You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@storm.apache.org by Patrick Wiener <pa...@web.de> on 2014/08/01 01:10:18 UTC
Storm useable for video processing??
Hello everybody,
I’ll ask straightforward:
Has anybody heard or read something about Storm being used for real-time video/image processing? and could provide some information (sources, code, …)
Reason: I’m working on a project concerning live-stream analysis of video data. It should be investigated wether Storm could be a promising approach.
Thank you very much in advance!
Patrick
Re: Storm useable for video processing??
Posted by Philip Shon <ph...@gmail.com>.
I remember seeing that Comcast utilizes Storm in some capacity for their IP
video (http://strataconf.com/stratany2013/public/schedule/detail/30915) but
judging by this talk description, they maybe just using it for analytics.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Patrick Wiener <pa...@web.de>
wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I’ll ask straightforward:
> *Has anybody heard or read something about Storm being used for real-time
> video/image processing? and could provide some information (sources, code,
> …)*
>
> Reason: I’m working on a project concerning live-stream analysis of video
> data. It should be investigated wether Storm could be a promising approach.
>
> Thank you very much in advance!
> Patrick
>
Re: Storm useable for video processing??
Posted by Michael Rose <mi...@fullcontact.com>.
There's no reason you couldn't. If you look in the archives there was
someone else who'd managed to do some video processing with Storm.
If you make things work, consider sharing a blog post -- that'd be really
great stuff! :)
Michael Rose (@Xorlev <https://twitter.com/xorlev>)
Senior Platform Engineer, FullContact <http://www.fullcontact.com/>
michael@fullcontact.com
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Andrew Xor <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Well it depends on your expectations really and your application's needs.
> If you can indeed transform the video feed (frames/blocks w/e) into
> break-able tuples then you could process it using storm. Although I am
> afraid that you will have to set a realistic view on your expectations
> because usually video processing and feature extraction is quite taxing on
> hardware. This (imho) will result in a (very) noticeable latency increase
> in your processing tuple throughput... but other than that you could use
> storm; after all video is just data.... albeit a lot.
>
> Hope this helped.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Patrick Wiener <pa...@web.de>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I’ll ask straightforward:
>> *Has anybody heard or read something about Storm being used for real-time
>> video/image processing? and could provide some information (sources, code,
>> …)*
>>
>> Reason: I’m working on a project concerning live-stream analysis of video
>> data. It should be investigated wether Storm could be a promising approach.
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance!
>> Patrick
>>
>
>
Re: Storm useable for video processing??
Posted by Andrew Xor <an...@gmail.com>.
Hey,
Well it depends on your expectations really and your application's needs.
If you can indeed transform the video feed (frames/blocks w/e) into
break-able tuples then you could process it using storm. Although I am
afraid that you will have to set a realistic view on your expectations
because usually video processing and feature extraction is quite taxing on
hardware. This (imho) will result in a (very) noticeable latency increase
in your processing tuple throughput... but other than that you could use
storm; after all video is just data.... albeit a lot.
Hope this helped.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Patrick Wiener <pa...@web.de>
wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I’ll ask straightforward:
> *Has anybody heard or read something about Storm being used for real-time
> video/image processing? and could provide some information (sources, code,
> …)*
>
> Reason: I’m working on a project concerning live-stream analysis of video
> data. It should be investigated wether Storm could be a promising approach.
>
> Thank you very much in advance!
> Patrick
>