You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Otto TheBusDriver <bu...@gmail.com> on 2007/07/11 21:58:03 UTC

FP | SARE_BEASTUD

I'm seeing False Positives on the rule SARE_BEASTUD for a message that
we are receiving.

This rule is matching on the following text "be a studio".

"I look forward to reading many more books, and when my voice goes, I
will continue to be a studio monitor and technician."

How does one go about getting this rule re-evaluated or modified to
avoid these FPs in the 70_sare_adult configs?

body     SARE_BEASTUD /be a stud/i
describe SARE_BEASTUD common spammer phrasing
score    SARE_BEASTUD 0.26
# Original name: RM_bpm_BeAStud
#  53s/0h of 119325 corpus (98981s/20344h) 03/21/04
#  7s/0h of 15929 corpus (13729s/2200h) 03/23/04
#counts   SARE_BEASTUD             73s/2h of 42056 corpus
(34127s/7929h FVGT) 04/19/06
#counts   SARE_BEASTUD             20s/1h of 140226 corpus
(90162s/50064h DOC) 04/19/06

Thanks,
Otto

Re: FP | SARE_BEASTUD

Posted by "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <sp...@dostech.ca>.
Otto TheBusDriver wrote:
> I'm seeing False Positives on the rule SARE_BEASTUD for a message that
> we are receiving.
> 
> This rule is matching on the following text "be a studio".
> 
> "I look forward to reading many more books, and when my voice goes, I
> will continue to be a studio monitor and technician."
> 
> How does one go about getting this rule re-evaluated or modified to
> avoid these FPs in the 70_sare_adult configs?

For a whopping score of 0.26 I wouldn't bother, but you could try the 
SARE users list.

Daryl


> body     SARE_BEASTUD /be a stud/i
> describe SARE_BEASTUD common spammer phrasing
> score    SARE_BEASTUD 0.26
> # Original name: RM_bpm_BeAStud
> #  53s/0h of 119325 corpus (98981s/20344h) 03/21/04
> #  7s/0h of 15929 corpus (13729s/2200h) 03/23/04
> #counts   SARE_BEASTUD             73s/2h of 42056 corpus
> (34127s/7929h FVGT) 04/19/06
> #counts   SARE_BEASTUD             20s/1h of 140226 corpus
> (90162s/50064h DOC) 04/19/06
> 
> Thanks,
> Otto
>