You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@perl.apache.org by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org> on 2002/05/19 10:01:02 UTC
dropping ModPerl::RegistryNG
Is it ok if I drop ModPerl::RegistryNG? Currently it just an alias to
ModPerl::Registry. there is no need for it, because the whole family is
NG now. Also it's not called Apache::RegistryNG in any case.
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: dropping ModPerl::RegistryNG
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>Is it ok if I drop ModPerl::RegistryNG? Currently it just an alias to
>>ModPerl::Registry. there is no need for it, because the whole family is
>>NG now. Also it's not called Apache::RegistryNG in any case.
>
>
> sounds right to me. the original idea behind RegistryNG is that it would
> replace Registry, so yes, 2.0 version is the 'NG' without having to say
> 'NG'.
ok, done
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
Re: dropping ModPerl::RegistryNG
Posted by Doug MacEachern <do...@covalent.net>.
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Is it ok if I drop ModPerl::RegistryNG? Currently it just an alias to
> ModPerl::Registry. there is no need for it, because the whole family is
> NG now. Also it's not called Apache::RegistryNG in any case.
sounds right to me. the original idea behind RegistryNG is that it would
replace Registry, so yes, 2.0 version is the 'NG' without having to say
'NG'.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org