You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/02/10 18:03:42 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-17624) Address late review of
HBASE-6721, rsgroups feature
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15861606#comment-15861606 ]
Andrew Purtell edited comment on HBASE-17624 at 2/10/17 6:03 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
bq. a guava type is part of our public API
I don't have a strong preference for handling this particular issue, but will note that we also have HBASE-15982. Might be good to address the problem of guava types in public and LP APIs everywhere as a blocker for a 2.0 release.
was (Author: apurtell):
bq. a guava type is part of our public API
I don't have a strong preference for handling this particular issue, but will note that we also have HBASE-15982. Might be good to address the problem of guava types in public API everywhere as a blocker for a 2.0 release.
> Address late review of HBASE-6721, rsgroups feature
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17624
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17624
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: rsgroup
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
>
> An internal review by [~busbey] and [~appy] turned up a bunch of good findings going over HBASE-6721. They found some really good stuff a guava type is part of our public API and concurrency in a few core classes is inconsistent.
> Patch coming.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)