You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> on 2010/09/01 11:59:01 UTC
Re: Removing deprecated and unused code?
BTW I'm making pretty good progress clearing out the code Ted
mentions. Any comments?
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that there are probably three classes of inherited math code now.
> One class is the stuff
> that we kinda sorta plan to resurrect, another is the stuff that we will be
> replacing, but which is
> needed to avoid compile errors in class I and the final class is code that
> we really should delete.
>
Re: Removing deprecated and unused code?
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
FYI, seems the Carrot2 guys might use some of the proposed classes that are being removed. Hopefully, Dawid or Stazsek will speak up.
-Grant
On Sep 1, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I opened an issue for promoting exponential and normal distributions. I am
> traveling the rest of this week though so progress
> won't be super fast (it is half done now).
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 to getting this stuff cleaned out. If you're doing it now we might
>> as well get this in for 0.4
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> BTW I'm making pretty good progress clearing out the code Ted
>>> mentions. Any comments?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> I think that there are probably three classes of inherited math code
>> now.
>>>> One class is the stuff
>>>> that we kinda sorta plan to resurrect, another is the stuff that we will
>> be
>>>> replacing, but which is
>>>> needed to avoid compile errors in class I and the final class is code
>> that
>>>> we really should delete.
>>>>
>>>
>>
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
Re: Removing deprecated and unused code?
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
I opened an issue for promoting exponential and normal distributions. I am
traveling the rest of this week though so progress
won't be super fast (it is half done now).
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to getting this stuff cleaned out. If you're doing it now we might
> as well get this in for 0.4
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > BTW I'm making pretty good progress clearing out the code Ted
> > mentions. Any comments?
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I think that there are probably three classes of inherited math code
> now.
> >> One class is the stuff
> >> that we kinda sorta plan to resurrect, another is the stuff that we will
> be
> >> replacing, but which is
> >> needed to avoid compile errors in class I and the final class is code
> that
> >> we really should delete.
> >>
> >
>
Re: Removing deprecated and unused code?
Posted by Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com>.
+1 to getting this stuff cleaned out. If you're doing it now we might
as well get this in for 0.4
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW I'm making pretty good progress clearing out the code Ted
> mentions. Any comments?
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think that there are probably three classes of inherited math code now.
>> One class is the stuff
>> that we kinda sorta plan to resurrect, another is the stuff that we will be
>> replacing, but which is
>> needed to avoid compile errors in class I and the final class is code that
>> we really should delete.
>>
>
Re: Removing deprecated and unused code?
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
Would it help you for us to hold back commits for a day?
Or would the opposite strategy help of taking turns on small pieces of this
change at a time?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW I'm making pretty good progress clearing out the code Ted
> mentions. Any comments?
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I think that there are probably three classes of inherited math code now.
> > One class is the stuff
> > that we kinda sorta plan to resurrect, another is the stuff that we will
> be
> > replacing, but which is
> > needed to avoid compile errors in class I and the final class is code
> that
> > we really should delete.
> >
>