You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@jakarta.apache.org by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> on 2005/07/26 22:52:17 UTC
Re: svn commit: r225366 - in /jakarta/site: docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml
On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin <rd...@apache.org> wrote:
> hi Jean-Frederic
>
> docs/site/downloads/download_tomcat.html is generated and so these
> changes are in grave danger of being reverted next time someone
> regenerates the site.
<snip/>
I also see a pending mod for Stefan's update of whoweare.html. I just
regenerated the site, but I avoided reverting those two. I could
easily have committed those; I just didn't know what the "etiquette"
is.
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r225366 - in /jakarta/site: docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 7/28/05, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I also see a pending mod for Stefan's update of whoweare.html.
>
> My fault. I was on a machine with no Java 5 on it and knew that if I
> regenerated the site a whole lot changes would get commited that I
> didn't want. I should have added a comment inside my commit message
> about that.
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
That probably came out wrong. I was looking to help, I definitely
wasn't complaining ;-) It was no trouble at all.
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r225366 - in /jakarta/site:
docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html
xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also see a pending mod for Stefan's update of whoweare.html.
My fault. I was on a machine with no Java 5 on it and knew that if I
regenerated the site a whole lot changes would get commited that I
didn't want. I should have added a comment inside my commit message
about that.
Sorry for the confusion.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r225366 - in /jakarta/site: docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
> On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:52 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin <rd...@apache.org> wrote:
<snip/>
> > I just regenerated the site, but I avoided reverting those two. I could
> > easily have committed those; I just didn't know what the "etiquette"
> > is.
>
> for me, it's a judgement call depending on the person and the change.
> hopefully, other people will jump in here with more general opinions...
OK, so if we don't have a clear standing etiquette, here is my opinion:
If someone updated xdocs/; he/she most probably also intended to
update docs/ *and* intended to do the svn update. I see this as
atomic.
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: svn commit: r225366 - in /jakarta/site:docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.htmlxdocs/downloads/downloads.xml
Posted by Yoav Shapira <yo...@yahoo.com>.
Hi,
> i posted something to stefan off list (wanted to email him anyway).
>
> > I just regenerated the site, but I avoided reverting those two. I could
> > easily have committed those; I just didn't know what the "etiquette"
> > is.
>
> for me, it's a judgement call depending on the person and the change.
> hopefully, other people will jump in here with more general opinions...
Notify the person, without overwriting their work, and ask them to make
their changes in the xdocs, regenerate the site, and update it properly. So
you both did the right thing IMHO.
Yoav
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r225366 - in /jakarta/site:
docs/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.html
xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml
Posted by robert burrell donkin <rd...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:52 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin <rd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > hi Jean-Frederic
> >
> > docs/site/downloads/download_tomcat.html is generated and so these
> > changes are in grave danger of being reverted next time someone
> > regenerates the site.
> <snip/>
>
> I also see a pending mod for Stefan's update of whoweare.html.
i posted something to stefan off list (wanted to email him anyway).
> I just regenerated the site, but I avoided reverting those two. I could
> easily have committed those; I just didn't know what the "etiquette"
> is.
for me, it's a judgement call depending on the person and the change.
hopefully, other people will jump in here with more general opinions...
- robert