You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> on 2013/09/04 17:34:50 UTC
Jackson version
Hi All:
Can we have a comment in the main POM as to why we are using an old version
of Jackson (1.9) instead of the current version (2.x)?
Thank you,
Gary
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: Jackson version
Posted by Nick Williams <ni...@nicholaswilliams.net>.
See this thread: http://log4j.markmail.org/thread/23z6w6m6sbwipwff
Particularly this message in the thread: http://log4j.markmail.org/thread/23z6w6m6sbwipwff#query:+page:1+mid:uomsjxd6m6zzqkox+state:results
And this message: http://log4j.markmail.org/thread/23z6w6m6sbwipwff#query:+page:1+mid:mxqwrtvvoi5zfb6f+state:results
N
On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Actually, it looks like both 1.9 and 2.2 versions are used in different parts of the POM... I 'm not sure why...
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Can we have a comment in the main POM as to why we are using an old version of Jackson (1.9) instead of the current version (2.x)?
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
> Spring Batch in Action
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
> Spring Batch in Action
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: Jackson version
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
Actually, it looks like both 1.9 and 2.2 versions are used in different
parts of the POM... I 'm not sure why...
Gary
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Can we have a comment in the main POM as to why we are using an old
> version of Jackson (1.9) instead of the current version (2.x)?
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory