You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> on 2014/04/10 23:43:02 UTC
[DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Please place all discussion in this thread.
Thanks,
-Alex
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Steffi <ss...@interactive-pioneers.de>.
Hi Alex, Hi Eric,
thank you for testing the -marmotinni option.
I would vote for the -output option. It is more intuitive.
I wrote a ticket as OmPrakash Muppirala suggested:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34224
I also added a critical bug report. Please take a look:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34225
Regards,
Steffi
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Apache-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p36861.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Erik,
I wasn't sure why there isn't already an -output option for FlexJS. I had
trouble with the -marmotinni option when I was doing the functional tests.
It might have gotten dusty from lack of attention over the months.
If you don't have any objection to having an -output option, one of us can
add it, either in this release or the next one.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/14/14 1:09 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>I put in a param a while ago (used for testing) called '-marmotinni'; if
>you specify that with a file location following, FalconJX should output
>the
>JS to that directory instead of the default location...
>
>I've not tried this directly from the command line, only from the test
>platform's ant file, so mileage may vary ;-)
>
>If this is a blocker issue for you, I might be tempted to look a bit
>further into this and create a proper solution.
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>
>On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Steffi
><ss...@interactive-pioneers.de>wrote:
>
>> Hi OmPrakash Muppirala,
>>
>> I have tested a bit the the RC1.
>>
>> I was able to compile the DataBindingTest Example.
>> by only adding the extra parameter "-js-output-type=FlexJS"
>> This looks good so far.
>>
>> On the other hand I am a bit concerned about the output location.
>> I think users wish to set the output location where ever the like.
>> So maybe it would be nice if someting like "-output path"
>> would be recognized by the compiler.
>>
>> Regards
>> Steffi
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>>
>>http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Apac
>>he-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p36816.html
>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
>>Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Ix Multimedia Software
>
>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>3521 VB Utrecht
>
>T. 06-51952295
>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Hi Steffi,
On 4/23/14 6:42 AM, "Steffi" <ss...@interactive-pioneers.de> wrote:
>Hi Erik,
>
>
>Swcs:
>the FlexJS SDK contains several swcs. For the test project I use the
>following swcs:
>
> playerglobal.swc
> Halo.swc
> FlexJSJX.swc
> FlexJSUI.swc
> MXMLCClasses.swc
>
Halo.swc should not be use by FlexJS applications, but may be needed to
keep the compiler from complaining. If you can build without it, then it
is best to leave it out.
>Do you think this could be the default set for any FlexJS project.
>At FDT we plan to add a new project type for FlexJS projects.
>Any project type contains a default set of swcs.
That sounds great to me.
>
>Debugging:
>This problem occured during debugging of the SWF generated with FlexJS:
>The UI radio buttons (<basic:RadioButton>) are not clickable.
>They ignore any mouse interaction.
>Is there something missing in the DataBindingTest example?
There is a bug in radio button/checkbox that clicking on the actual
graphic does not work, but clicking on its label should work. Let us know
if clicking on the label does not work.
Thanks,
-Alex
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Steffi <ss...@interactive-pioneers.de>.
Hi Erik,
Swcs:
the FlexJS SDK contains several swcs. For the test project I use the
following swcs:
playerglobal.swc
Halo.swc
FlexJSJX.swc
FlexJSUI.swc
MXMLCClasses.swc
Do you think this could be the default set for any FlexJS project.
At FDT we plan to add a new project type for FlexJS projects.
Any project type contains a default set of swcs.
Debugging:
This problem occured during debugging of the SWF generated with FlexJS:
The UI radio buttons (<basic:RadioButton>) are not clickable.
They ignore any mouse interaction.
Is there something missing in the DataBindingTest example?
Regards,
Stephanie Swiderski
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Apache-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p37166.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
I put in a param a while ago (used for testing) called '-marmotinni'; if
you specify that with a file location following, FalconJX should output the
JS to that directory instead of the default location...
I've not tried this directly from the command line, only from the test
platform's ant file, so mileage may vary ;-)
If this is a blocker issue for you, I might be tempted to look a bit
further into this and create a proper solution.
EdB
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Steffi <ss...@interactive-pioneers.de>wrote:
> Hi OmPrakash Muppirala,
>
> I have tested a bit the the RC1.
>
> I was able to compile the DataBindingTest Example.
> by only adding the extra parameter "-js-output-type=FlexJS"
> This looks good so far.
>
> On the other hand I am a bit concerned about the output location.
> I think users wish to set the output location where ever the like.
> So maybe it would be nice if someting like "-output path"
> would be recognized by the compiler.
>
> Regards
> Steffi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Apache-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p36816.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
I think I have resolved FLEX-34224.
EdB
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Steffi <ss...@interactive-pioneers.de>wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> I have added two tickets. Please take a look:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34224
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34225
>
> And I can confrim I am working on FDT.
>
> Regards,
> Steffi
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Apache-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p36862.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Steffi <ss...@interactive-pioneers.de>.
Hi Om,
I have added two tickets. Please take a look:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34224
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34225
And I can confrim I am working on FDT.
Regards,
Steffi
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Apache-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p36862.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 14, 2014 10:41 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> OK, I commented on that issue. I'm not quite sure what they want.
>
Much appreciated! I hope the conversation you started should get things
moving.
Thanks,
Om
> -Alex
>
> On 4/14/14 11:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:19 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> ><bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Alex,
> >>
> >> One of the requests I got from FlashDevelop folks was a doc on IDE
> >> integration details for FlexJS. Would it be possible for you to put
> >> something like that together?
> >>
> >> Here is the ticket on FlashDevelop integration.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >>
> >This is the link to the ticket:
> >https://github.com/fdorg/flashdevelop/issues/70
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:12 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Steffi,
> >>>
> >>> We really appreciate the feedback. Just to confirm, this is on FDT,
> >>> right?
> >>>
> >>> Would be great if you filed a JIRA ticket for your request here [1]
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Om
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Steffi
> >>><ss...@interactive-pioneers.de>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi OmPrakash Muppirala,
> >>>>
> >>>> I have tested a bit the the RC1.
> >>>>
> >>>> I was able to compile the DataBindingTest Example.
> >>>> by only adding the extra parameter "-js-output-type=FlexJS"
> >>>> This looks good so far.
> >>>>
> >>>> On the other hand I am a bit concerned about the output location.
> >>>> I think users wish to set the output location where ever the like.
> >>>> So maybe it would be nice if someting like "-output path"
> >>>> would be recognized by the compiler.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Steffi
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> View this message in context:
> >>>>
> >>>>
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Ap
> >>>>ache-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p36816.html
> >>>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> >>>>Nabble.com.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
OK, I commented on that issue. I'm not quite sure what they want.
-Alex
On 4/14/14 11:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:19 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
><bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Alex,
>>
>> One of the requests I got from FlashDevelop folks was a doc on IDE
>> integration details for FlexJS. Would it be possible for you to put
>> something like that together?
>>
>> Here is the ticket on FlashDevelop integration.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>>
>This is the link to the ticket:
>https://github.com/fdorg/flashdevelop/issues/70
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:12 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Steffi,
>>>
>>> We really appreciate the feedback. Just to confirm, this is on FDT,
>>> right?
>>>
>>> Would be great if you filed a JIRA ticket for your request here [1]
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Steffi
>>><ss...@interactive-pioneers.de>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi OmPrakash Muppirala,
>>>>
>>>> I have tested a bit the the RC1.
>>>>
>>>> I was able to compile the DataBindingTest Example.
>>>> by only adding the extra parameter "-js-output-type=FlexJS"
>>>> This looks good so far.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand I am a bit concerned about the output location.
>>>> I think users wish to set the output location where ever the like.
>>>> So maybe it would be nice if someting like "-output path"
>>>> would be recognized by the compiler.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Steffi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>
>>>>http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Ap
>>>>ache-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p36816.html
>>>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
>>>>Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:19 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
<bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Alex,
>
> One of the requests I got from FlashDevelop folks was a doc on IDE
> integration details for FlexJS. Would it be possible for you to put
> something like that together?
>
> Here is the ticket on FlashDevelop integration.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
This is the link to the ticket:
https://github.com/fdorg/flashdevelop/issues/70
Thanks,
Om
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:12 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Steffi,
>>
>> We really appreciate the feedback. Just to confirm, this is on FDT,
>> right?
>>
>> Would be great if you filed a JIRA ticket for your request here [1]
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Steffi <ss...@interactive-pioneers.de>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi OmPrakash Muppirala,
>>>
>>> I have tested a bit the the RC1.
>>>
>>> I was able to compile the DataBindingTest Example.
>>> by only adding the extra parameter "-js-output-type=FlexJS"
>>> This looks good so far.
>>>
>>> On the other hand I am a bit concerned about the output location.
>>> I think users wish to set the output location where ever the like.
>>> So maybe it would be nice if someting like "-output path"
>>> would be recognized by the compiler.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Steffi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Apache-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p36816.html
>>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Alex,
One of the requests I got from FlashDevelop folks was a doc on IDE
integration details for FlexJS. Would it be possible for you to put
something like that together?
Here is the ticket on FlashDevelop integration.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:12 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
<bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Steffi,
>
> We really appreciate the feedback. Just to confirm, this is on FDT, right?
>
> Would be great if you filed a JIRA ticket for your request here [1]
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Steffi <ss...@interactive-pioneers.de>wrote:
>
>> Hi OmPrakash Muppirala,
>>
>> I have tested a bit the the RC1.
>>
>> I was able to compile the DataBindingTest Example.
>> by only adding the extra parameter "-js-output-type=FlexJS"
>> This looks good so far.
>>
>> On the other hand I am a bit concerned about the output location.
>> I think users wish to set the output location where ever the like.
>> So maybe it would be nice if someting like "-output path"
>> would be recognized by the compiler.
>>
>> Regards
>> Steffi
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Apache-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p36816.html
>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Steffi,
We really appreciate the feedback. Just to confirm, this is on FDT, right?
Would be great if you filed a JIRA ticket for your request here [1]
Thanks,
Om
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Steffi <ss...@interactive-pioneers.de> wrote:
> Hi OmPrakash Muppirala,
>
> I have tested a bit the the RC1.
>
> I was able to compile the DataBindingTest Example.
> by only adding the extra parameter "-js-output-type=FlexJS"
> This looks good so far.
>
> On the other hand I am a bit concerned about the output location.
> I think users wish to set the output location where ever the like.
> So maybe it would be nice if someting like "-output path"
> would be recognized by the compiler.
>
> Regards
> Steffi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Apache-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p36816.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Steffi <ss...@interactive-pioneers.de>.
Hi OmPrakash Muppirala,
I have tested a bit the the RC1.
I was able to compile the DataBindingTest Example.
by only adding the extra parameter "-js-output-type=FlexJS"
This looks good so far.
On the other hand I am a bit concerned about the output location.
I think users wish to set the output location where ever the like.
So maybe it would be nice if someting like "-output path"
would be recognized by the compiler.
Regards
Steffi
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Apache-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p36816.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Yup, forgot to commit it. Should be there now.
>
>
Looks good! I have notified the IntelliJ, FDT and FlashDevelop teams.
Hopefully they will participate in this RC testing.
Thanks,
Om
> On 4/10/14 3:19 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I don't see FlexJS 0.0.1 as one of the options when I open the Installer
> >3.0 RC7. Can you please add it so that we can invite the IDE folks to try
> >it?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:09 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> ><bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 4/10/14 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors
> >>>(IntelliJ,
> >>> >> FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in
> >>> the
> >>> >> packaging of FlexJS that it has a better chance of working and it
> >>> should
> >>> >> be easier to react to assumptions they are making.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >Should we wait until we (Apache Flex) approve the release? Or would
> >>>it
> >>> be
> >>> >better if they test the RCs as well?
> >>> I'd like them to try the RC. Based on what they find, we can decide
> >>>when
> >>> to make any changes. If it magically works it would be great to add to
> >>> the buzz.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Okay, I will get on it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Yup, forgot to commit it. Should be there now.
On 4/10/14 3:19 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I don't see FlexJS 0.0.1 as one of the options when I open the Installer
>3.0 RC7. Can you please add it so that we can invite the IDE folks to try
>it?
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>
>On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:09 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
><bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/10/14 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors
>>>(IntelliJ,
>>> >> FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in
>>> the
>>> >> packaging of FlexJS that it has a better chance of working and it
>>> should
>>> >> be easier to react to assumptions they are making.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >Should we wait until we (Apache Flex) approve the release? Or would
>>>it
>>> be
>>> >better if they test the RCs as well?
>>> I'd like them to try the RC. Based on what they find, we can decide
>>>when
>>> to make any changes. If it magically works it would be great to add to
>>> the buzz.
>>>
>>>
>> Okay, I will get on it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
I don't see FlexJS 0.0.1 as one of the options when I open the Installer
3.0 RC7. Can you please add it so that we can invite the IDE folks to try
it?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:09 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
<bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 4/10/14 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
>> >> FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in
>> the
>> >> packaging of FlexJS that it has a better chance of working and it
>> should
>> >> be easier to react to assumptions they are making.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >Should we wait until we (Apache Flex) approve the release? Or would it
>> be
>> >better if they test the RCs as well?
>> I'd like them to try the RC. Based on what they find, we can decide when
>> to make any changes. If it magically works it would be great to add to
>> the buzz.
>>
>>
> Okay, I will get on it.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/10/14 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
> >> FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in the
> >> packaging of FlexJS that it has a better chance of working and it should
> >> be easier to react to assumptions they are making.
> >>
> >>
> >Should we wait until we (Apache Flex) approve the release? Or would it be
> >better if they test the RCs as well?
> I'd like them to try the RC. Based on what they find, we can decide when
> to make any changes. If it magically works it would be great to add to
> the buzz.
>
>
Okay, I will get on it.
Thanks,
Om
> -Alex
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 4/10/14 2:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
>> FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in the
>> packaging of FlexJS that it has a better chance of working and it should
>> be easier to react to assumptions they are making.
>>
>>
>Should we wait until we (Apache Flex) approve the release? Or would it be
>better if they test the RCs as well?
I'd like them to try the RC. Based on what they find, we can decide when
to make any changes. If it magically works it would be great to add to
the buzz.
-Alex
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
> FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in the
> packaging of FlexJS that it has a better chance of working and it should
> be easier to react to assumptions they are making.
>
>
Should we wait until we (Apache Flex) approve the release? Or would it be
better if they test the RCs as well?
Thanks,
Om
> On 4/10/14 2:43 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> >Please place all discussion in this thread.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >-Alex
> >
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in the
packaging of FlexJS that it has a better chance of working and it should
be easier to react to assumptions they are making.
On 4/10/14 2:43 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>Please place all discussion in this thread.
>
>Thanks,
>-Alex
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 4/10/14 3:07 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 4/10/14 2:46 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB
>>4.7?
>> Yes. I found out that FB is actually using a 4.x number in the
>><version>
>> tag in the descriptor and doesn't try to parse the version in the
>> "description".
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>This is what I see in flex-sdk-description.xml:
>
><flex-sdk-description>
><name>Apache Flex (FlexJS) 0.0.1 FP11.1 AIR3.9 en_US</name>
><version>4.0.1</version>
><build>20140408</build>
></flex-sdk-description>
>
>I don't see a "description" element? Did you mean the "name"?
Yes. Sorry about that.
>
>If this is the case, how will it affect other IDEs?
That's what I want to find out.
>
>Will it be better if we add a new element called "flexjsversion" and set
>it
>to the real one for others to use?'
We'll see what they need, if anything.
-Alex
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/10/14 2:46 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB 4.7?
> Yes. I found out that FB is actually using a 4.x number in the <version>
> tag in the descriptor and doesn't try to parse the version in the
> "description".
>
> -Alex
>
>
This is what I see in flex-sdk-description.xml:
<flex-sdk-description>
<name>Apache Flex (FlexJS) 0.0.1 FP11.1 AIR3.9 en_US</name>
<version>4.0.1</version>
<build>20140408</build>
</flex-sdk-description>
I don't see a "description" element? Did you mean the "name"?
If this is the case, how will it affect other IDEs?
Will it be better if we add a new element called "flexjsversion" and set it
to the real one for others to use?'
Thanks,
Om
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 4/10/14 2:46 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB 4.7?
Yes. I found out that FB is actually using a 4.x number in the <version>
tag in the descriptor and doesn't try to parse the version in the
"description".
-Alex
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB 4.7?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Please place all discussion in this thread.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>