You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@santuario.apache.org by Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org> on 2015/07/08 13:15:58 UTC
2.0.5 and 1.5.9 releases
I was thinking of calling a vote tomorrow for 2.0.5 and 1.5.9 unless there
is anything else anyone would like to get in? The fixes for 1.5.9 are
fairly minor, but I'd like to just release it and have it be the last
release of 1.5.x.
Colm.
--
Colm O hEigeartaigh
Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com
Re: 2.0.5 and 1.5.9 releases
Posted by "Cantor, Scott" <ca...@osu.edu>.
On 7/8/15, 11:53 AM, "Colm O hEigeartaigh" <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>I did mean EOL'ing 1.5. I'm a bit sick of having to keep JDK 1.5 around to compile old projects ;-)
Trust me, I get it. ;-)
>However, I'm prepared to be flexible on this, so given the OpenSAML 2 dependency I will leave the 1.5.9 release until next year, unless a security issue or major bug crops up in the meantime. Is this acceptable for you?
Our perfect world is that they happen to line up so we don't have to do work, but we're prepared to do what we have to regardless, just need a clear timeline. So if you have a date in mind prior to 7/31/16 to set the EOL, that's cool with us.
Given this much notice, I'm sure we can accomodate any date in 2016. Brent's on vacation but he'll see this when he's back.
-- Scott
Re: 2.0.5 and 1.5.9 releases
Posted by Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Cantor, Scott <ca...@osu.edu> wrote:
>
> For clarification, do you mean really EOL'ing 1.5 (meaning even a security
> issue wouldn't be addressed), or something less final?
>
I did mean EOL'ing 1.5. I'm a bit sick of having to keep JDK 1.5 around to
compile old projects ;-)
However, I'm prepared to be flexible on this, so given the OpenSAML 2
dependency I will leave the 1.5.9 release until next year, unless a
security issue or major bug crops up in the meantime. Is this acceptable
for you?
Colm.
> If there was advance notice that this was coming, that's my fault for
> missing it. We're supporting the OpenSAML 2 code base until next July, and
> it depends on 1.x right now. We just need to know if we need to budget for
> moving it to 2.x.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
--
Colm O hEigeartaigh
Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com
Re: 2.0.5 and 1.5.9 releases
Posted by "Cantor, Scott" <ca...@osu.edu>.
On 7/8/15, 7:15 AM, "Colm O hEigeartaigh" <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>I was thinking of calling a vote tomorrow for 2.0.5 and 1.5.9 unless there is anything else anyone would like to get in? The fixes for 1.5.9 are fairly minor, but I'd like to just release it and have it be the last release of 1.5.x.
For clarification, do you mean really EOL'ing 1.5 (meaning even a security issue wouldn't be addressed), or something less final?
If there was advance notice that this was coming, that's my fault for missing it. We're supporting the OpenSAML 2 code base until next July, and it depends on 1.x right now. We just need to know if we need to budget for moving it to 2.x.
-- Scott