[GitHub] [tinkerpop] Cole-Greer commented on a diff in pull request #2054: Proposal to add native transactions

["Cole-Greer (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

Cole-Greer commented on code in PR #2054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2054#discussion_r1186278834


##########
docs/src/dev/future/proposal-transaction-4.asciidoc:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+////
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+(the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+limitations under the License.
+////
+image::apache-tinkerpop-logo.png[width=500,link="https://tinkerpop.apache.org"]
+
+*x.y.z - Proposal 4*
+
+== Tinkerpop native transaction support
+
+=== Introduction
+Now, if you need to use transactions in tinkerpop, the only solution is to use the Neo4J plugin. Unfortunately, this plugin has not been updated for a long time and is only compatible with Neo4J version 3.4, which reached end of life in March, 2020.
+
+=== Motivation
+We would like to propose to implement native Tinkerpop transaction support. Users will be able to use transactions without the outdated Neo4J plugin.
+
+=== Assumptions
+
+* Need to reuse existing code as much as possible.
+* Users should be able to work both with and without transactions.
+* Transaction implementation should not have additional external dependencies.
+* Existing drivers should work without changes.
+
+=== Specifications
+==== Design Overview
+The main changes relate to TinkerGraph, we need to make a similar solution but with transaction support. I think TinkerGraph should be unchanged because for many users performance will be more important.
+I think by default I can make 2 configurations on Gremlin Server and users themselves will choose what they need, TinkerGraph or TinkerTransactionGraph.

Review Comment:
   Will users be able to run an embedded TinkerTransactionGraph?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@tinkerpop.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org