You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Hanson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/07/29 02:55:40 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-7518) The In-Memory option

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14077227#comment-14077227 ] 

Hanson commented on CASSANDRA-7518:
-----------------------------------

I do not have access to DataStax JIRA.

My another post on stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24719276/cassandra-in-memory-option

It mentioned that the DataStax White Paper asserts that in upcoming version the amount of memory for single node will increase probably via JNA, but no solid timeline.


> The In-Memory option
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7518
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7518
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Hanson
>             Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>
> There is an In-Memory option introduced in the commercial version of Cassandra by DataStax Enterprise 4.0:
> http://www.datastax.com/documentation/datastax_enterprise/4.0/datastax_enterprise/inMemory.html
> But with 1GB size limited for an in-memory table.
> It would be great if the In-Memory option can be available to the community version of Cassandra, and extend to a large size of in-memory table, such as 64GB.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)