You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@drill.apache.org by "Mehant Baid (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/05/06 01:00:16 UTC
[jira] [Created] (DRILL-641) Better semantic and handling for
kill()
Mehant Baid created DRILL-641:
---------------------------------
Summary: Better semantic and handling for kill()
Key: DRILL-641
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-641
Project: Apache Drill
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Mehant Baid
Currently when an operator invokes kill(), only the upstream operators within that fragment get terminated. This causes problems if the upstream operator in a different fragment is still continuously producing batches, and it then becomes the responsibility of the operator to drain all the batches even though a kill was issued.
While dealing with plans with multiple fragments we would need to inform the sender that a kill has been invoked. It would then be the responsibility of the sender to not push any more batches to the corresponding receiver.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)