You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@avro.apache.org by "Ryan Skraba (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/06/02 17:42:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (AVRO-3374) [Java] Fully qualified type reference "ns.int" loses namespace.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ryan Skraba updated AVRO-3374:
------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 1.12.0

> [Java] Fully qualified type reference "ns.int" loses namespace.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AVRO-3374
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3374
>             Project: Apache Avro
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: java
>    Affects Versions: 1.11.0
>            Reporter: Ryan Skraba
>            Assignee: Christophe Le Saec
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-requests-available
>             Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>         Attachments: AVRO-3374.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> While brainstorming for AVRO-3370, I came across this special case where a type-reference could be considered ambiguous if the SDK is not careful when simplifying inherited namespaces:
> {code:json}
> {
>   "type" : "record",
>   "name" : "ns.int",
>   "fields" : [ 
>     {"name" : "value", "type" : "int"}, 
>     {"name" : "next", "type" : [ "null", "ns.int" ]}
>   ]
> }
> {code}
> In Java, if this code is parsed, it works as expected (as a linked list).
> If the schema is turned to a String using toString(), the namespace is dropped off the last {*}{{ns.int}}{*}, turning it into the primitive. That string can still be parsed into a Schema, but the "round-trip" modifies the schema in an incompatible way.
> That namespace shouldn't be dropped when producing the JSON string representing the Schema in Java.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)