You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de> on 2016/11/18 10:20:20 UTC
Re: r1295006 and openhub
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:25:54AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:20:16PM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 22:36:39 +0000:
> > > Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 23:22:22 +0200:
> > > > Reading our openhub stats for fun I noticed that the stats
> > > > are totally screwed. It seems they stop scanning our history
> > > > at r1295006 (the infamous commit that changed our trunk's copy ID).
> >
> > I've reached out to a Black Duck contact of Erik's. (Thanks Erik.)
>
> Thank you Daniel!
Hi Daniel,
Was there any follow-up on this?
https://www.openhub.net/p/subversion still states the first commit
to the project happened in Feb 2012, while our repository history
actually does back all the way to Karl Fogel's first commit in
March 2000: https://svn.apache.org/r836421
The blackduck openhub stats are missing out on 12 years of history
and are severely misrepresenting a lot of people's contributions.
Thanks,
Stefan
Re: r1295006 and openhub
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:59:36 +0000:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:20:20 +0100:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:25:54AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:20:16PM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 22:36:39 +0000:
> > > > > Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 23:22:22 +0200:
> > > > > > Reading our openhub stats for fun I noticed that the stats
> > > > > > are totally screwed. It seems they stop scanning our history
> > > > > > at r1295006 (the infamous commit that changed our trunk's copy ID).
> > > >
> > > > I've reached out to a Black Duck contact of Erik's. (Thanks Erik.)
> > >
> > > Thank you Daniel!
> >
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Was there any follow-up on this?
> >
>
> My email was ack'ed on the same day (by a human, not an autoresponse),
> but I have heard nothing since. I just followed up with a ping. Will
> keep you posted.
It is being worked on.
Re: r1295006 and openhub
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:20:20 +0100:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:25:54AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:20:16PM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 22:36:39 +0000:
> > > > Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 23:22:22 +0200:
> > > > > Reading our openhub stats for fun I noticed that the stats
> > > > > are totally screwed. It seems they stop scanning our history
> > > > > at r1295006 (the infamous commit that changed our trunk's copy ID).
> > >
> > > I've reached out to a Black Duck contact of Erik's. (Thanks Erik.)
> >
> > Thank you Daniel!
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Was there any follow-up on this?
>
My email was ack'ed on the same day (by a human, not an autoresponse),
but I have heard nothing since. I just followed up with a ping. Will
keep you posted.