You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Jarek Gawor (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/03/23 15:24:32 UTC
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3006) WebServiceRef injection ignored
.value attribute
WebServiceRef injection ignored .value attribute
------------------------------------------------
Key: GERONIMO-3006
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3006
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: webservices
Reporter: Jarek Gawor
WebServiceRef annotation can be defined as the following:
@WebServiceRef(name="accounting",
value=AccountingService.class)
AccountingPortType foo;
or
@WebServiceRef(name="accounting"
AccountingService.class)
AccountingPortType foo;
Currently, the above annotations will result in the following error message:
AccountingPortType does not extend javax.xml.rpc.Service or javax.xml.ws.Service
at org.apache.geronimo.naming.deployment.SwitchingServiceRefBuilder.buildNaming(SwitchingServiceRefBuilder.java:130)
Which looks like the WebServiceRef.value is ignored and the service-ref is created incorrectly (service-interface should be set to AccountingService class and service-ref-type should be set to AccountingPortType class)
Section 4.2.2 in JSR 109 to see how exactly the WebServiceRef annotation attributes are translated into the DD. Also, section 7.9 in JAXWS 2.0 might be helpful.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3006) WebServiceRef injection ignored
.value attribute
Posted by "Tim McConnell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMO-3006:
------------------------------------
Attachment: GERONIMO-3006.patch
Added code to definitively distinquish between the two usages of @WebServiceRef annotation such that the proper DD tags are generated:
1) To declare a generated service class, and
2) To specify an SEI
> WebServiceRef injection ignored .value attribute
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3006
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3006
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: webservices
> Reporter: Jarek Gawor
> Assigned To: Tim McConnell
> Attachments: GERONIMO-3006.patch
>
>
> WebServiceRef annotation can be defined as the following:
> @WebServiceRef(name="accounting",
> value=AccountingService.class)
> AccountingPortType foo;
> or
> @WebServiceRef(name="accounting"
> AccountingService.class)
> AccountingPortType foo;
> Currently, the above annotations will result in the following error message:
> AccountingPortType does not extend javax.xml.rpc.Service or javax.xml.ws.Service
> at org.apache.geronimo.naming.deployment.SwitchingServiceRefBuilder.buildNaming(SwitchingServiceRefBuilder.java:130)
> Which looks like the WebServiceRef.value is ignored and the service-ref is created incorrectly (service-interface should be set to AccountingService class and service-ref-type should be set to AccountingPortType class)
> Section 4.2.2 in JSR 109 to see how exactly the WebServiceRef annotation attributes are translated into the DD. Also, section 7.9 in JAXWS 2.0 might be helpful.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3006) WebServiceRef injection ignored
.value attribute
Posted by "Jarek Gawor (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3006.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Patch committed (Committed revision 522146).
> WebServiceRef injection ignored .value attribute
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3006
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3006
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: webservices
> Reporter: Jarek Gawor
> Assigned To: Tim McConnell
> Attachments: GERONIMO-3006.patch
>
>
> WebServiceRef annotation can be defined as the following:
> @WebServiceRef(name="accounting",
> value=AccountingService.class)
> AccountingPortType foo;
> or
> @WebServiceRef(name="accounting"
> AccountingService.class)
> AccountingPortType foo;
> Currently, the above annotations will result in the following error message:
> AccountingPortType does not extend javax.xml.rpc.Service or javax.xml.ws.Service
> at org.apache.geronimo.naming.deployment.SwitchingServiceRefBuilder.buildNaming(SwitchingServiceRefBuilder.java:130)
> Which looks like the WebServiceRef.value is ignored and the service-ref is created incorrectly (service-interface should be set to AccountingService class and service-ref-type should be set to AccountingPortType class)
> Section 4.2.2 in JSR 109 to see how exactly the WebServiceRef annotation attributes are translated into the DD. Also, section 7.9 in JAXWS 2.0 might be helpful.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3006) WebServiceRef injection ignored
.value attribute
Posted by "Tim McConnell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Tim McConnell reassigned GERONIMO-3006:
---------------------------------------
Assignee: Tim McConnell
> WebServiceRef injection ignored .value attribute
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3006
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3006
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: webservices
> Reporter: Jarek Gawor
> Assigned To: Tim McConnell
>
> WebServiceRef annotation can be defined as the following:
> @WebServiceRef(name="accounting",
> value=AccountingService.class)
> AccountingPortType foo;
> or
> @WebServiceRef(name="accounting"
> AccountingService.class)
> AccountingPortType foo;
> Currently, the above annotations will result in the following error message:
> AccountingPortType does not extend javax.xml.rpc.Service or javax.xml.ws.Service
> at org.apache.geronimo.naming.deployment.SwitchingServiceRefBuilder.buildNaming(SwitchingServiceRefBuilder.java:130)
> Which looks like the WebServiceRef.value is ignored and the service-ref is created incorrectly (service-interface should be set to AccountingService class and service-ref-type should be set to AccountingPortType class)
> Section 4.2.2 in JSR 109 to see how exactly the WebServiceRef annotation attributes are translated into the DD. Also, section 7.9 in JAXWS 2.0 might be helpful.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.