You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@spamassassin.apache.org by ax...@apache.org on 2014/10/29 00:18:33 UTC

svn commit: r1635005 - in /spamassassin/trunk/rules: 50_scores.cf 60_whitelist.cf

Author: axb
Date: Tue Oct 28 23:18:33 2014
New Revision: 1635005

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1635005
Log:
added missing eval:check_uri_host_in_* rules

Modified:
    spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf
    spamassassin/trunk/rules/60_whitelist.cf

Modified: spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf?rev=1635005&r1=1635004&r2=1635005&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf (original)
+++ spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf Tue Oct 28 23:18:33 2014
@@ -704,7 +704,11 @@ ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WLB
 score USER_IN_BLACKLIST 100.000
 score USER_IN_WHITELIST -100.000
 score USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST -15.000
-score USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO 10.000
+score USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO   10.000
+score URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST  100.0
+score URI_HOST_IN_WHITELIST -100.0
+score HEADER_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST	100.0
+score HEADER_HOST_IN_WHITELIST -100.0
 
 # not really false positives but the user wants spam!
 score USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO -6.000

Modified: spamassassin/trunk/rules/60_whitelist.cf
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/60_whitelist.cf?rev=1635005&r1=1635004&r2=1635005&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- spamassassin/trunk/rules/60_whitelist.cf (original)
+++ spamassassin/trunk/rules/60_whitelist.cf Tue Oct 28 23:18:33 2014
@@ -11,9 +11,9 @@
 # The ASF licenses this file to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0
 # (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
 # the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at:
-# 
+#
 #     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
-# 
+#
 # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
@@ -59,6 +59,22 @@ header USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO      eval:che
 describe USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO    User is listed in 'all_spam_to'
 tflags USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO      userconf nice noautolearn
 
+body      URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST eval:check_uri_host_in_blacklist()
+describe  URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST domain is in the URL's black-list
+tflags    URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST userconf noautolearn
+
+body      URI_HOST_IN_WHITELIST eval:check_uri_host_in_whitelist()
+describe  URI_HOST_IN_WHITELIST domain is in the URL's white-list
+tflags    URI_HOST_IN_WHITELIST userconf noautolearn
+
+header 	  HEADER_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST eval:check_uri_host_listed('BLACK')
+describe  HEADER_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST Blacklisted header host or domain
+tflags    HEADER_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST userconf noautolearn
+
+header 	  HEADER_HOST_IN_WHITELIST eval:check_uri_host_listed('WHITE')
+describe  HEADER_HOST_IN_WHITELIST Whitelisted header host or domain
+tflags    HEADER_HOST_IN_WHITELIST userconf noautolearn
+
 ###########################################################################
 # Default whitelists.  These should be addresses which send mail that is often
 # tagged (incorrectly) as spam; it also helps that they be addresses of big