You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by Michael Schuerig <mi...@schuerig.de> on 2005/02/23 13:01:25 UTC
Defining a dependency on the JDK's tools.jar?
Here's what I cobbled together
project.xml:
<dependency>
<groupId>jdk</groupId>
<artifactId>tools</artifactId>
<type>jar</type>
</dependency>
project.properties:
maven.jar.override=on
maven.jar.tools=${java.home}/../lib/tools.jar
This isn't exactly elegant. So, is there a better, cleaner way?
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig Failures to use one's frontal lobes
mailto:michael@schuerig.de can result in the loss of them.
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/ --William H. Calvin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
RE: Defining a dependency on the JDK's tools.jar?
Posted by Vincent Massol <vm...@pivolis.com>.
Hi Michael,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Schuerig [mailto:michael@schuerig.de]
> Sent: mercredi 23 février 2005 13:01
> To: users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Defining a dependency on the JDK's tools.jar?
>
>
> Here's what I cobbled together
>
> project.xml:
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>jdk</groupId>
> <artifactId>tools</artifactId>
> <type>jar</type>
> </dependency>
>
> project.properties:
>
> maven.jar.override=on
> maven.jar.tools=${java.home}/../lib/tools.jar
>
> This isn't exactly elegant. So, is there a better, cleaner way?
Yep, using the ${tools.jar} default Maven property. I don't think you really
wish to download it so there's no need to define it as a dependency. Having
a JDK installed is meant to be a prereq.
-Vincent
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org