You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Weihao Li <wl...@aware.com> on 2020/08/26 14:01:32 UTC
ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
Hi,
Sorry if this is not the correct mailing list.
We are loyal Active MQ users for many years and we notice ActiveMQ Artemis is released and we plan to migrate ActiveMQ 5 to ActiveMQ Artemis in the future. But seems like ActiveMQ Artemis haven't reached the sufficient level of feature with the 5.x code-base. Thus, we want to get some information about the roadmap of ActiveMQ Artemis so that we can schedule the migration work.
Thanks,
Weihao Li
Senior Software Engineer Aware, Inc.
wli@aware.com<ma...@aware.com>
P. 781.687.0478
40 Middlesex Turnpike
Bedford, MA 01730
Main. 781-276-4000
www.aware.com<http://www.aware.com/>
Connect with Aware:
Web<https://www.aware.com/> | Blog<https://www.aware.com/blog/> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/awarebiometrics> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/aware-inc.>
Re: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
Check out the roadmap [1]. A *lot* of work has been done since this topic
was last discussed on the mailing list. At this point I think most, if not
all, of the features which aren't yet implemented are probably unnecessary.
As Gary mentioned, please elaborate on what features you still need (if
any).
Justin
[1] https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-artemis-roadmap
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 9:23 AM Weihao Li <wl...@aware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if this is not the correct mailing list.
>
> We are loyal Active MQ users for many years and we notice ActiveMQ Artemis
> is released and we plan to migrate ActiveMQ 5 to ActiveMQ Artemis in the
> future. But seems like ActiveMQ Artemis haven't reached the sufficient
> level of feature with the 5.x code-base. Thus, we want to get some
> information about the roadmap of ActiveMQ Artemis so that we can schedule
> the migration work.
>
> Thanks,
> Weihao Li
> Senior Software Engineer Aware, Inc.
>
> wli@aware.com<ma...@aware.com>
> P. 781.687.0478
>
> 40 Middlesex Turnpike
> Bedford, MA 01730
> Main. 781-276-4000
> www.aware.com<http://www.aware.com/>
> Connect with Aware:
> Web<https://www.aware.com/> | Blog<https://www.aware.com/blog/> | Twitter<
> https://twitter.com/awarebiometrics> | LinkedIn<
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/aware-inc.>
>
>
Re: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
I work for a company that supports customers using both ActiveMQ 5.x and
Artemis based products. However, I can't provide customer details. Others
on this list who are using Artemis in production may speak up, of course,
and provide the details you're looking for.
When you say "large scale" what exactly do you mean? Do you mean in terms
of message volume, message size, cluster size, hardware capacity, etc.?
Justin
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:02 AM Weihao Li <wl...@aware.com> wrote:
> Good to know it. May I know which companies that are using Artemis in
> production now? I am interested to know if anyone is using in large scale.
>
> Thanks,
> Weihao Li
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 1:24 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
>
> As far as stability and "robustness" goes ActiveMQ Artemis is already
> production ready (and has been for a long time). The timeline for becoming
> ActiveMQ 6 is based on sufficient feature parity with the 5.x code-base,
> not general stability or production readiness. Lots of users have deployed
> Artemis to production.
>
> There's no specific timeline set, although a lot of work has been done
> over the last year to close the feature gap. It would probably be a good
> idea for the community to reassess the situation and clarify what's still
> lacking (if anything).
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 12:15 PM Weihao Li <wl...@aware.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for your information. We are not looking for any specific
> > feature. We want to make sure if ActiveMQ Artemis is stable and robust
> > enough for migration. As your guys mentioned on official website, once
> > Artemis reaches a sufficient level, it will become ActiveMQ 6. Thus,
> > do you have a timeline that Artemis becomes to ActiveMQ 6?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Weihao Li
> >
> > From: Weihao Li
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 10:02 AM
> > To: 'users@activemq.apache.org' <us...@activemq.apache.org>
> > Subject: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry if this is not the correct mailing list.
> >
> > We are loyal Active MQ users for many years and we notice ActiveMQ
> > Artemis is released and we plan to migrate ActiveMQ 5 to ActiveMQ
> > Artemis in the future. But seems like ActiveMQ Artemis haven't reached
> > the sufficient level of feature with the 5.x code-base. Thus, we want
> > to get some information about the roadmap of ActiveMQ Artemis so that
> > we can schedule the migration work.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Weihao Li
> > Senior Software Engineer Aware, Inc.
> >
> > wli@aware.com<ma...@aware.com>
> > P. 781.687.0478
> >
> > 40 Middlesex Turnpike
> > Bedford, MA 01730
> > Main. 781-276-4000
> > www.aware.com<http://www.aware.com/>
> > Connect with Aware:
> > Web<https://www.aware.com/> | Blog<https://www.aware.com/blog/> |
> > Twitter< https://twitter.com/awarebiometrics> | LinkedIn<
> > https://www.linkedin.com/company/aware-inc.>
> >
> >
>
Re: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
Posted by Francesco Nigro <ni...@gmail.com>.
Probably the Sunning folks can answer this :)
Il giorno gio 3 set 2020 alle ore 17:02 Weihao Li <wl...@aware.com> ha
scritto:
> Good to know it. May I know which companies that are using Artemis in
> production now? I am interested to know if anyone is using in large scale.
>
> Thanks,
> Weihao Li
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 1:24 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
>
> As far as stability and "robustness" goes ActiveMQ Artemis is already
> production ready (and has been for a long time). The timeline for becoming
> ActiveMQ 6 is based on sufficient feature parity with the 5.x code-base,
> not general stability or production readiness. Lots of users have deployed
> Artemis to production.
>
> There's no specific timeline set, although a lot of work has been done
> over the last year to close the feature gap. It would probably be a good
> idea for the community to reassess the situation and clarify what's still
> lacking (if anything).
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 12:15 PM Weihao Li <wl...@aware.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for your information. We are not looking for any specific
> > feature. We want to make sure if ActiveMQ Artemis is stable and robust
> > enough for migration. As your guys mentioned on official website, once
> > Artemis reaches a sufficient level, it will become ActiveMQ 6. Thus,
> > do you have a timeline that Artemis becomes to ActiveMQ 6?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Weihao Li
> >
> > From: Weihao Li
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 10:02 AM
> > To: 'users@activemq.apache.org' <us...@activemq.apache.org>
> > Subject: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry if this is not the correct mailing list.
> >
> > We are loyal Active MQ users for many years and we notice ActiveMQ
> > Artemis is released and we plan to migrate ActiveMQ 5 to ActiveMQ
> > Artemis in the future. But seems like ActiveMQ Artemis haven't reached
> > the sufficient level of feature with the 5.x code-base. Thus, we want
> > to get some information about the roadmap of ActiveMQ Artemis so that
> > we can schedule the migration work.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Weihao Li
> > Senior Software Engineer Aware, Inc.
> >
> > wli@aware.com<ma...@aware.com>
> > P. 781.687.0478
> >
> > 40 Middlesex Turnpike
> > Bedford, MA 01730
> > Main. 781-276-4000
> > www.aware.com<http://www.aware.com/>
> > Connect with Aware:
> > Web<https://www.aware.com/> | Blog<https://www.aware.com/blog/> |
> > Twitter< https://twitter.com/awarebiometrics> | LinkedIn<
> > https://www.linkedin.com/company/aware-inc.>
> >
> >
>
RE: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
Posted by Weihao Li <wl...@aware.com>.
Good to know it. May I know which companies that are using Artemis in production now? I am interested to know if anyone is using in large scale.
Thanks,
Weihao Li
-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 1:24 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
As far as stability and "robustness" goes ActiveMQ Artemis is already production ready (and has been for a long time). The timeline for becoming ActiveMQ 6 is based on sufficient feature parity with the 5.x code-base, not general stability or production readiness. Lots of users have deployed Artemis to production.
There's no specific timeline set, although a lot of work has been done over the last year to close the feature gap. It would probably be a good idea for the community to reassess the situation and clarify what's still lacking (if anything).
Justin
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 12:15 PM Weihao Li <wl...@aware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your information. We are not looking for any specific
> feature. We want to make sure if ActiveMQ Artemis is stable and robust
> enough for migration. As your guys mentioned on official website, once
> Artemis reaches a sufficient level, it will become ActiveMQ 6. Thus,
> do you have a timeline that Artemis becomes to ActiveMQ 6?
>
> Thanks,
> Weihao Li
>
> From: Weihao Li
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 10:02 AM
> To: 'users@activemq.apache.org' <us...@activemq.apache.org>
> Subject: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if this is not the correct mailing list.
>
> We are loyal Active MQ users for many years and we notice ActiveMQ
> Artemis is released and we plan to migrate ActiveMQ 5 to ActiveMQ
> Artemis in the future. But seems like ActiveMQ Artemis haven't reached
> the sufficient level of feature with the 5.x code-base. Thus, we want
> to get some information about the roadmap of ActiveMQ Artemis so that
> we can schedule the migration work.
>
> Thanks,
> Weihao Li
> Senior Software Engineer Aware, Inc.
>
> wli@aware.com<ma...@aware.com>
> P. 781.687.0478
>
> 40 Middlesex Turnpike
> Bedford, MA 01730
> Main. 781-276-4000
> www.aware.com<http://www.aware.com/>
> Connect with Aware:
> Web<https://www.aware.com/> | Blog<https://www.aware.com/blog/> |
> Twitter< https://twitter.com/awarebiometrics> | LinkedIn<
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/aware-inc.>
>
>
Re: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
As far as stability and "robustness" goes ActiveMQ Artemis is already
production ready (and has been for a long time). The timeline for becoming
ActiveMQ 6 is based on sufficient feature parity with the 5.x code-base,
not general stability or production readiness. Lots of users have deployed
Artemis to production.
There's no specific timeline set, although a lot of work has been done over
the last year to close the feature gap. It would probably be a good idea
for the community to reassess the situation and clarify what's still
lacking (if anything).
Justin
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 12:15 PM Weihao Li <wl...@aware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your information. We are not looking for any specific
> feature. We want to make sure if ActiveMQ Artemis is stable and robust
> enough for migration. As your guys mentioned on official website, once
> Artemis reaches a sufficient level, it will become ActiveMQ 6. Thus, do you
> have a timeline that Artemis becomes to ActiveMQ 6?
>
> Thanks,
> Weihao Li
>
> From: Weihao Li
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 10:02 AM
> To: 'users@activemq.apache.org' <us...@activemq.apache.org>
> Subject: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if this is not the correct mailing list.
>
> We are loyal Active MQ users for many years and we notice ActiveMQ Artemis
> is released and we plan to migrate ActiveMQ 5 to ActiveMQ Artemis in the
> future. But seems like ActiveMQ Artemis haven't reached the sufficient
> level of feature with the 5.x code-base. Thus, we want to get some
> information about the roadmap of ActiveMQ Artemis so that we can schedule
> the migration work.
>
> Thanks,
> Weihao Li
> Senior Software Engineer Aware, Inc.
>
> wli@aware.com<ma...@aware.com>
> P. 781.687.0478
>
> 40 Middlesex Turnpike
> Bedford, MA 01730
> Main. 781-276-4000
> www.aware.com<http://www.aware.com/>
> Connect with Aware:
> Web<https://www.aware.com/> | Blog<https://www.aware.com/blog/> | Twitter<
> https://twitter.com/awarebiometrics> | LinkedIn<
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/aware-inc.>
>
>
RE: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
Posted by Weihao Li <wl...@aware.com>.
Hi,
Thank you for your information. We are not looking for any specific feature. We want to make sure if ActiveMQ Artemis is stable and robust enough for migration. As your guys mentioned on official website, once Artemis reaches a sufficient level, it will become ActiveMQ 6. Thus, do you have a timeline that Artemis becomes to ActiveMQ 6?
Thanks,
Weihao Li
From: Weihao Li
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 10:02 AM
To: 'users@activemq.apache.org' <us...@activemq.apache.org>
Subject: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
Hi,
Sorry if this is not the correct mailing list.
We are loyal Active MQ users for many years and we notice ActiveMQ Artemis is released and we plan to migrate ActiveMQ 5 to ActiveMQ Artemis in the future. But seems like ActiveMQ Artemis haven't reached the sufficient level of feature with the 5.x code-base. Thus, we want to get some information about the roadmap of ActiveMQ Artemis so that we can schedule the migration work.
Thanks,
Weihao Li
Senior Software Engineer Aware, Inc.
wli@aware.com<ma...@aware.com>
P. 781.687.0478
40 Middlesex Turnpike
Bedford, MA 01730
Main. 781-276-4000
www.aware.com<http://www.aware.com/>
Connect with Aware:
Web<https://www.aware.com/> | Blog<https://www.aware.com/blog/> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/awarebiometrics> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/aware-inc.>
Re: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
Posted by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>.
Hi Weihao Li,
Can you expand on the features that you require that are missing?
We are still committed to making migration as easy as possible.
Kind regards,
gary
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 15:23, Weihao Li <wl...@aware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if this is not the correct mailing list.
>
> We are loyal Active MQ users for many years and we notice ActiveMQ Artemis
> is released and we plan to migrate ActiveMQ 5 to ActiveMQ Artemis in the
> future. But seems like ActiveMQ Artemis haven't reached the sufficient
> level of feature with the 5.x code-base. Thus, we want to get some
> information about the roadmap of ActiveMQ Artemis so that we can schedule
> the migration work.
>
> Thanks,
> Weihao Li
> Senior Software Engineer Aware, Inc.
>
> wli@aware.com<ma...@aware.com>
> P. 781.687.0478
>
> 40 Middlesex Turnpike
> Bedford, MA 01730
> Main. 781-276-4000
> www.aware.com<http://www.aware.com/>
> Connect with Aware:
> Web<https://www.aware.com/> | Blog<https://www.aware.com/blog/> | Twitter<
> https://twitter.com/awarebiometrics> | LinkedIn<
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/aware-inc.>
>
>