You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by ji...@codehaus.org on 2003/10/17 16:30:04 UTC

[jira] Created: (MAVEN-944) Display status of inclusion in remote Maven repository on generated dependency page

Message:

  A new issue has been created in JIRA.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:

  http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-944


Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
        Key: MAVEN-944
    Summary: Display status of inclusion in remote Maven repository on generated dependency page
       Type: Improvement

     Status: Unassigned
   Priority: Trivial

 Time Spent: Unknown
  Remaining: Unknown

    Project: maven
 Components: 
             plugin-site
   Versions:
             1.0-beta-10

   Assignee: 
   Reporter: Charlie Dobbie

    Created: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 9:29 AM
    Updated: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 9:29 AM

Description:
My project contains several dependencies that are not yet (or never will be) available from ibiblio.  It would be useful to have an indication on the dependency page to distinguish these entries.

As each environment has its own opinion of where dependencies come from, and thus what is and isn't "custom", this would require a property named something like "maven.repo.remote.official" to store the project's opinion of standard repository locations.


I can see this being implemented in one of two different ways:

1) At time of page generation, check whether each dependency exists in one of the official/standard repository locations.  If in off-line mode, don't check and don't render any indication.

2) At time of dependency download, store extra information in the local repository detailing where the file came from.  At page generation time, check these values instead.


The first option is quick and easy, but requires network access which will slow a build down.  The second option is more "correct", but requires a (minor) change to a core Maven process.  The second option may become out-of-sync with reality if a "custom" library is added - the local repository wouldn't be aware of this.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org