You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@drill.apache.org by "Mehant Baid (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/05/06 01:00:16 UTC

[jira] [Created] (DRILL-641) Better semantic and handling for kill()

Mehant Baid created DRILL-641:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Better semantic and handling for kill()
                 Key: DRILL-641
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-641
             Project: Apache Drill
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Mehant Baid


Currently when an operator invokes kill(), only the upstream operators within that fragment get terminated. This causes problems if the upstream operator in a different fragment is still continuously producing batches, and it then becomes the responsibility of the operator to drain all the batches even though a kill was issued.

While dealing with plans with multiple fragments we would need to inform the sender that a kill has been invoked. It would then be the responsibility of the sender to not push any more batches to the corresponding receiver. 




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)