You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-user@hadoop.apache.org by xeonmailinglist-gmail <xe...@gmail.com> on 2015/04/17 20:27:31 UTC

several jobs in one MapReduce runtime

Hi,

I have a MapReduce runtime where I put several jobs running in 
concurrency. How I manage the job scheduler so that it won't run a job 
at a time?

Thanks,

-- 
--


Re: several jobs in one MapReduce runtime

Posted by 杨浩 <ya...@gmail.com>.
If the cluster have enough resource, then more than one job will run at the
same time

2015-04-18 2:27 GMT+08:00 xeonmailinglist-gmail <xe...@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I have a MapReduce runtime where I put several jobs running in
> concurrency. How I manage the job scheduler so that it won't run a job at a
> time?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> --
>
>

Re: several jobs in one MapReduce runtime

Posted by 杨浩 <ya...@gmail.com>.
If the cluster have enough resource, then more than one job will run at the
same time

2015-04-18 2:27 GMT+08:00 xeonmailinglist-gmail <xe...@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I have a MapReduce runtime where I put several jobs running in
> concurrency. How I manage the job scheduler so that it won't run a job at a
> time?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> --
>
>

Re: several jobs in one MapReduce runtime

Posted by 杨浩 <ya...@gmail.com>.
If the cluster have enough resource, then more than one job will run at the
same time

2015-04-18 2:27 GMT+08:00 xeonmailinglist-gmail <xe...@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I have a MapReduce runtime where I put several jobs running in
> concurrency. How I manage the job scheduler so that it won't run a job at a
> time?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> --
>
>

Re: several jobs in one MapReduce runtime

Posted by 杨浩 <ya...@gmail.com>.
If the cluster have enough resource, then more than one job will run at the
same time

2015-04-18 2:27 GMT+08:00 xeonmailinglist-gmail <xe...@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I have a MapReduce runtime where I put several jobs running in
> concurrency. How I manage the job scheduler so that it won't run a job at a
> time?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> --
>
>