You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@archiva.apache.org by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> on 2008/09/14 03:25:37 UTC
branch cleanup
Hi,
Which of the branches are still active?
I think the following are active:
* MRM-124 (but will be merged shortly)
* archiva-1.1.x
* archiva-database-decoupling
And the inactive that can be deleted:
* MRM-541
* archiva-0.9
* archiva-1.0.x
* archiva-MRM-239
* archiva-backend-security (Joakim, was this merged in, or is there
still work in there we can use?)
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: branch cleanup
Posted by James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>.
Wendy,
It should reflect the last tag - so yeah it could be removed.
James
On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 17:59 -0700, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 5:34 PM, James William Dumay
> <ja...@atlassian.com> wrote:
> > Why must the archiva-1.0.x branch be removed? Cant it be kept for
> > historical reasons?
>
> Is there anything on the 1.0.x branch that was not in the last
> release, or does it effectively duplicate that tag?
>
Re: branch cleanup
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 5:34 PM, James William Dumay
<ja...@atlassian.com> wrote:
> Why must the archiva-1.0.x branch be removed? Cant it be kept for
> historical reasons?
Is there anything on the 1.0.x branch that was not in the last
release, or does it effectively duplicate that tag?
--
Wendy
Re: branch cleanup
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
I figured these should just be the active branches. We have the tags
for the releases. "Removing" the branch just removes the reference to
it's tip which isn't really useful to us now, just the points along
it's history that will always be there.
But I don't feel particularly strongly about it, just a bit of a neat
freak :)
- Brett
On 15/09/2008, at 10:34 AM, James William Dumay wrote:
> Why must the archiva-1.0.x branch be removed? Cant it be kept for
> historical reasons?
>
> James
>
> On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 11:25 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Which of the branches are still active?
>>
>> I think the following are active:
>> * MRM-124 (but will be merged shortly)
>> * archiva-1.1.x
>> * archiva-database-decoupling
>>
>> And the inactive that can be deleted:
>> * MRM-541
>> * archiva-0.9
>> * archiva-1.0.x
>> * archiva-MRM-239
>> * archiva-backend-security (Joakim, was this merged in, or is there
>> still work in there we can use?)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brett
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>> brett@apache.org
>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>
>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: branch cleanup
Posted by James William Dumay <ja...@atlassian.com>.
Why must the archiva-1.0.x branch be removed? Cant it be kept for
historical reasons?
James
On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 11:25 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Which of the branches are still active?
>
> I think the following are active:
> * MRM-124 (but will be merged shortly)
> * archiva-1.1.x
> * archiva-database-decoupling
>
> And the inactive that can be deleted:
> * MRM-541
> * archiva-0.9
> * archiva-1.0.x
> * archiva-MRM-239
> * archiva-backend-security (Joakim, was this merged in, or is there
> still work in there we can use?)
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>