You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Sandip Ghayal <sg...@yahoo.com> on 2005/01/26 21:45:42 UTC
Offering Assitance for Transaction
Hello Developers,
My name is Sandip Ghayal. I was looking at Geronimo
codeline and notice that currently transaction interop
part required for J2EE1.4 certification is absent.
I have done lot of work with Transaction Manager and
was wondering if I can help out in implementing this
part.
I can also help out with other parts of Transaction
Manager that might be currently envisioned as
incomplete or needs modificaton.
Please let me know where I can be of assistance.
Thanks,
Sandip Ghayal
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Offering Assitance for Transaction
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>.
On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:16 PM, Sandip Ghayal wrote:
> So let me jump into this and see I will try to provide
> you with working Tx interop, actually it will be
> non-working Tx Interop :-)
>
Go go go!
:)
geir
> Cheers,
>
> Sandip
> --- Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Sandip Ghayal wrote:
>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>
>>> For J2EE1.4 certification Geronimo Server does
>> need to
>>> pass Transaction Interop tests.
>>>
>>> At minimum Geronimo does need a facility to inform
>>> other Application Server that Geronimo Server does
>> not
>>> support Transaction Interop. (This is minimum
>>> requirement as per section 19.6.1 and 19.6.2 of
>> EJB
>>> 2.1 specifications)
>>>
>>
>> Yeah - sorry, I was jumping to an actual working
>> impl rather than just
>> saying we don't do that :-)
>>
>> That sounds like a good area to jump in.
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
Re: Offering Assitance for Transaction
Posted by Sandip Ghayal <sg...@yahoo.com>.
So let me jump into this and see I will try to provide
you with working Tx interop, actually it will be
non-working Tx Interop :-)
Cheers,
Sandip
--- Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Sandip Ghayal wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy,
> >
> > For J2EE1.4 certification Geronimo Server does
> need to
> > pass Transaction Interop tests.
> >
> > At minimum Geronimo does need a facility to inform
> > other Application Server that Geronimo Server does
> not
> > support Transaction Interop. (This is minimum
> > requirement as per section 19.6.1 and 19.6.2 of
> EJB
> > 2.1 specifications)
> >
>
> Yeah - sorry, I was jumping to an actual working
> impl rather than just
> saying we don't do that :-)
>
> That sounds like a good area to jump in.
>
> --
> Jeremy
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Offering Assitance for Transaction
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
Sandip Ghayal wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> For J2EE1.4 certification Geronimo Server does need to
> pass Transaction Interop tests.
>
> At minimum Geronimo does need a facility to inform
> other Application Server that Geronimo Server does not
> support Transaction Interop. (This is minimum
> requirement as per section 19.6.1 and 19.6.2 of EJB
> 2.1 specifications)
>
Yeah - sorry, I was jumping to an actual working impl rather than just
saying we don't do that :-)
That sounds like a good area to jump in.
--
Jeremy
Re: Offering Assitance for Transaction
Posted by Sandip Ghayal <sg...@yahoo.com>.
Hi Jeremy,
For J2EE1.4 certification Geronimo Server does need to
pass Transaction Interop tests.
At minimum Geronimo does need a facility to inform
other Application Server that Geronimo Server does not
support Transaction Interop. (This is minimum
requirement as per section 19.6.1 and 19.6.2 of EJB
2.1 specifications)
Thanks,
Sandip
--- Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Sandip Ghayal wrote:
> > Hello Developers,
> >
> > My name is Sandip Ghayal. I was looking at
> Geronimo
> > codeline and notice that currently transaction
> interop
> > part required for J2EE1.4 certification is absent.
> >
>
> Transaction interop is an optional part of the
> specification, largely I
> believe due to the complexities in coupling between
> participants. As
> such, we don't actually need this to certify.
> However, going forward
> this is something we definitely want to support.
>
> > I have done lot of work with Transaction Manager
> and
> > was wondering if I can help out in implementing
> this
> > part.
>
> That will certainly help. We would also need to
> address the issue with
> cache-coherency between participants although that
> could come later.
>
> --
> Jeremy
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Re: Offering Assitance for Transaction
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
Sandip Ghayal wrote:
> Hello Developers,
>
> My name is Sandip Ghayal. I was looking at Geronimo
> codeline and notice that currently transaction interop
> part required for J2EE1.4 certification is absent.
>
Transaction interop is an optional part of the specification, largely I
believe due to the complexities in coupling between participants. As
such, we don't actually need this to certify. However, going forward
this is something we definitely want to support.
> I have done lot of work with Transaction Manager and
> was wondering if I can help out in implementing this
> part.
That will certainly help. We would also need to address the issue with
cache-coherency between participants although that could come later.
--
Jeremy