Re: Root element of WSDL 2.0,{definition or description}

[Anne Thomas Manes <at...@gmail.com>]

Then you need to publish a new working draft...


On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:47:45 -0500, Tom Jordahl <to...@macromedia.com> wrote:
> 
> I believe we (the WSDL working group) changed the top level element of WSDL
> 2.0 to "description" a month or two ago.
> 
> This gives us 2 things
>  1. The Web Service DESCRIPTION Language now contains a description.
>  2. A nice easy way to differentiate between WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0
> 
> --
> Tom Jordahl
> Macromedia Server Development
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:atmanes@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 9:27 AM
> > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Root element of WSDL 2.0,{definition or description}
> >
> > Actually, per the schema and the Part 1 specification, the root
> > element is <definitions/>. Obviously, the primer is in error.
> >
> > -Anne
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:43:44 -0800 (PST), Rajdeep Dua
> > <du...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all
> > > WSDL schema says that root element of a WSDL 2.0
> > > document should be <definition/>
> > > http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl
> > >
> > > but WSDL 2.0 primer examples show it as <description/>
> > >
> > > Would appreciate if any body could clarify
> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-primer-20041221
> > >
> > > rgds
> > > Rajdeep
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
> > > http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> > >
>