You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by Andrea Cosentino <an...@yahoo.com.INVALID> on 2014/12/16 17:06:40 UTC
New camel-cassandra component: Licenses doubt
Hi all,
I'm currently working on a new component: camel-cassandra.
This component will use: - Datastax Java Driver (Apache License 2.0)
and for unit testing - Cassandra-Unit
My doubt is related to this last project. This work is licensed under LGPL V 3.0 and should be very useful to have an embedded cassandra instance in the camel component test classes.
Is LGPL V 3.0 compatible with Apache License 2.0? From the GPL Compatibility on apache.org I'd say yes. Anyway I prefer to have an answer from the community.
The datastax java driver use the following compressor: LZ4Compressor, SnappyCompressor and DeflateCompressor as documentation reports.
Anyway this compressors use different licenses: LZ4Compressor have a new BSD license, while Snappy compressor use Apache License 2.0. At this moment I'm not including these libraries in the pom.xml, the only evidence of this is a Warning. Do you have any ideas on how to manage this situation?
Thanks a lot,Bye,Andrea Cosentino
Re: New camel-cassandra component: Licenses doubt
Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I’m not sure if we use LGPLv3 jar inside of Apache Camel, but we have camel-extra[1] to host the components which may not be hosted Apache Camel repository due to license issue.
[1]https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/?redir=1
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On December 17, 2014 at 12:07:14 AM, Andrea Cosentino (ancosen1985@yahoo.com.invalid) wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm currently working on a new component: camel-cassandra.
> This component will use: - Datastax Java Driver (Apache License 2.0)
> and for unit testing - Cassandra-Unit
> My doubt is related to this last project. This work is licensed under LGPL V 3.0 and should
> be very useful to have an embedded cassandra instance in the camel component test classes.
> Is LGPL V 3.0 compatible with Apache License 2.0? From the GPL Compatibility on apache.org
> I'd say yes. Anyway I prefer to have an answer from the community.
> The datastax java driver use the following compressor: LZ4Compressor, SnappyCompressor
> and DeflateCompressor as documentation reports.
> Anyway this compressors use different licenses: LZ4Compressor have a new BSD license,
> while Snappy compressor use Apache License 2.0. At this moment I'm not including these
> libraries in the pom.xml, the only evidence of this is a Warning. Do you have any ideas
> on how to manage this situation?
> Thanks a lot,Bye,Andrea Cosentino
>
Re: New camel-cassandra component: Licenses doubt
Posted by joef <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Regarding a Camel component for Cassandra, I've been working on such a
component. Check out camel-cql <https://github.com/joef551/camel-cql> .
Regards
Joe
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/New-camel-cassandra-component-Licenses-doubt-tp5760773p5761106.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: New camel-cassandra component: Licenses doubt
Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
No, it's not possible: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#category-x
Best,
Christian
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Andrea Cosentino <
ancosen1985@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I'm currently working on a new component: camel-cassandra.
> This component will use: - Datastax Java Driver (Apache License 2.0)
> and for unit testing - Cassandra-Unit
> My doubt is related to this last project. This work is licensed under LGPL
> V 3.0 and should be very useful to have an embedded cassandra instance in
> the camel component test classes.
> Is LGPL V 3.0 compatible with Apache License 2.0? From the GPL
> Compatibility on apache.org I'd say yes. Anyway I prefer to have an
> answer from the community.
> The datastax java driver use the following compressor: LZ4Compressor,
> SnappyCompressor and DeflateCompressor as documentation reports.
> Anyway this compressors use different licenses: LZ4Compressor have a new
> BSD license, while Snappy compressor use Apache License 2.0. At this moment
> I'm not including these libraries in the pom.xml, the only evidence of this
> is a Warning. Do you have any ideas on how to manage this situation?
> Thanks a lot,Bye,Andrea Cosentino
>
Re: New camel-cassandra component: Licenses doubt
Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I’m not sure if we use LGPLv3 jar inside of Apache Camel, but we have camel-extra[1] to host the components which may not be hosted Apache Camel repository due to license issue.
[1]https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/?redir=1
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On December 17, 2014 at 12:07:14 AM, Andrea Cosentino (ancosen1985@yahoo.com.invalid) wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm currently working on a new component: camel-cassandra.
> This component will use: - Datastax Java Driver (Apache License 2.0)
> and for unit testing - Cassandra-Unit
> My doubt is related to this last project. This work is licensed under LGPL V 3.0 and should
> be very useful to have an embedded cassandra instance in the camel component test classes.
> Is LGPL V 3.0 compatible with Apache License 2.0? From the GPL Compatibility on apache.org
> I'd say yes. Anyway I prefer to have an answer from the community.
> The datastax java driver use the following compressor: LZ4Compressor, SnappyCompressor
> and DeflateCompressor as documentation reports.
> Anyway this compressors use different licenses: LZ4Compressor have a new BSD license,
> while Snappy compressor use Apache License 2.0. At this moment I'm not including these
> libraries in the pom.xml, the only evidence of this is a Warning. Do you have any ideas
> on how to manage this situation?
> Thanks a lot,Bye,Andrea Cosentino
>