[Friday] (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?)

[Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>]

and tons of beer :-)

On 2/23/07, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's Weisswurst we ate! and a lot of that stuff.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 2/23/07, Jeff Bischoff <jb...@klkurz.com> wrote:
> > I saw that post at the time, but figured it was the result of too much
> > doppelbock and wienerschnitzel. ;)
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > Well... there was a meeting in munich, during the october fest...
> > > and they discussed that...
> > >
> > > http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Projects/JSFDaysMunich2006
> > >
> > > *snip*
> > > Version synchronization. JSF 2.0 renamed JSF 6 to go with Java EE 6.
> > >
> > > perhaps it was the beer ;)))
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/23/07, Dennis Byrne <de...@dbyrne.net> wrote:
> > >> 6.0?  Seriously?
> > >>
> > >> Dennis Byrne
> > >>
> > >> On 2/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> > there was a wiki page which says that they want to have the next
> > >> > version of jsf (2.0)
> > >> > named 6.0
> > >> > so... I am not really seeing any reason to go from myfaces 1.2 to a
> > >> 6 ...
> > >> >
> > >> > :-)
> > >> >
> > >> > On 2/23/07, Dennis Byrne < dennis@dbyrne.net> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >    JSF 1.1 -> MyFaces 1.x
> > >> > > >    JSF 1.2 -> MyFaces 2.x
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I'd rather keep the release numbers in sync with the spec numbers.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > 1.1 -> 1.1.x,
> > >> > > 1.2 -> 1.2.x
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Paul Spencer
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > >> > > > > we sould do the same for core
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > next is 1.5.0
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > and JSF 1.2 stuff should be changed to 2.0.0
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >> 1.5.0 or 1.6.0. One is as good as the other IMO.
> > >> > > > >> You mean 1.6.0 is better because it does not "match" the
> > >> 1.1.5 of
> > >> > > > >> current core?
> > >> > > > >> I think Martin suggested 1.5.0 because it would be in the
> > >> style of
> > >> > > > >> Tomcat 5.0.x vs Tomcat 5.5.x, right?
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> --Manfred
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> On 2/23/07, Paul Spencer < paulsp@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> > > > >> > If the version of Tomahawk is not tied to the version of
> > >> MyFaces,
> > >> > > then
> > >> > > > >> > how about the NEXT version of Tomahawk be 1.6?
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > This would allow Tomahawk, like Tobago, to be version
> > >> independently
> > >> > > > >> of MyFaces.
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > Paul Spencer
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > >> > > > >> > > slightly too late, but 1.1.5 would have been my option as
> > >> well.
> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > >> > > other option: 1.5 - and let tomahawk and impl version
> > >> numbers
> > >> get
> > >> > > > >> out of
> > >> > > > >> > > sync.
> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > >> > > regards,
> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > >> > > Martin
> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > >> > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > >> > >> Ok, thanks for your feedback.
> > >> > > > >> > >> Branch 1.1.5 created.
> > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > >> > >> --Manfred
> > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > >> > >> On 2/23/07, Wendy Smoak < wsmoak@gmail.com > wrote:
> > >> > > > >> > >> > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > >> > >> > > The new tomahawk release number is a trade-off.
> > >> > > > >> > >> > > We must decide between
> > >> > > > >> > >> > >  - releasing tomahawk 1.1.4 which is not compatible to
> > >> core
> > >> > > > >> 1.1.4 and
> > >> > > > >> > >> > > therefore might confuse users
> > >> > > > >> > >> > >  - skipping tomahawk 1.1.4, stay in sync with core and
> > >> have a
> > >> > > > >> > >> tomahawk
> > >> > > > >> > >> > > 1.1.5 that is 100% compatible to the current core 1.1.5
> > >> > > > >> > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > >> > +1 for Tomahawk 1.1.5 this time around, which will be
> > >> > > > >> compatible with
> > >> > > > >> > >> > Core 1.1.5.
> > >> > > > >> > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > >> > (There is plenty of information in the archives if anyone
> > >> asks
> > >> > > > >> "what
> > >> > > > >> > >> > happened" to 1.1.4.  As Paul points out, Tomcat skips
> > >> version
> > >> > > > >> numbers
> > >> > > > >> > >> > in their public release series.)
> > >> > > > >> > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > >> > --
> > >> > > > >> > >> > Wendy
> > >> > > > >> > >> >
> > >> > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >> >
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Dennis Byrne
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >> > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> > >> >
> > >> > further stuff:
> > >> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > >> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Dennis Byrne
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com