You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> on 2007/01/06 02:00:36 UTC
Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Hi,
Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany which
is backed by MoinMoinWiki. I personally found it's not very productive to
work this wiki. Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it seems to be more
attractive:
* Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
* Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text" editing in addtion
to "Wiki Markup"
* Export to PDF/word/HTML
* Comments
* And more ...
Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence. You can see
more details at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index.
Quite a few projects use it to maintain their web sites and documentations.
Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our existing contents
over? We can take this chance to better organize our materials.
Thanks,
Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com>.
Folks,
I only saw this discussion recently, since I was heads-down with the SCA
1.0 specs for the past month.
The www.osoa.org site is wholly based on using the Confluence Wiki and
our experience with it is good. You can pass your own judgement on how
good the www.osoa.org site looks ;-) but it did not take much effort
to do. It is easy to create sub-portions of the site as well - we have
about a dozen running now.
There are quite a few off-the-shelf features and plugins and they are
maintained - Confluence is a commercial product with a development team
behind it.
Yours, Mike.
Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany
> which is backed by MoinMoinWiki. I personally found it's not very
> productive to work this wiki. Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it
> seems to be more attractive:
>
> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text" editing in
> addtion to "Wiki Markup"
> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
> * Comments
> * And more ...
>
> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence. You can
> see more details at
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index. Quite a few
> projects use it to maintain their web sites and documentations.
>
> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our existing contents
> over? We can take this chance to better organize our materials.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On 2/7/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> haleh mahbod wrote:
> > +1 for moving to cwiki. Much easier to use.
> >
> > On 2/7/07, Rick Rineholt <cr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have found having too many sources 2 wikis, the web site, doco
> checked
> >> in to svn to be a major confusion and a general appearance
> >> disorganization. I think we should at the very least now retire one of
> >> the wiki sites. I'm for moving to cwiki.
> >> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I guess the website and the wiki are both needed and am very much in
> >> line
> >> > with Dan's thoughts on what should go into each of this.
> >> >
> >> > I guess its now a question of whether we want to move our content
> >> out of
> >> > that old wike over CWIKI. I'd say we must go with CWIKI which is a
> >> > lot more
> >> > pleasant to look and feel.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > - Venkat
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 2/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Dan Murphy wrote:
> >> >> > Similar to Haleh's opinion... a hybrid of web and wiki seems to
> >> make
> >> >> > sense
> >> >> > - use the web site for fairly static content but link from the
> >> >> website
> >> >> > directly to appropriate places in the wiki where the content is
> >> likely
> >> >> to
> >> >> > change or hasn't fully been decided yet.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > For example, we could remove the "how to build, test and deploy
> >> Java
> >> >> SCA"
> >> >> > off of the web site and instead link from the web page to a wiki
> >> page.
> >> >> > (IMHO) it becomes easier to maintain... perhaps if/when it
> settles
> >> >> > down (or
> >> >> > @ V1) we could merge it back into the web site. I'd be happy to
> >> help
> >> >> > maintain this because I can edit the wiki - for me to contribute
> to
> >> >> > the web
> >> >> > site takes much more effort... perhaps this isn't so important to
> >> >> > others who
> >> >> > are already committers...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Dan
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 07/02/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE
> >> >> >> website:
> >> >> >> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently
> >> our
> >> >> >> website is
> >> >> >> in svn which covers that.
> >> >> >> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not
> >> >> "fancy"
> >> >> >> organized
> >> >> >> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Is Confluence backed up regularly?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move
> >> all
> >> >> >> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs,
> >> release
> >> >> >> information and downloads, etc.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where it
> is
> >> >> right
> >> >> >> now
> >> >> >> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We
> >> >> should
> >> >> >> not
> >> >> >> move it until we have a good replacement.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Hi Kelvin,
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
> >> >> >> > CWIKI. Infact
> >> >> >> > some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for
> >> >> SCA M3,
> >> >> >> some
> >> >> >> > documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found
> >> place
> >> >> >> there.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Thanks
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > - Venkat
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where
> >> >> we are
> >> >> >> with
> >> >> >> > > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > Kelvin.
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > > Hi,
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered
> >> users.
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> >> >> > > > Raymond
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> >> > > > From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> > > > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> >> >> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
> >> >> >> > > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> > > > > <snip>
> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> > > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
> >> >> >> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some
> >> >> >> guidances
> >> >> >> > for
> >> >> >> > > > >> cases
> >> >> >> > > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered
> >> >> users) or
> >> >> >> > > > >> documentation
> >> >> >> > > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> > > > > I also think all our content should be open to any
> >> registered
> >> >> >> user.
> >> >> >> > We
> >> >> >> > > > > want
> >> >> >> > > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more
> >> >> likely to
> >> >> >> > happen
> >> >> >> > > if
> >> >> >> > > > > we
> >> >> >> > > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in
> >> >> >> patches for
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > > > > wiki
> >> >> >> > > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we
> >> >> all can
> >> >> >> > > monitor
> >> >> >> > > > > the
> >> >> >> > > > > changes?
> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> > > > > ...ant
> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >> >> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> Looks like a number of projects have already moved their web sites
> to
> >> >> confluence, including Cayenne, Cxf, Qpid, Directory, Mina, Ode,
> >> >> ServiceMix, Felix, Yoko, Wicket...
> >> >>
> >> >> The whole list is there:
> >> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dashboard.action
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Jean-Sebastien
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> In addition to start moving our current Wiki to CWiki, I think it would
> be a good idea to incrementally move parts of the current Web site (and
> at some point the whole Web site) to CWiki as well. Cwiki is really easy
> to use and I think this will encourage people to contribute more content
> to the Web site.
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
> +1 we use a Confluence based site for the PHP SCA/SDO site (
http://www.osoa.org/display/PHP/SOA+PHP+Homepage) and have found it very
satisfactory. Certainly a step up from the existing Apache Wiki in terms of
eas of use and presentation impact.
Simon
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com>.
+1 for moving all Wiki content to cwiki. And I agree that we should
use the Wiki for content from the Web site that needs updating more
frequently.
Simon
Andrew Borley wrote:
> +1 for a single wiki - happy with cwiki
>
> On 2/7/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for moving to cwiki. Much easier to use.
>>
>> On 2/7/07, Rick Rineholt <cr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I have found having too many sources 2 wikis, the web site, doco
>> checked
>> > in to svn to be a major confusion and a general appearance
>> > disorganization. I think we should at the very least now retire one of
>> > the wiki sites. I'm for moving to cwiki.
>> > Venkata Krishnan wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I guess the website and the wiki are both needed and am very much in
>> > line
>> > > with Dan's thoughts on what should go into each of this.
>> > >
>> > > I guess its now a question of whether we want to move our content
>> out of
>> > > that old wike over CWIKI. I'd say we must go with CWIKI which is a
>> > > lot more
>> > > pleasant to look and feel.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > - Venkat
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 2/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Dan Murphy wrote:
>> > >> > Similar to Haleh's opinion... a hybrid of web and wiki seems to
>> make
>> > >> > sense
>> > >> > - use the web site for fairly static content but link from the
>> > >> website
>> > >> > directly to appropriate places in the wiki where the content is
>> > likely
>> > >> to
>> > >> > change or hasn't fully been decided yet.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > For example, we could remove the "how to build, test and deploy
>> Java
>> > >> SCA"
>> > >> > off of the web site and instead link from the web page to a wiki
>> > page.
>> > >> > (IMHO) it becomes easier to maintain... perhaps if/when it
>> settles
>> > >> > down (or
>> > >> > @ V1) we could merge it back into the web site. I'd be happy to
>> help
>> > >> > maintain this because I can edit the wiki - for me to
>> contribute to
>> > >> > the web
>> > >> > site takes much more effort... perhaps this isn't so important to
>> > >> > others who
>> > >> > are already committers...
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Dan
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On 07/02/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE
>> > >> >> website:
>> > >> >> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently
>> > our
>> > >> >> website is
>> > >> >> in svn which covers that.
>> > >> >> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not
>> > >> "fancy"
>> > >> >> organized
>> > >> >> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Is Confluence backed up regularly?
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and
>> move all
>> > >> >> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs,
>> release
>> > >> >> information and downloads, etc.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where
>> it is
>> > >> right
>> > >> >> now
>> > >> >> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We
>> > >> should
>> > >> >> not
>> > >> >> move it until we have a good replacement.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Hi Kelvin,
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
>> > >> >> > CWIKI. Infact
>> > >> >> > some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for
>> > >> SCA M3,
>> > >> >> some
>> > >> >> > documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found
>> place
>> > >> >> there.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Thanks
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > - Venkat
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where
>> > >> we are
>> > >> >> with
>> > >> >> > > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > Kelvin.
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > Hi,
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered
>> users.
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > Thanks,
>> > >> >> > > > Raymond
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > >> >> > > > From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >> > > > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
>> > >> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
>> > >> >> > > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > <snip>
>> > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
>> > >> >> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some
>> > >> >> guidances
>> > >> >> > for
>> > >> >> > > > >> cases
>> > >> >> > > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered
>> > >> users) or
>> > >> >> > > > >> documentation
>> > >> >> > > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
>> > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > I also think all our content should be open to any
>> > registered
>> > >> >> user.
>> > >> >> > We
>> > >> >> > > > > want
>> > >> >> > > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more
>> > >> likely to
>> > >> >> > happen
>> > >> >> > > if
>> > >> >> > > > > we
>> > >> >> > > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in
>> > >> >> patches for
>> > >> >> > the
>> > >> >> > > > > wiki
>> > >> >> > > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we
>> > >> all can
>> > >> >> > > monitor
>> > >> >> > > > > the
>> > >> >> > > > > changes?
>> > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > ...ant
>> > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >>
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> > >> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> Looks like a number of projects have already moved their web
>> sites to
>> > >> confluence, including Cayenne, Cxf, Qpid, Directory, Mina, Ode,
>> > >> ServiceMix, Felix, Yoko, Wicket...
>> > >>
>> > >> The whole list is there:
>> > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dashboard.action
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Jean-Sebastien
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Andrew Borley <aj...@gmail.com>.
+1 for a single wiki - happy with cwiki
On 2/7/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for moving to cwiki. Much easier to use.
>
> On 2/7/07, Rick Rineholt <cr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have found having too many sources 2 wikis, the web site, doco checked
> > in to svn to be a major confusion and a general appearance
> > disorganization. I think we should at the very least now retire one of
> > the wiki sites. I'm for moving to cwiki.
> > Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I guess the website and the wiki are both needed and am very much in
> > line
> > > with Dan's thoughts on what should go into each of this.
> > >
> > > I guess its now a question of whether we want to move our content out of
> > > that old wike over CWIKI. I'd say we must go with CWIKI which is a
> > > lot more
> > > pleasant to look and feel.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > - Venkat
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Dan Murphy wrote:
> > >> > Similar to Haleh's opinion... a hybrid of web and wiki seems to make
> > >> > sense
> > >> > - use the web site for fairly static content but link from the
> > >> website
> > >> > directly to appropriate places in the wiki where the content is
> > likely
> > >> to
> > >> > change or hasn't fully been decided yet.
> > >> >
> > >> > For example, we could remove the "how to build, test and deploy Java
> > >> SCA"
> > >> > off of the web site and instead link from the web page to a wiki
> > page.
> > >> > (IMHO) it becomes easier to maintain... perhaps if/when it settles
> > >> > down (or
> > >> > @ V1) we could merge it back into the web site. I'd be happy to help
> > >> > maintain this because I can edit the wiki - for me to contribute to
> > >> > the web
> > >> > site takes much more effort... perhaps this isn't so important to
> > >> > others who
> > >> > are already committers...
> > >> >
> > >> > Dan
> > >> >
> > >> > On 07/02/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE
> > >> >> website:
> > >> >> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently
> > our
> > >> >> website is
> > >> >> in svn which covers that.
> > >> >> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not
> > >> "fancy"
> > >> >> organized
> > >> >> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Is Confluence backed up regularly?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move all
> > >> >> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs, release
> > >> >> information and downloads, etc.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where it is
> > >> right
> > >> >> now
> > >> >> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We
> > >> should
> > >> >> not
> > >> >> move it until we have a good replacement.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Hi Kelvin,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
> > >> >> > CWIKI. Infact
> > >> >> > some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for
> > >> SCA M3,
> > >> >> some
> > >> >> > documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found place
> > >> >> there.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Thanks
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > - Venkat
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where
> > >> we are
> > >> >> with
> > >> >> > > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Kelvin.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > Hi,
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered users.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> >> > > > Raymond
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >> > > > From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
> > >> >> > > > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> > >> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
> > >> >> > > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > <snip>
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
> > >> >> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some
> > >> >> guidances
> > >> >> > for
> > >> >> > > > >> cases
> > >> >> > > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered
> > >> users) or
> > >> >> > > > >> documentation
> > >> >> > > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > I also think all our content should be open to any
> > registered
> > >> >> user.
> > >> >> > We
> > >> >> > > > > want
> > >> >> > > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more
> > >> likely to
> > >> >> > happen
> > >> >> > > if
> > >> >> > > > > we
> > >> >> > > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in
> > >> >> patches for
> > >> >> > the
> > >> >> > > > > wiki
> > >> >> > > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we
> > >> all can
> > >> >> > > monitor
> > >> >> > > > > the
> > >> >> > > > > changes?
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > ...ant
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > >> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> Looks like a number of projects have already moved their web sites to
> > >> confluence, including Cayenne, Cxf, Qpid, Directory, Mina, Ode,
> > >> ServiceMix, Felix, Yoko, Wicket...
> > >>
> > >> The whole list is there:
> > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dashboard.action
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Jean-Sebastien
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
haleh mahbod wrote:
> +1 for moving to cwiki. Much easier to use.
>
> On 2/7/07, Rick Rineholt <cr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have found having too many sources 2 wikis, the web site, doco checked
>> in to svn to be a major confusion and a general appearance
>> disorganization. I think we should at the very least now retire one of
>> the wiki sites. I'm for moving to cwiki.
>> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I guess the website and the wiki are both needed and am very much in
>> line
>> > with Dan's thoughts on what should go into each of this.
>> >
>> > I guess its now a question of whether we want to move our content
>> out of
>> > that old wike over CWIKI. I'd say we must go with CWIKI which is a
>> > lot more
>> > pleasant to look and feel.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > - Venkat
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Dan Murphy wrote:
>> >> > Similar to Haleh's opinion... a hybrid of web and wiki seems to
>> make
>> >> > sense
>> >> > - use the web site for fairly static content but link from the
>> >> website
>> >> > directly to appropriate places in the wiki where the content is
>> likely
>> >> to
>> >> > change or hasn't fully been decided yet.
>> >> >
>> >> > For example, we could remove the "how to build, test and deploy
>> Java
>> >> SCA"
>> >> > off of the web site and instead link from the web page to a wiki
>> page.
>> >> > (IMHO) it becomes easier to maintain... perhaps if/when it settles
>> >> > down (or
>> >> > @ V1) we could merge it back into the web site. I'd be happy to
>> help
>> >> > maintain this because I can edit the wiki - for me to contribute to
>> >> > the web
>> >> > site takes much more effort... perhaps this isn't so important to
>> >> > others who
>> >> > are already committers...
>> >> >
>> >> > Dan
>> >> >
>> >> > On 07/02/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE
>> >> >> website:
>> >> >> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently
>> our
>> >> >> website is
>> >> >> in svn which covers that.
>> >> >> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not
>> >> "fancy"
>> >> >> organized
>> >> >> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Is Confluence backed up regularly?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move
>> all
>> >> >> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs,
>> release
>> >> >> information and downloads, etc.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where it is
>> >> right
>> >> >> now
>> >> >> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We
>> >> should
>> >> >> not
>> >> >> move it until we have a good replacement.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hi Kelvin,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
>> >> >> > CWIKI. Infact
>> >> >> > some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for
>> >> SCA M3,
>> >> >> some
>> >> >> > documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found
>> place
>> >> >> there.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > - Venkat
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where
>> >> we are
>> >> >> with
>> >> >> > > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Kelvin.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > Hi,
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered
>> users.
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > Thanks,
>> >> >> > > > Raymond
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> >> > > > From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> > > > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
>> >> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
>> >> >> > > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> > > > > <snip>
>> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> > > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
>> >> >> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some
>> >> >> guidances
>> >> >> > for
>> >> >> > > > >> cases
>> >> >> > > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered
>> >> users) or
>> >> >> > > > >> documentation
>> >> >> > > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
>> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> > > > > I also think all our content should be open to any
>> registered
>> >> >> user.
>> >> >> > We
>> >> >> > > > > want
>> >> >> > > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more
>> >> likely to
>> >> >> > happen
>> >> >> > > if
>> >> >> > > > > we
>> >> >> > > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in
>> >> >> patches for
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > > > > wiki
>> >> >> > > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we
>> >> all can
>> >> >> > > monitor
>> >> >> > > > > the
>> >> >> > > > > changes?
>> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> > > > > ...ant
>> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> >> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> Looks like a number of projects have already moved their web sites to
>> >> confluence, including Cayenne, Cxf, Qpid, Directory, Mina, Ode,
>> >> ServiceMix, Felix, Yoko, Wicket...
>> >>
>> >> The whole list is there:
>> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dashboard.action
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jean-Sebastien
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
In addition to start moving our current Wiki to CWiki, I think it would
be a good idea to incrementally move parts of the current Web site (and
at some point the whole Web site) to CWiki as well. Cwiki is really easy
to use and I think this will encourage people to contribute more content
to the Web site.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com>.
+1 for moving to cwiki. Much easier to use.
On 2/7/07, Rick Rineholt <cr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have found having too many sources 2 wikis, the web site, doco checked
> in to svn to be a major confusion and a general appearance
> disorganization. I think we should at the very least now retire one of
> the wiki sites. I'm for moving to cwiki.
> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I guess the website and the wiki are both needed and am very much in
> line
> > with Dan's thoughts on what should go into each of this.
> >
> > I guess its now a question of whether we want to move our content out of
> > that old wike over CWIKI. I'd say we must go with CWIKI which is a
> > lot more
> > pleasant to look and feel.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > - Venkat
> >
> >
> > On 2/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dan Murphy wrote:
> >> > Similar to Haleh's opinion... a hybrid of web and wiki seems to make
> >> > sense
> >> > - use the web site for fairly static content but link from the
> >> website
> >> > directly to appropriate places in the wiki where the content is
> likely
> >> to
> >> > change or hasn't fully been decided yet.
> >> >
> >> > For example, we could remove the "how to build, test and deploy Java
> >> SCA"
> >> > off of the web site and instead link from the web page to a wiki
> page.
> >> > (IMHO) it becomes easier to maintain... perhaps if/when it settles
> >> > down (or
> >> > @ V1) we could merge it back into the web site. I'd be happy to help
> >> > maintain this because I can edit the wiki - for me to contribute to
> >> > the web
> >> > site takes much more effort... perhaps this isn't so important to
> >> > others who
> >> > are already committers...
> >> >
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >> > On 07/02/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE
> >> >> website:
> >> >> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently
> our
> >> >> website is
> >> >> in svn which covers that.
> >> >> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not
> >> "fancy"
> >> >> organized
> >> >> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
> >> >>
> >> >> Is Confluence backed up regularly?
> >> >>
> >> >> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move all
> >> >> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs, release
> >> >> information and downloads, etc.
> >> >>
> >> >> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where it is
> >> right
> >> >> now
> >> >> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We
> >> should
> >> >> not
> >> >> move it until we have a good replacement.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hi Kelvin,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
> >> >> > CWIKI. Infact
> >> >> > some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for
> >> SCA M3,
> >> >> some
> >> >> > documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found place
> >> >> there.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks
> >> >> >
> >> >> > - Venkat
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where
> >> we are
> >> >> with
> >> >> > > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Kelvin.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Hi,
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered users.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> >> > > > Raymond
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> > > > From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
> >> >> > > > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> >> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
> >> >> > > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > <snip>
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
> >> >> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some
> >> >> guidances
> >> >> > for
> >> >> > > > >> cases
> >> >> > > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered
> >> users) or
> >> >> > > > >> documentation
> >> >> > > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > I also think all our content should be open to any
> registered
> >> >> user.
> >> >> > We
> >> >> > > > > want
> >> >> > > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more
> >> likely to
> >> >> > happen
> >> >> > > if
> >> >> > > > > we
> >> >> > > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in
> >> >> patches for
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > > > > wiki
> >> >> > > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we
> >> all can
> >> >> > > monitor
> >> >> > > > > the
> >> >> > > > > changes?
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > ...ant
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> Looks like a number of projects have already moved their web sites to
> >> confluence, including Cayenne, Cxf, Qpid, Directory, Mina, Ode,
> >> ServiceMix, Felix, Yoko, Wicket...
> >>
> >> The whole list is there:
> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dashboard.action
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Sebastien
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Rick Rineholt <cr...@gmail.com>.
I have found having too many sources 2 wikis, the web site, doco checked
in to svn to be a major confusion and a general appearance
disorganization. I think we should at the very least now retire one of
the wiki sites. I'm for moving to cwiki.
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess the website and the wiki are both needed and am very much in line
> with Dan's thoughts on what should go into each of this.
>
> I guess its now a question of whether we want to move our content out of
> that old wike over CWIKI. I'd say we must go with CWIKI which is a
> lot more
> pleasant to look and feel.
>
> Thanks
>
> - Venkat
>
>
> On 2/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Dan Murphy wrote:
>> > Similar to Haleh's opinion... a hybrid of web and wiki seems to make
>> > sense
>> > - use the web site for fairly static content but link from the
>> website
>> > directly to appropriate places in the wiki where the content is likely
>> to
>> > change or hasn't fully been decided yet.
>> >
>> > For example, we could remove the "how to build, test and deploy Java
>> SCA"
>> > off of the web site and instead link from the web page to a wiki page.
>> > (IMHO) it becomes easier to maintain... perhaps if/when it settles
>> > down (or
>> > @ V1) we could merge it back into the web site. I'd be happy to help
>> > maintain this because I can edit the wiki - for me to contribute to
>> > the web
>> > site takes much more effort... perhaps this isn't so important to
>> > others who
>> > are already committers...
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> > On 07/02/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE
>> >> website:
>> >> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently our
>> >> website is
>> >> in svn which covers that.
>> >> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not
>> "fancy"
>> >> organized
>> >> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
>> >>
>> >> Is Confluence backed up regularly?
>> >>
>> >> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move all
>> >> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs, release
>> >> information and downloads, etc.
>> >>
>> >> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where it is
>> right
>> >> now
>> >> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We
>> should
>> >> not
>> >> move it until we have a good replacement.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Kelvin,
>> >> >
>> >> > In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
>> >> > CWIKI. Infact
>> >> > some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for
>> SCA M3,
>> >> some
>> >> > documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found place
>> >> there.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > - Venkat
>> >> >
>> >> > On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where
>> we are
>> >> with
>> >> > > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Kelvin.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Hi,
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered users.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Thanks,
>> >> > > > Raymond
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> > > > From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
>> >> > > > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
>> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
>> >> > > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > <snip>
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
>> >> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some
>> >> guidances
>> >> > for
>> >> > > > >> cases
>> >> > > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered
>> users) or
>> >> > > > >> documentation
>> >> > > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > I also think all our content should be open to any registered
>> >> user.
>> >> > We
>> >> > > > > want
>> >> > > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more
>> likely to
>> >> > happen
>> >> > > if
>> >> > > > > we
>> >> > > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in
>> >> patches for
>> >> > the
>> >> > > > > wiki
>> >> > > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we
>> all can
>> >> > > monitor
>> >> > > > > the
>> >> > > > > changes?
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > ...ant
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> Looks like a number of projects have already moved their web sites to
>> confluence, including Cayenne, Cxf, Qpid, Directory, Mina, Ode,
>> ServiceMix, Felix, Yoko, Wicket...
>>
>> The whole list is there:
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dashboard.action
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Sebastien
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I guess the website and the wiki are both needed and am very much in line
with Dan's thoughts on what should go into each of this.
I guess its now a question of whether we want to move our content out of
that old wike over CWIKI. I'd say we must go with CWIKI which is a lot more
pleasant to look and feel.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 2/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Dan Murphy wrote:
> > Similar to Haleh's opinion... a hybrid of web and wiki seems to make
> > sense
> > - use the web site for fairly static content but link from the website
> > directly to appropriate places in the wiki where the content is likely
> to
> > change or hasn't fully been decided yet.
> >
> > For example, we could remove the "how to build, test and deploy Java
> SCA"
> > off of the web site and instead link from the web page to a wiki page.
> > (IMHO) it becomes easier to maintain... perhaps if/when it settles
> > down (or
> > @ V1) we could merge it back into the web site. I'd be happy to help
> > maintain this because I can edit the wiki - for me to contribute to
> > the web
> > site takes much more effort... perhaps this isn't so important to
> > others who
> > are already committers...
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On 07/02/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE
> >> website:
> >> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently our
> >> website is
> >> in svn which covers that.
> >> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not "fancy"
> >> organized
> >> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
> >>
> >> Is Confluence backed up regularly?
> >>
> >> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move all
> >> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs, release
> >> information and downloads, etc.
> >>
> >> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where it is
> right
> >> now
> >> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We should
> >> not
> >> move it until we have a good replacement.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi Kelvin,
> >> >
> >> > In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
> >> > CWIKI. Infact
> >> > some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for SCA M3,
> >> some
> >> > documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found place
> >> there.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > - Venkat
> >> >
> >> > On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where we are
> >> with
> >> > > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
> >> > >
> >> > > Kelvin.
> >> > >
> >> > > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered users.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > Raymond
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > > > From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
> >> > > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > <snip>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
> >> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some
> >> guidances
> >> > for
> >> > > > >> cases
> >> > > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered users) or
> >> > > > >> documentation
> >> > > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I also think all our content should be open to any registered
> >> user.
> >> > We
> >> > > > > want
> >> > > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more likely to
> >> > happen
> >> > > if
> >> > > > > we
> >> > > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in
> >> patches for
> >> > the
> >> > > > > wiki
> >> > > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we all can
> >> > > monitor
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > changes?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > ...ant
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> Looks like a number of projects have already moved their web sites to
> confluence, including Cayenne, Cxf, Qpid, Directory, Mina, Ode,
> ServiceMix, Felix, Yoko, Wicket...
>
> The whole list is there:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dashboard.action
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
Dan Murphy wrote:
> Similar to Haleh's opinion... a hybrid of web and wiki seems to make
> sense
> - use the web site for fairly static content but link from the website
> directly to appropriate places in the wiki where the content is likely to
> change or hasn't fully been decided yet.
>
> For example, we could remove the "how to build, test and deploy Java SCA"
> off of the web site and instead link from the web page to a wiki page.
> (IMHO) it becomes easier to maintain... perhaps if/when it settles
> down (or
> @ V1) we could merge it back into the web site. I'd be happy to help
> maintain this because I can edit the wiki - for me to contribute to
> the web
> site takes much more effort... perhaps this isn't so important to
> others who
> are already committers...
>
> Dan
>
> On 07/02/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE
>> website:
>> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently our
>> website is
>> in svn which covers that.
>> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not "fancy"
>> organized
>> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
>>
>> Is Confluence backed up regularly?
>>
>> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move all
>> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs, release
>> information and downloads, etc.
>>
>> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where it is right
>> now
>> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We should
>> not
>> move it until we have a good replacement.
>>
>>
>> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Kelvin,
>> >
>> > In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
>> > CWIKI. Infact
>> > some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for SCA M3,
>> some
>> > documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found place
>> there.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > - Venkat
>> >
>> > On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where we are
>> with
>> > > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
>> > >
>> > > Kelvin.
>> > >
>> > > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered users.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Raymond
>> > > >
>> > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
>> > > > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
>> > > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > <snip>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
>> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some
>> guidances
>> > for
>> > > > >> cases
>> > > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered users) or
>> > > > >> documentation
>> > > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I also think all our content should be open to any registered
>> user.
>> > We
>> > > > > want
>> > > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more likely to
>> > happen
>> > > if
>> > > > > we
>> > > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in
>> patches for
>> > the
>> > > > > wiki
>> > > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we all can
>> > > monitor
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > changes?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ...ant
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Looks like a number of projects have already moved their web sites to
confluence, including Cayenne, Cxf, Qpid, Directory, Mina, Ode,
ServiceMix, Felix, Yoko, Wicket...
The whole list is there: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dashboard.action
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Dan Murphy <dm...@googlemail.com>.
Similar to Haleh's opinion... a hybrid of web and wiki seems to make sense
- use the web site for fairly static content but link from the website
directly to appropriate places in the wiki where the content is likely to
change or hasn't fully been decided yet.
For example, we could remove the "how to build, test and deploy Java SCA"
off of the web site and instead link from the web page to a wiki page.
(IMHO) it becomes easier to maintain... perhaps if/when it settles down (or
@ V1) we could merge it back into the web site. I'd be happy to help
maintain this because I can edit the wiki - for me to contribute to the web
site takes much more effort... perhaps this isn't so important to others who
are already committers...
Dan
On 07/02/07, haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE website:
> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently our
> website is
> in svn which covers that.
> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not "fancy"
> organized
> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
>
> Is Confluence backed up regularly?
>
> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move all
> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs, release
> information and downloads, etc.
>
> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where it is right
> now
> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We should
> not
> move it until we have a good replacement.
>
>
> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kelvin,
> >
> > In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
> > CWIKI. Infact
> > some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for SCA M3,
> some
> > documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found place there.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > - Venkat
> >
> > On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where we are
> with
> > > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
> > >
> > > Kelvin.
> > >
> > > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered users.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Raymond
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some guidances
> > for
> > > > >> cases
> > > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered users) or
> > > > >> documentation
> > > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I also think all our content should be open to any registered
> user.
> > We
> > > > > want
> > > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more likely to
> > happen
> > > if
> > > > > we
> > > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in patches for
> > the
> > > > > wiki
> > > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we all can
> > > monitor
> > > > > the
> > > > > changes?
> > > > >
> > > > > ...ant
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Some comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "haleh mahbod" <hm...@gmail.com>
To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
Cc: <ke...@thegoodsons.org.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE website:
> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently our
> website is
> in svn which covers that.
> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not "fancy"
> organized
> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
>
> Is Confluence backed up regularly?
1. The CWIKI supports "history". You can see the changes in a very nice diff
page and you see the page history.
2. The CWIKI is "autoexport"ed if we use it as a web site. The CWIKI adopts
a hierarchy for pages in a space, meaning you can have child pages for a
page.
3. The Apache CWIKI is backed up. Please see http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/.
>
> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move all
> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs, release
> information and downloads, etc.
>
We didn't do a massive migration. I would suggest that we migrate the
contents on-demand. There are conversion tools available from Conflunece to
convert pages from other wikis into CWIKI.
> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where it is right
> now
> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We should
> not
> move it until we have a good replacement.
+1
>
>
> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kelvin,
>>
>> In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
>> CWIKI. Infact
>> some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for SCA M3,
>> some
>> documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found place there.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> - Venkat
>>
>> On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where we are
>> > with
>> > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
>> >
>> > Kelvin.
>> >
>> > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered users.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Raymond
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
>> > > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
>> > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > <snip>
>> > > >
>> > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
>> > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some guidances
>> for
>> > > >> cases
>> > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered users) or
>> > > >> documentation
>> > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I also think all our content should be open to any registered user.
>> We
>> > > > want
>> > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more likely to
>> happen
>> > if
>> > > > we
>> > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in patches for
>> the
>> > > > wiki
>> > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we all can
>> > monitor
>> > > > the
>> > > > changes?
>> > > >
>> > > > ...ant
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by haleh mahbod <hm...@gmail.com>.
Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE website:
Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently our
website is
in svn which covers that.
The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not "fancy"
organized
etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
Is Confluence backed up regularly?
Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move all
documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs, release
information and downloads, etc.
It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where it is right now
and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We should not
move it until we have a good replacement.
On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Kelvin,
>
> In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
> CWIKI. Infact
> some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for SCA M3, some
> documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found place there.
>
> Thanks
>
> - Venkat
>
> On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where we are with
> > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
> >
> > Kelvin.
> >
> > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered users.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Raymond
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
> > > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > <snip>
> > > >
> > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
> > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some guidances
> for
> > > >> cases
> > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered users) or
> > > >> documentation
> > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I also think all our content should be open to any registered user.
> We
> > > > want
> > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more likely to
> happen
> > if
> > > > we
> > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in patches for
> the
> > > > wiki
> > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we all can
> > monitor
> > > > the
> > > > changes?
> > > >
> > > > ...ant
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com>.
Hi Kelvin,
In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki - CWIKI. Infact
some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for SCA M3, some
documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found place there.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where we are with
> this and whether I should be migrating the content?
>
> Kelvin.
>
> On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered users.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raymond
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
> > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
> > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
> >
> >
> > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
> > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some guidances for
> > >> cases
> > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered users) or
> > >> documentation
> > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
> > >
> > >
> > > I also think all our content should be open to any registered user. We
> > > want
> > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more likely to happen
> if
> > > we
> > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in patches for the
> > > wiki
> > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we all can
> monitor
> > > the
> > > changes?
> > >
> > > ...ant
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where we are with
this and whether I should be migrating the content?
Kelvin.
On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered users.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
> To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
> Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>
>
> > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some guidances for
> >> cases
> >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered users) or
> >> documentation
> >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
> >
> >
> > I also think all our content should be open to any registered user. We
> > want
> > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more likely to happen if
> > we
> > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in patches for the
> > wiki
> > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we all can monitor
> > the
> > changes?
> >
> > ...ant
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Rick <cr...@gmail.com>.
Two concerns come to mind if we make THE website:
Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently our website is
in svn which covers that.
The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not "fancy" organized
etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?
I'm not against this, just cautious not being a wiki guru.
ant elder wrote:
> On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some guidances for
>> cases
>> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered users) or
>> documentation
>> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
>
>
> I also think all our content should be open to any registered user. We want
> everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more likely to happen if we
> make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in patches for the wiki
> :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we all can monitor the
> changes?
>
> ...ant
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered users.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
> On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some guidances for
>> cases
>> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered users) or
>> documentation
>> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
>
>
> I also think all our content should be open to any registered user. We
> want
> everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more likely to happen if
> we
> make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in patches for the
> wiki
> :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we all can monitor
> the
> changes?
>
> ...ant
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some guidances for cases
> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered users) or
> documentation
> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
I also think all our content should be open to any registered user. We want
everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more likely to happen if we
make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in patches for the wiki
:) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we all can monitor the
changes?
...ant
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
1) I found the following section has been REMOVED recently from
http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
h3. Why isn't wiki.apache.org listed with the other approved services?
The Confluence wiki was set up in May 2006, and we still consider it a pilot
program. Once we are certain that the installation is reliable, and we are
sure that sufficient volunteers are available to maintain the installation,
it would be promoted to an approved service. Other new services, like
moin-moin, went through the samne "burn-in" phase. At this point, it's "so
far so good" for Confluence. Over a dozen projects have created spaces, and
we have several ASF Members able to help with the server-side
administration, like installing updated releases. Of course, most
administrative tasks can be handled by Project volunteers from within
Confluence itself."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems to me as a positive sign that CWIKI is now mature.
2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some guidances for cases
that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered users) or documentation
site (open to folks with CLA on file).
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <jb...@apache.org>
To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
> What was the resolution on the support question?
>
> The old wiki is open to all registered users - why would we change that
> policy?
> --
> Jeremy
>
> On Jan 23, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>
>> Hi, Dan.
>>
>> The CWIKI site was set up recently with default permissions. Only users
>> in the tuscany-committers group have "edit" access to the TUSCANY space
>> so far.
>>
>> 1) I'll let the community decide what the appropriate access control we
>> should have, please express your opinions.
>>
>> Some seed questions:
>> a. What's the common practice set by ASF?
>> b. Should we open "edit" to committers or all of the registered users?
>>
>> 2) I can help update the ACL once we have a policy agreed.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Murphy" <dm...@googlemail.com>
>> To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:47 AM
>> Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I see the CWIKI site is up (http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/) but not
>>> open
>>> for public editing... shame 'cos I was hoping to write some stuff about
>>> getting started (I personally don't find the web site's getting started
>>> guide that great so thought that I'd have a bash on the wiki... c'est
>>> la
>>> vie)
>>>
>>> What's the plans now ? Is the CWiki only going to be open to tuscany
>>> commiters - or anyone who is registered (as per existing wiki) ?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> On 11/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> As the first step, I have filed a JIRA issue
>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1107) to request to
>>>> create a
>>>> space for Tuscany on the CWIKI site. Once it's created, we can start
>>>> to
>>>> play
>>>> with it and then decide if we should move.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Raymond
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Dan Murphy" <dm...@googlemail.com>
>>>> To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:51 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >I like the idead of a single (wiki based) site; it would be
>>>> better than
>>>> > having the current problem of overlap between wiki and website
>>>> - as per
>>>> > the
>>>> >
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/
>>>> msg09447.htmlthread.
>>>> ..
>>>> > If CXF have found it to work for them I think it would be a great
>>>> > plan
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 06/01/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Jim Marino wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >> For quite a while the Confluence wiki was not maintained by
>>>> ASF
>>>> >> >> infrastructure - it was very much use at your own risk.
>>>> There may >> >> be
>>>> >> >> enough people using it now that that may have changed but
>>>> it would
>>>> be
>>>> >> >> worth finding out.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> --
>>>> >> >> Jeremy
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> Hi,
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at
>>>> >> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany which is backed by
>>>> MoinMoinWiki.
>>>> I
>>>> >> >>> personally found it's not very productive to work this wiki.
>>>> >> >>> Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it seems to be more
>>>> attractive:
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
>>>> >> >>> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text"
>>>> editing >> >>> in
>>>> >> >>> addtion to "Wiki Markup"
>>>> >> >>> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
>>>> >> >>> * Comments
>>>> >> >>> * And more ...
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/
>>>> confluence. >> >>> You
>>>> >> >>> can see more details at
>>>> >> >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index.
>>>> Quite a >> >>> few
>>>> >> >>> projects use it to maintain their web sites and
>>>> documentations.
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our
>>>> existing
>>>> >> >>> contents over? We can take this chance to better organize our
>>>> >> >>> materials.
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> Thanks,
>>>> >> >>> Raymond
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> > I'd be in favor of this given Jeremy's point above. Perhaps
>>>> we could
>>>> >> > use CXF as a template to do this since it is very clean and
>>>> nicely
>>>> >> > organized?
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Jim
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> +1
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On a related note the CXF approach resolves the constant dilemma
>>>> between
>>>> >> 'Project home page' and 'Wiki', as their home page is a Wiki!
>>>> It would
>>>> >> be worth asking them what they think about the approach
>>>> they've taken
>>>> >> and if they're happy with it and recommend it to others.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thoughts?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Jean-Sebastien
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> -
>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
What was the resolution on the support question?
The old wiki is open to all registered users - why would we change
that policy?
--
Jeremy
On Jan 23, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi, Dan.
>
> The CWIKI site was set up recently with default permissions. Only
> users in the tuscany-committers group have "edit" access to the
> TUSCANY space so far.
>
> 1) I'll let the community decide what the appropriate access
> control we should have, please express your opinions.
>
> Some seed questions:
> a. What's the common practice set by ASF?
> b. Should we open "edit" to committers or all of the registered users?
>
> 2) I can help update the ACL once we have a policy agreed.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Murphy"
> <dm...@googlemail.com>
> To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see the CWIKI site is up (http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/) but
>> not open
>> for public editing... shame 'cos I was hoping to write some stuff
>> about
>> getting started (I personally don't find the web site's getting
>> started
>> guide that great so thought that I'd have a bash on the wiki...
>> c'est la
>> vie)
>>
>> What's the plans now ? Is the CWiki only going to be open to tuscany
>> commiters - or anyone who is registered (as per existing wiki) ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dan
>>
>> On 11/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As the first step, I have filed a JIRA issue
>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1107) to request to
>>> create a
>>> space for Tuscany on the CWIKI site. Once it's created, we can
>>> start to
>>> play
>>> with it and then decide if we should move.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Raymond
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Dan Murphy" <dm...@googlemail.com>
>>> To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:51 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>>>
>>>
>>> >I like the idead of a single (wiki based) site; it would be
>>> better than
>>> > having the current problem of overlap between wiki and website
>>> - as per
>>> > the
>>> >
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/
>>> msg09447.htmlthread.
>>> ..
>>> > If CXF have found it to work for them I think it would be a great
>>> > plan
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 06/01/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Jim Marino wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> For quite a while the Confluence wiki was not maintained by
>>> ASF
>>> >> >> infrastructure - it was very much use at your own risk.
>>> There may >> >> be
>>> >> >> enough people using it now that that may have changed but
>>> it would
>>> be
>>> >> >> worth finding out.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> --
>>> >> >> Jeremy
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> Hi,
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at
>>> >> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany which is backed by
>>> MoinMoinWiki.
>>> I
>>> >> >>> personally found it's not very productive to work this wiki.
>>> >> >>> Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it seems to be more
>>> attractive:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
>>> >> >>> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text"
>>> editing >> >>> in
>>> >> >>> addtion to "Wiki Markup"
>>> >> >>> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
>>> >> >>> * Comments
>>> >> >>> * And more ...
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/
>>> confluence. >> >>> You
>>> >> >>> can see more details at
>>> >> >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index.
>>> Quite a >> >>> few
>>> >> >>> projects use it to maintain their web sites and
>>> documentations.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our
>>> existing
>>> >> >>> contents over? We can take this chance to better organize our
>>> >> >>> materials.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Thanks,
>>> >> >>> Raymond
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> > I'd be in favor of this given Jeremy's point above. Perhaps
>>> we could
>>> >> > use CXF as a template to do this since it is very clean and
>>> nicely
>>> >> > organized?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Jim
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> On a related note the CXF approach resolves the constant dilemma
>>> between
>>> >> 'Project home page' and 'Wiki', as their home page is a Wiki!
>>> It would
>>> >> be worth asking them what they think about the approach
>>> they've taken
>>> >> and if they're happy with it and recommend it to others.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thoughts?
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Jean-Sebastien
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Dan.
The CWIKI site was set up recently with default permissions. Only users in
the tuscany-committers group have "edit" access to the TUSCANY space so far.
1) I'll let the community decide what the appropriate access control we
should have, please express your opinions.
Some seed questions:
a. What's the common practice set by ASF?
b. Should we open "edit" to committers or all of the registered users?
2) I can help update the ACL once we have a policy agreed.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Murphy" <dm...@googlemail.com>
To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
> Hi,
>
> I see the CWIKI site is up (http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/) but not open
> for public editing... shame 'cos I was hoping to write some stuff about
> getting started (I personally don't find the web site's getting started
> guide that great so thought that I'd have a bash on the wiki... c'est la
> vie)
>
> What's the plans now ? Is the CWiki only going to be open to tuscany
> commiters - or anyone who is registered (as per existing wiki) ?
>
> Cheers,
> Dan
>
> On 11/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As the first step, I have filed a JIRA issue
>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1107) to request to create a
>> space for Tuscany on the CWIKI site. Once it's created, we can start to
>> play
>> with it and then decide if we should move.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dan Murphy" <dm...@googlemail.com>
>> To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:51 PM
>> Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>>
>>
>> >I like the idead of a single (wiki based) site; it would be better than
>> > having the current problem of overlap between wiki and website - as per
>> > the
>> >
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg09447.htmlthread.
>> ..
>> > If CXF have found it to work for them I think it would be a great
>> > plan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 06/01/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Jim Marino wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> For quite a while the Confluence wiki was not maintained by ASF
>> >> >> infrastructure - it was very much use at your own risk. There may
>> >> >> be
>> >> >> enough people using it now that that may have changed but it would
>> be
>> >> >> worth finding out.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Jeremy
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Hi,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at
>> >> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany which is backed by MoinMoinWiki.
>> I
>> >> >>> personally found it's not very productive to work this wiki.
>> >> >>> Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it seems to be more
>> attractive:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
>> >> >>> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text" editing
>> >> >>> in
>> >> >>> addtion to "Wiki Markup"
>> >> >>> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
>> >> >>> * Comments
>> >> >>> * And more ...
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence.
>> >> >>> You
>> >> >>> can see more details at
>> >> >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index. Quite a
>> >> >>> few
>> >> >>> projects use it to maintain their web sites and documentations.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our existing
>> >> >>> contents over? We can take this chance to better organize our
>> >> >>> materials.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Thanks,
>> >> >>> Raymond
>> >> >>>
>> >> > I'd be in favor of this given Jeremy's point above. Perhaps we could
>> >> > use CXF as a template to do this since it is very clean and nicely
>> >> > organized?
>> >> >
>> >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/
>> >> >
>> >> > Jim
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> On a related note the CXF approach resolves the constant dilemma
>> between
>> >> 'Project home page' and 'Wiki', as their home page is a Wiki! It would
>> >> be worth asking them what they think about the approach they've taken
>> >> and if they're happy with it and recommend it to others.
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jean-Sebastien
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Dan Murphy <dm...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
I see the CWIKI site is up (http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/) but not open
for public editing... shame 'cos I was hoping to write some stuff about
getting started (I personally don't find the web site's getting started
guide that great so thought that I'd have a bash on the wiki... c'est la
vie)
What's the plans now ? Is the CWiki only going to be open to tuscany
commiters - or anyone who is registered (as per existing wiki) ?
Cheers,
Dan
On 11/01/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As the first step, I have filed a JIRA issue
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1107) to request to create a
> space for Tuscany on the CWIKI site. Once it's created, we can start to
> play
> with it and then decide if we should move.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Murphy" <dm...@googlemail.com>
> To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>
>
> >I like the idead of a single (wiki based) site; it would be better than
> > having the current problem of overlap between wiki and website - as per
> > the
> >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg09447.htmlthread.
> ..
> > If CXF have found it to work for them I think it would be a great
> > plan
> >
> >
> >
> > On 06/01/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Jim Marino wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> For quite a while the Confluence wiki was not maintained by ASF
> >> >> infrastructure - it was very much use at your own risk. There may be
> >> >> enough people using it now that that may have changed but it would
> be
> >> >> worth finding out.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Jeremy
> >> >>
> >> >> On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hi,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at
> >> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany which is backed by MoinMoinWiki.
> I
> >> >>> personally found it's not very productive to work this wiki.
> >> >>> Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it seems to be more
> attractive:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
> >> >>> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text" editing in
> >> >>> addtion to "Wiki Markup"
> >> >>> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
> >> >>> * Comments
> >> >>> * And more ...
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence. You
> >> >>> can see more details at
> >> >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index. Quite a few
> >> >>> projects use it to maintain their web sites and documentations.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our existing
> >> >>> contents over? We can take this chance to better organize our
> >> >>> materials.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks,
> >> >>> Raymond
> >> >>>
> >> > I'd be in favor of this given Jeremy's point above. Perhaps we could
> >> > use CXF as a template to do this since it is very clean and nicely
> >> > organized?
> >> >
> >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/
> >> >
> >> > Jim
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On a related note the CXF approach resolves the constant dilemma
> between
> >> 'Project home page' and 'Wiki', as their home page is a Wiki! It would
> >> be worth asking them what they think about the approach they've taken
> >> and if they're happy with it and recommend it to others.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Sebastien
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
As the first step, I have filed a JIRA issue
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1107) to request to create a
space for Tuscany on the CWIKI site. Once it's created, we can start to play
with it and then decide if we should move.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Murphy" <dm...@googlemail.com>
To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
>I like the idead of a single (wiki based) site; it would be better than
> having the current problem of overlap between wiki and website - as per
> the
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg09447.htmlthread...
> If CXF have found it to work for them I think it would be a great
> plan
>
>
>
> On 06/01/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Jim Marino wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> >
>> >> For quite a while the Confluence wiki was not maintained by ASF
>> >> infrastructure - it was very much use at your own risk. There may be
>> >> enough people using it now that that may have changed but it would be
>> >> worth finding out.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jeremy
>> >>
>> >> On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at
>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany which is backed by MoinMoinWiki. I
>> >>> personally found it's not very productive to work this wiki.
>> >>> Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it seems to be more attractive:
>> >>>
>> >>> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
>> >>> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text" editing in
>> >>> addtion to "Wiki Markup"
>> >>> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
>> >>> * Comments
>> >>> * And more ...
>> >>>
>> >>> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence. You
>> >>> can see more details at
>> >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index. Quite a few
>> >>> projects use it to maintain their web sites and documentations.
>> >>>
>> >>> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our existing
>> >>> contents over? We can take this chance to better organize our
>> >>> materials.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Raymond
>> >>>
>> > I'd be in favor of this given Jeremy's point above. Perhaps we could
>> > use CXF as a template to do this since it is very clean and nicely
>> > organized?
>> >
>> > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/
>> >
>> > Jim
>> >
>> >
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On a related note the CXF approach resolves the constant dilemma between
>> 'Project home page' and 'Wiki', as their home page is a Wiki! It would
>> be worth asking them what they think about the approach they've taken
>> and if they're happy with it and recommend it to others.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Sebastien
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Dan Murphy <dm...@googlemail.com>.
I like the idead of a single (wiki based) site; it would be better than
having the current problem of overlap between wiki and website - as per the
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg09447.htmlthread...
If CXF have found it to work for them I think it would be a great
plan
On 06/01/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Jim Marino wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> >
> >> For quite a while the Confluence wiki was not maintained by ASF
> >> infrastructure - it was very much use at your own risk. There may be
> >> enough people using it now that that may have changed but it would be
> >> worth finding out.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jeremy
> >>
> >> On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at
> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany which is backed by MoinMoinWiki. I
> >>> personally found it's not very productive to work this wiki.
> >>> Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it seems to be more attractive:
> >>>
> >>> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
> >>> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text" editing in
> >>> addtion to "Wiki Markup"
> >>> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
> >>> * Comments
> >>> * And more ...
> >>>
> >>> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence. You
> >>> can see more details at
> >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index. Quite a few
> >>> projects use it to maintain their web sites and documentations.
> >>>
> >>> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our existing
> >>> contents over? We can take this chance to better organize our
> >>> materials.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Raymond
> >>>
> > I'd be in favor of this given Jeremy's point above. Perhaps we could
> > use CXF as a template to do this since it is very clean and nicely
> > organized?
> >
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
>
> +1
>
> On a related note the CXF approach resolves the constant dilemma between
> 'Project home page' and 'Wiki', as their home page is a Wiki! It would
> be worth asking them what they think about the approach they've taken
> and if they're happy with it and recommend it to others.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
Jim Marino wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>> For quite a while the Confluence wiki was not maintained by ASF
>> infrastructure - it was very much use at your own risk. There may be
>> enough people using it now that that may have changed but it would be
>> worth finding out.
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy
>>
>> On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany which is backed by MoinMoinWiki. I
>>> personally found it's not very productive to work this wiki.
>>> Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it seems to be more attractive:
>>>
>>> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
>>> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text" editing in
>>> addtion to "Wiki Markup"
>>> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
>>> * Comments
>>> * And more ...
>>>
>>> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence. You
>>> can see more details at
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index. Quite a few
>>> projects use it to maintain their web sites and documentations.
>>>
>>> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our existing
>>> contents over? We can take this chance to better organize our
>>> materials.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Raymond
>>>
> I'd be in favor of this given Jeremy's point above. Perhaps we could
> use CXF as a template to do this since it is very clean and nicely
> organized?
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/
>
> Jim
>
>
+1
On a related note the CXF approach resolves the constant dilemma between
'Project home page' and 'Wiki', as their home page is a Wiki! It would
be worth asking them what they think about the approach they've taken
and if they're happy with it and recommend it to others.
Thoughts?
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com>.
On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> For quite a while the Confluence wiki was not maintained by ASF
> infrastructure - it was very much use at your own risk. There may
> be enough people using it now that that may have changed but it
> would be worth finding out.
>
> --
> Jeremy
>
> On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at http://wiki.apache.org/ws/
>> Tuscany which is backed by MoinMoinWiki. I personally found it's
>> not very productive to work this wiki. Recently I tried Confluence
>> wiki and it seems to be more attractive:
>>
>> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
>> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text" editing
>> in addtion to "Wiki Markup"
>> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
>> * Comments
>> * And more ...
>>
>> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence.
>> You can see more details at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
>> display/CWIKI/Index. Quite a few projects use it to maintain their
>> web sites and documentations.
>>
>> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our existing
>> contents over? We can take this chance to better organize our
>> materials.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>>
I'd be in favor of this given Jeremy's point above. Perhaps we could
use CXF as a template to do this since it is very clean and nicely
organized?
http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
For quite a while the Confluence wiki was not maintained by ASF
infrastructure - it was very much use at your own risk. There may be
enough people using it now that that may have changed but it would be
worth finding out.
--
Jeremy
On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at http://wiki.apache.org/ws/
> Tuscany which is backed by MoinMoinWiki. I personally found it's
> not very productive to work this wiki. Recently I tried Confluence
> wiki and it seems to be more attractive:
>
> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text" editing in
> addtion to "Wiki Markup"
> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
> * Comments
> * And more ...
>
> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence. You
> can see more details at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/
> CWIKI/Index. Quite a few projects use it to maintain their web
> sites and documentations.
>
> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our existing
> contents over? We can take this chance to better organize our
> materials.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org