You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@kvrocks.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/03 05:15:48 UTC
[GitHub] [incubator-kvrocks] hy2014 created a discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
GitHub user hy2014 created a discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
just as title, it is hard for user build on centos7, many dep need to upgrade, it may not welcome for users.
GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/incubator-kvrocks/discussions/1152
----
This is an automatically sent email for issues@kvrocks.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: issues-unsubscribe@kvrocks.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-kvrocks] PragmaTwice edited a comment on the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
GitHub user PragmaTwice edited a comment on the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
I think the provided docker image is more general and easy to use. It is hard to build binary packages for all Linux distributions.
And I want to talk more about binary packages like rpm or deb. Actually even we build some rpm or deb packages, it is still hard to be available to all distributions and distribution versions to use it. For example, the shared-linked glibc version is well-known hard to handle.
GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/incubator-kvrocks/discussions/1152#discussioncomment-4297513
----
This is an automatically sent email for issues@kvrocks.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: issues-unsubscribe@kvrocks.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-kvrocks] PragmaTwice edited a comment on the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
GitHub user PragmaTwice edited a comment on the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
I think the provided docker image is more general and easy to use. It is hard to build binary packages for all Linux distributions.
And I want to talk more about binary packages like rpm or deb. Actually even we build some rpm or deb packages, it is still hard to be available to all distributions and distribution versions (which support this package format) to use it. For example, the shared-linked glibc version is well-known hard to handle.
So I prefer to encourage users to use the docker image or build kvrocks on the environment where you will really use it.
GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/incubator-kvrocks/discussions/1152#discussioncomment-4297513
----
This is an automatically sent email for issues@kvrocks.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: issues-unsubscribe@kvrocks.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-kvrocks] tisonkun edited a comment on the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
GitHub user tisonkun edited a comment on the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
@hy2014 do you want a prebuilt RPM installer for Kvrocks 2.2.0?
GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/incubator-kvrocks/discussions/1152#discussioncomment-4297485
----
This is an automatically sent email for issues@kvrocks.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: issues-unsubscribe@kvrocks.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-kvrocks] PragmaTwice edited a comment on the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
GitHub user PragmaTwice edited a comment on the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
I think the provided docker image is more general and easy to use. It is hard to build binary packages for all Linux distributions.
And I want to talk more about binary packages like rpm or deb. Actually even we build some rpm or deb packages, it is still hard to be available to all distributions and distribution versions (which support this package format) to use it. For example, the shared-linked glibc version is well-known hard to handle.
GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/incubator-kvrocks/discussions/1152#discussioncomment-4297513
----
This is an automatically sent email for issues@kvrocks.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: issues-unsubscribe@kvrocks.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-kvrocks] PragmaTwice added a comment to the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
GitHub user PragmaTwice added a comment to the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
I think the provided docker image is more general and easy to use. It is hard to build binary packages for all Linux distributions.
And I want to talk more about binary packages like rpm or deb.
GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/incubator-kvrocks/discussions/1152#discussioncomment-4297513
----
This is an automatically sent email for issues@kvrocks.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: issues-unsubscribe@kvrocks.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-kvrocks] PragmaTwice edited a comment on the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
GitHub user PragmaTwice edited a comment on the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
I think the provided docker image is more general and easy to use. It is hard to build binary packages for all Linux distributions.
And I want to talk more about binary packages like rpm or deb. Actually even we build some rpm or deb packages, it is still hard to be available to all distributions and distribution versions to use it.
GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/incubator-kvrocks/discussions/1152#discussioncomment-4297513
----
This is an automatically sent email for issues@kvrocks.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: issues-unsubscribe@kvrocks.apache.org
[GitHub] [incubator-kvrocks] tisonkun added a comment to the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
GitHub user tisonkun added a comment to the discussion: no binary found in 2.2.0
@hy2014 do you want a prebuilt RPM installer for Kvrocks?
GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/incubator-kvrocks/discussions/1152#discussioncomment-4297485
----
This is an automatically sent email for issues@kvrocks.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: issues-unsubscribe@kvrocks.apache.org