You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Rasmus Haslund <ra...@nowaco.com> on 2008/08/08 10:29:39 UTC
Using DNSWL.org with Icewarp Merak's SpamAssassin
Hi all,
I have tried without luck to get any support from Icewarp in this manner
and instead hope someone on the list can be of assistance.
I am trying to use DNSWL in our local.cf and have copied the
configuration from their website:
header __RCVD_IN_DNSWL eval:check_rbl('dnswl-firsttrusted',
'list.dnswl.org.')
header RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW eval:check_rbl_sub('dnswl-firsttrusted',
'127.0.\d+.1')
describe RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low trust
tflags RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW nice net
header RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED eval:check_rbl_sub('dnswl-firsttrusted',
'127.0.\d+.2')
describe RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
medium trust
tflags RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED nice net
header RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI eval:check_rbl_sub('dnswl-firsttrusted',
'127.0.\d+.3')
describe RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
high trust
tflags RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI nice net
score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -1
score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -10
score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI -100
However it seems SpamAssassin is not using the configuration.
Any ideas on what could be going wrong?
Thank you all in advance.
Best Regards
Rasmus Haslund
NOWACO A/S
Prinsensgade 15
9100 Aalborg, Denmark
Phone: +45 96 30 80 80
Direct: +45 96 30 80 83
Mobile: +45 40 59 94 94
Fax: +45 96 30 80 90
www.nowaco.com
RE: Using DNSWL.org with Icewarp Merak's SpamAssassin
Posted by Rasmus Haslund <ra...@nowaco.com>.
Hi Matthias,
Thank you for taking time to respond to me.
>From the headers our SpamAssassin is creating I can see
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (1.0).
We are also using several URI lists that are configured in the same
local.cf file as the DNSWL configuration and those URI lists are
successfully used - hence I am very confident SpamAssassin is actually
using this file.
Unfortunately the supporters are Icewarp has chosen to ignore my request
for support on this issue.
In that light I have made a post on their forum instead:
http://forum.icewarp.com/Implementing_DNSWL%25org_into_SpamAssassin_loca
l%25cf/m_661/tm.htm
I know people working for Icewarp look and respond in the forum so there
is a good chance you could reach them there.
If they eventually respond to my support ticket I will refer them to
you.
Best Regards
NOWACO A/S
Rasmus Haslund
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthias Leisi [mailto:matthias@leisi.net]
Sent: 8. august 2008 10:45
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using DNSWL.org with Icewarp Merak's SpamAssassin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rasmus Haslund schrieb:
| I have tried without luck to get any support from Icewarp in this
| manner and instead hope someone on the list can be of assistance.
|
| I am trying to use DNSWL in our local.cf and have copied the
| configuration from their website:
I don't know which version of SpamAssassin is used by Icewarp, but
dnswl.org rules are part of SA's default ruleset since 3.2.0.
| However it seems SpamAssassin is not using the configuration.
| Any ideas on what could be going wrong?
Is SA looking at the same .cf file which you are editing?
- -- Matthias, for dnswl.org
PS: If you do have a contact at Icewarp, could you please refer them to
me (or to admins /at/ dnswl.org)? Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFInAd9xbHw2nyi/okRAsuKAJ9yRDZ+89vrbfUevmNAsXvhKVoWaACdHLPX
65eYKbIr+BWfKLVQfLIKNeQ=
=VqGV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Using DNSWL.org with Icewarp Merak's SpamAssassin
Posted by Matthias Leisi <ma...@leisi.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rasmus Haslund schrieb:
| I have tried without luck to get any support from Icewarp in this manner
| and instead hope someone on the list can be of assistance.
|
| I am trying to use DNSWL in our local.cf and have copied the
| configuration from their website:
I don't know which version of SpamAssassin is used by Icewarp, but
dnswl.org rules are part of SA's default ruleset since 3.2.0.
| However it seems SpamAssassin is not using the configuration.
| Any ideas on what could be going wrong?
Is SA looking at the same .cf file which you are editing?
- -- Matthias, for dnswl.org
PS: If you do have a contact at Icewarp, could you please refer them to
me (or to admins /at/ dnswl.org)? Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFInAd9xbHw2nyi/okRAsuKAJ9yRDZ+89vrbfUevmNAsXvhKVoWaACdHLPX
65eYKbIr+BWfKLVQfLIKNeQ=
=VqGV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----