You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Allen Wang <al...@gmail.com> on 2018/04/02 17:34:04 UTC

Re: [VOTE] KIP-272: Add API version tag to broker's RequestsPerSec metric

Thanks everybody for voting. With 3 binding and 4 non-binding votes, I will
mark the KIP as accepted.

Thanks,
Allen


On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 7:11 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <ew...@confluent.io>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> The incompatibility is unfortunate, but seems unlikely to cause a problem
> in practice. Let's just make sure there's a note in the upgrade notes about
> the incompatibility when we have a PR for this.
>
> -Ewen
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Allen,
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation. That's a great point. Could you add that to
> the
> > rejected section of the KIP.  +1 on this KIP.
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Allen Wang <al...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jun,
> > >
> > > I think this KIP helps to gain insight into how many clients have been
> > > upgraded *before* the we decide to upgrade the message format. In other
> > > words, users will know if they will pay down conversion cost before
> > message
> > > format upgrade. It is about making an informed decision. To be
> > > conservative, users can wait until all clients have been upgraded
> before
> > > changing message format, which will guarantee zero down conversion
> cost.
> > >
> > > While for the KIP you mentioned, users will only know the cost of down
> > > conversion after format upgrade, which may be too late.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Allen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, Allen,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > > >
> > > > It seems the main motivation of the KIP is to estimate the ratio of
> the
> > > > clients doing down conversion. I am wondering if we can do that by
> > > relying
> > > > on the metrics we added in 1.0.0 (
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > 188+-+Add+new+metrics+to+support+health+checks#KIP-188-
> > > > Addnewmetricstosupporthealthchecks-Messageconversionrateandtime).
> > > > This metric reports the message rate of down conversion. By comparing
> > > this
> > > > to the message rate of all consumers, you can roughly estimate the
> > ratio
> > > of
> > > > consumers still needing down conversion. Does that cover the main
> thing
> > > > that you want from this KIP?
> > > >
> > > > Jun
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Allen Wang <al...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to start voting for KIP-272:  Add API version tag to
> > > > broker's
> > > > > RequestsPerSec metric.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > 272%3A+Add+API+version+tag+to+broker%27s+RequestsPerSec+metric
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Allen
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>