You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jcp-open@apache.org by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> on 2010/05/04 11:27:33 UTC
OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
On 02/05/2010 18:49, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 5/2/10 8:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> There is no https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/osgi-tcks/ repo at the
>> moment. I can create one if you wish (you need full svn admin to do this
>> as it is at the root of the repo).
>>
>> The way /sun-tcks/ is organised, Daniel, Geir and I have read-write
>> access and anyone who has signed the sun NDA has read-only access.
>>
>> We can set-up /osgi-tcks/ however you wish. I assume it would be
>> read-write for you and read-only for TBD.
>>
>> Let me know if you want to go this route and if so, how you want the
>> repo set up and I'll get that done.
>>
>
> The OSGi Alliance doesn't call it a TCK, they call it a CT (compliance
> or conformance tests, I don't remember which), so if we want to use
> their terminology, we should use /osgi-cts/...but I guess it really
> doesn't matter to me.
>
> Sure, set me up with write access so I can maintain it and anyone else
> who wants to be able to do so. As far as read access, I think anyone
> signing an NDA can be granted read access regardless...I assume it is
> not necessary for us to distinguish why people submitted an NDA, so if
> you submit one you can have read access to all of it...
I assume this is a different NDA to the one folks sign to gain access to
the Sun TCKs. Where can I find a list of the folks that have signed the
relevant NDA?
Mark
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
BTW, I have a page describing the OSGi CTs on our wiki here:
http://felix.apache.org/site/using-the-osgi-compliance-tests.html
Not sure if the details will change for the EE CTs...
-> richard
On 5/7/10 15:50, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 5/7/10 15:31, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>> I'm seeing some files now. Thank you!
>>
>> I assume the enterprise ct is not available yet?
>
> No, I don't think so. I think the vote just started on that and it has
> to go through more process after that, IIUC.
>
> -> richard
>
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Richard S.
>> Hall<he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>>> On 5/7/10 14:55, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>>>> I can access https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/osgi-cts but I don't see
>>>> any files in there. Is there something else that's needs to be done in
>>>> order to get hold of osgi ct or maybe the ct isn't checked in yet?
>>>>
>>> Sorry, I'm swamped, so I haven't checked it in yet...I will try to
>>> get to it
>>> shortly...feel free to bug me again if you get impatient. :-)
>>>
>>> -> richard
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jarek
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Thomas<ma...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/05/2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other
>>>>>>> kinds of
>>>>>>> things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific
>>>>>>> language in
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
>>>>>>
>>>>> All done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard you have read-write access, as do Gier, Daniel and myself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone who has signed the NDA has read access.
>>>>>
>>>>> Enjoy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 5/7/10 15:31, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I'm seeing some files now. Thank you!
>
> I assume the enterprise ct is not available yet?
>
No, I don't think so. I think the vote just started on that and it has
to go through more process after that, IIUC.
-> richard
> Jarek
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>
>> On 5/7/10 14:55, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>>
>>> I can access https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/osgi-cts but I don't see
>>> any files in there. Is there something else that's needs to be done in
>>> order to get hold of osgi ct or maybe the ct isn't checked in yet?
>>>
>>>
>> Sorry, I'm swamped, so I haven't checked it in yet...I will try to get to it
>> shortly...feel free to bug me again if you get impatient. :-)
>>
>> -> richard
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jarek
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Thomas<ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 04/05/2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other kinds of
>>>>>> things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific language in
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> All done.
>>>>
>>>> Richard you have read-write access, as do Gier, Daniel and myself.
>>>>
>>>> Everyone who has signed the NDA has read access.
>>>>
>>>> Enjoy.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
I'm seeing some files now. Thank you!
I assume the enterprise ct is not available yet?
Jarek
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
> On 5/7/10 14:55, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>>
>> I can access https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/osgi-cts but I don't see
>> any files in there. Is there something else that's needs to be done in
>> order to get hold of osgi ct or maybe the ct isn't checked in yet?
>>
>
> Sorry, I'm swamped, so I haven't checked it in yet...I will try to get to it
> shortly...feel free to bug me again if you get impatient. :-)
>
> -> richard
>
>> Thanks,
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Thomas<ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 04/05/2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other kinds of
>>>>> things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific language in
>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
>>>>
>>>
>>> All done.
>>>
>>> Richard you have read-write access, as do Gier, Daniel and myself.
>>>
>>> Everyone who has signed the NDA has read access.
>>>
>>> Enjoy.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 5/7/10 14:55, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I can access https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/osgi-cts but I don't see
> any files in there. Is there something else that's needs to be done in
> order to get hold of osgi ct or maybe the ct isn't checked in yet?
>
Sorry, I'm swamped, so I haven't checked it in yet...I will try to get
to it shortly...feel free to bug me again if you get impatient. :-)
-> richard
> Thanks,
> Jarek
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Thomas<ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 04/05/2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other kinds of things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific language in it.
>>>>
>>> OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
>>>
>> All done.
>>
>> Richard you have read-write access, as do Gier, Daniel and myself.
>>
>> Everyone who has signed the NDA has read access.
>>
>> Enjoy.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <ad...@toolazydogs.com>.
This must be Richard in action because what was once an empty
directory this morning is now full directories with jars.
Regards,
Alan
On May 7, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Jarek,
>
> I can verify that there are directories in the directory (e.g. /osgi-
> cts/osgi.core.tests/4.2/osgi.core.tests.jar). Perhaps your
> permissions are stopping you?
>
> Craig
>
> On May 7, 2010, at 11:55 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>
>> I can access https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/osgi-cts but I don't
>> see
>> any files in there. Is there something else that's needs to be done
>> in
>> order to get hold of osgi ct or maybe the ct isn't checked in yet?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>> On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>>> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other
>>>>> kinds of things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-
>>>>> specific language in it.
>>>>
>>>> OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
>>>
>>> All done.
>>>
>>> Richard you have read-write access, as do Gier, Daniel and myself.
>>>
>>> Everyone who has signed the NDA has read access.
>>>
>>> Enjoy.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Oracle
> http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 5/7/10 15:20, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Jarek,
>
> I can verify that there are directories in the directory (e.g.
> /osgi-cts/osgi.core.tests/4.2/osgi.core.tests.jar). Perhaps your
> permissions are stopping you?
No, I just committed them.
-> richard
>
> Craig
>
> On May 7, 2010, at 11:55 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>
>> I can access https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/osgi-cts but I don't see
>> any files in there. Is there something else that's needs to be done in
>> order to get hold of osgi ct or maybe the ct isn't checked in yet?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>> On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>>> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other kinds
>>>>> of things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific
>>>>> language in it.
>>>>
>>>> OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
>>>
>>> All done.
>>>
>>> Richard you have read-write access, as do Gier, Daniel and myself.
>>>
>>> Everyone who has signed the NDA has read access.
>>>
>>> Enjoy.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Oracle
> http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by Craig L Russell <cr...@oracle.com>.
Hi Jarek,
I can verify that there are directories in the directory (e.g. /osgi-
cts/osgi.core.tests/4.2/osgi.core.tests.jar). Perhaps your permissions
are stopping you?
Craig
On May 7, 2010, at 11:55 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I can access https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/osgi-cts but I don't see
> any files in there. Is there something else that's needs to be done in
> order to get hold of osgi ct or maybe the ct isn't checked in yet?
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 04/05/2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other kinds
>>>> of things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific
>>>> language in it.
>>>
>>> OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
>>
>> All done.
>>
>> Richard you have read-write access, as do Gier, Daniel and myself.
>>
>> Everyone who has signed the NDA has read access.
>>
>> Enjoy.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
I can access https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/osgi-cts but I don't see
any files in there. Is there something else that's needs to be done in
order to get hold of osgi ct or maybe the ct isn't checked in yet?
Thanks,
Jarek
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 04/05/2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other kinds of things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific language in it.
>>
>> OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
>
> All done.
>
> Richard you have read-write access, as do Gier, Daniel and myself.
>
> Everyone who has signed the NDA has read access.
>
> Enjoy.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 04/05/2010 11:17, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> "geir" :)
Sorry.
M
>
> On May 4, 2010, at 6:04 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 04/05/2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other kinds of things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific language in it.
>>>
>>> OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
>>
>> All done.
>>
>> Richard you have read-write access, as do Gier, Daniel and myself.
>>
>> Everyone who has signed the NDA has read access.
>>
>> Enjoy.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
"geir" :)
On May 4, 2010, at 6:04 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/05/2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other kinds of things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific language in it.
>>
>> OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
>
> All done.
>
> Richard you have read-write access, as do Gier, Daniel and myself.
>
> Everyone who has signed the NDA has read access.
>
> Enjoy.
>
> Mark
>
>
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 5/4/10 6:04, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/05/2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other kinds of things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific language in it.
>>>
>> OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
>>
> All done.
>
> Richard you have read-write access, as do Gier, Daniel and myself.
>
> Everyone who has signed the NDA has read access.
>
> Enjoy.
>
Excellent, thanks!
-> richard
> Mark
>
>
>
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 04/05/2010 10:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other kinds of things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific language in it.
>
> OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
All done.
Richard you have read-write access, as do Gier, Daniel and myself.
Everyone who has signed the NDA has read access.
Enjoy.
Mark
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 04/05/2010 10:40, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other kinds of things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific language in it.
OK. That makes things easier. I'll get that set-up.
Mark
>
> geir
>
> On May 4, 2010, at 5:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 02/05/2010 18:49, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>> On 5/2/10 8:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>> There is no https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/osgi-tcks/ repo at the
>>>> moment. I can create one if you wish (you need full svn admin to do this
>>>> as it is at the root of the repo).
>>>>
>>>> The way /sun-tcks/ is organised, Daniel, Geir and I have read-write
>>>> access and anyone who has signed the sun NDA has read-only access.
>>>>
>>>> We can set-up /osgi-tcks/ however you wish. I assume it would be
>>>> read-write for you and read-only for TBD.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if you want to go this route and if so, how you want the
>>>> repo set up and I'll get that done.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The OSGi Alliance doesn't call it a TCK, they call it a CT (compliance
>>> or conformance tests, I don't remember which), so if we want to use
>>> their terminology, we should use /osgi-cts/...but I guess it really
>>> doesn't matter to me.
>>>
>>> Sure, set me up with write access so I can maintain it and anyone else
>>> who wants to be able to do so. As far as read access, I think anyone
>>> signing an NDA can be granted read access regardless...I assume it is
>>> not necessary for us to distinguish why people submitted an NDA, so if
>>> you submit one you can have read access to all of it...
>>
>> I assume this is a different NDA to the one folks sign to gain access to
>> the Sun TCKs. Where can I find a list of the folks that have signed the
>> relevant NDA?
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>
Re: OSGi CTs - Was: New process for obtaining TCKs
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
it is the same. THe NDA was originally designed with other kinds of things in mind other than just TCKs. There is no JCP-specific language in it.
geir
On May 4, 2010, at 5:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 02/05/2010 18:49, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> On 5/2/10 8:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> There is no https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/osgi-tcks/ repo at the
>>> moment. I can create one if you wish (you need full svn admin to do this
>>> as it is at the root of the repo).
>>>
>>> The way /sun-tcks/ is organised, Daniel, Geir and I have read-write
>>> access and anyone who has signed the sun NDA has read-only access.
>>>
>>> We can set-up /osgi-tcks/ however you wish. I assume it would be
>>> read-write for you and read-only for TBD.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you want to go this route and if so, how you want the
>>> repo set up and I'll get that done.
>>>
>>
>> The OSGi Alliance doesn't call it a TCK, they call it a CT (compliance
>> or conformance tests, I don't remember which), so if we want to use
>> their terminology, we should use /osgi-cts/...but I guess it really
>> doesn't matter to me.
>>
>> Sure, set me up with write access so I can maintain it and anyone else
>> who wants to be able to do so. As far as read access, I think anyone
>> signing an NDA can be granted read access regardless...I assume it is
>> not necessary for us to distinguish why people submitted an NDA, so if
>> you submit one you can have read access to all of it...
>
> I assume this is a different NDA to the one folks sign to gain access to
> the Sun TCKs. Where can I find a list of the folks that have signed the
> relevant NDA?
>
> Mark
>
>