy for the last 3 hours, as it tries to recreate the
history for this orphaned branch.

ps: the problem here is that the branches folder itself was the base
of the branch, instead of trunk.

Re: svn commit: r951696 - /ofbiz/branches/Dojo1.4/

[Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>]

Yes sorry, a mistake in Subclipse :/

Jacques

From: "Adam Heath" <do...@brainfood.com>
> jleroux@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jleroux
>> Date: Sat Jun  5 12:05:50 2010
>> New Revision: 951696
>> 
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=951696&view=rev
>> Log:
>> To replace our current Dojo version (I guess 1.2) with 1.4.
>> There are number of syntax changes, hence the branch
>> 
>> Added:
>>     ofbiz/branches/Dojo1.4/
>>       - copied from r951695, ofbiz/branches/
> 
> I know this has already been fixed, by removing the branch, and
> recreating, but please try to be careful in the future.  My git svn
> has been busy for the last 3 hours, as it tries to recreate the
> history for this orphaned branch.
> 
> ps: the problem here is that the branches folder itself was the base
> of the branch, instead of trunk.
>