[jira] Commented: (DIRSERVER-644) Memory Leak in Persistent search ?

["Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733855#action_12733855 ] 

Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSERVER-644:
---------------------------------------------

The initial issue has been fixed when we moved to cursor implementation.

> Memory Leak in Persistent search ?
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-644
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-644
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.4, 1.0-RC3
>            Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
>            Assignee: Emmanuel Lecharny
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.5.5
>
>         Attachments: SearchTest.java
>
>
> After having profiled memory, it seems we have a memory leak in SessionRegistry.
> A little test (attached) does a search N times for N threads, and for each search, a OutstandingRequest is attached to the session. After a few thousands of search we fall in OOM. I've put some trace in those methods :
> SessionRegistry.addOutstandingRequest
> and
> SessionRegistry.removeOutstandingRequest
> Session Released
> addOutstandingRequest 2
> addOutstandingRequest 3
> addOutstandingRequest 4
> ... ( 100 requests)
> addOutstandingRequest 99
> addOutstandingRequest 100
> addOutstandingRequest 101
> remove session
> The SessionRegistry.removeOutstandingRequest is never called, except if an exception is raised (NamingException). 
> It may be on purpose ( persistent search), but we can't assume the server will be able to hold as many OutstandingRequest as we have search requests - or entries -.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.