You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@openwhisk.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2018/11/02 20:17:46 UTC
[GitHub] sven-lange-last commented on issue #4082: Rename prewarmed
containers
sven-lange-last commented on issue #4082: Rename prewarmed containers
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4082#issuecomment-435496601
@dgrove-oss IBM is partly still at Docker 1.12 - but no more with production environment.
Even if we `docker rename` pre-warmed containers asynchronously in the container proxy, there is a chance that Docker operations on the same container are run consecutively by the Docker daemon. And if not consecutively, there are probably per-container or global locks that prevent fully parallel execution.
We definitely need performance tests to evaluate the effects of a `docker rename`.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services