[jira] [Updated] (YARN-3816) [Aggregation] App-level aggregation and accumulation for YARN system metrics

["Junping Du (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Junping Du updated YARN-3816:
-----------------------------
    Summary: [Aggregation] App-level aggregation and accumulation for YARN system metrics  (was: [Aggregation] App-level Aggregation for YARN system metrics)

> [Aggregation] App-level aggregation and accumulation for YARN system metrics
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3816
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3816
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: timelineserver
>            Reporter: Junping Du
>            Assignee: Junping Du
>         Attachments: Application Level Aggregation of Timeline Data.pdf, YARN-3816-YARN-2928-v1.patch, YARN-3816-YARN-2928-v2.1.patch, YARN-3816-YARN-2928-v2.2.patch, YARN-3816-YARN-2928-v2.3.patch, YARN-3816-YARN-2928-v2.patch, YARN-3816-poc-v1.patch, YARN-3816-poc-v2.patch
>
>
> We need application level aggregation of Timeline data:
> - To present end user aggregated states for each application, include: resource (CPU, Memory) consumption across all containers, number of containers launched/completed/failed, etc. We need this for apps while they are running as well as when they are done.
> - Also, framework specific metrics, e.g. HDFS_BYTES_READ, should be aggregated to show details of states in framework level.
> - Other level (Flow/User/Queue) aggregation can be more efficient to be based on Application-level aggregations rather than raw entity-level data as much less raws need to scan (with filter out non-aggregated entities, like: events, configurations, etc.).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)