You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@deltaspike.apache.org by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> on 2013/03/11 11:28:14 UTC

org.apache.deltaspike.jpa.api.transaction.Transactional#qualifier

Hi,

Shouldn't org.apache.deltaspike.jpa.api.transaction.Transactional#qualifier
rather be @Qualifiers?

it doesn't make sense in JTA mode, the tx strategy could even validate it.

any reason why it was done this way?

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*

Re: org.apache.deltaspike.jpa.api.transaction.Transactional#qualifier

Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.

hi romain,

we will remove it soon.

regards,
gerhard



2013/3/11 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> Shouldn't org.apache.deltaspike.jpa.api.transaction.Transactional#qualifier
> rather be @Qualifiers?
>
> it doesn't make sense in JTA mode, the tx strategy could even validate it.
>
> any reason why it was done this way?
>
> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>