[jira] Commented: (CXF-1844) Add support for byte and Byte

["Willem Jiang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12637915#action_12637915 ] 

Willem Jiang commented on CXF-1844:
-----------------------------------

Hi Benson, 

 It took me some time to merge the change into 2.0.x .Could you review the BeanTest  to make sure I didn't mess up anything?
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/branches/2.0.x-fixes/rt/databinding/aegis/src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/aegis/type/basic/BeanTest.java?view=markup&pathrev=702794

Cheers,

Willem

> Add support for byte and Byte
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-1844
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1844
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Aegis Databinding
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.8, 2.1.2
>            Reporter: Brett Graves
>            Assignee: Willem Jiang
>             Fix For: 2.2
>
>
> Hi, 
> I have a web service which accepts a byte parameter in one of the objects and aegis does not support it out of the box.  I ran across this issue submitted to XFire some time ago, but it seems it was never fixed:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XFIRE-462
> That bug focuses mainly on the wsdl creation, but the byte values don't even get passed correctly to the service.  It seems like a pretty simple fix,so I'm not really sure why it was never resolved.  For the time being I added some custom types (basically just like the ShortType) to handle the two byte classes, but things would be a lot cleaner if aegis supported them.
> Preferably, this would be resolved in the 2.0.x branch as we have not yet moved to 2.1.x.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.