You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@orc.apache.org by "cedric (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/03/06 08:39:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (ORC-474) ColumnVectorBatch would benefit from a
clean() method to reset all numElements recusively
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORC-474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
cedric updated ORC-474:
-----------------------
Description:
When dealing with deeply nested structure it can be quite tedious to reset all numElements recursively after a batch has been written. In practice, the simplest is probably for the client to create his own classes inheriting all of ColumnVectorBatches classes and adding such a clear() method to reset all numElements recursively.
Shouldn't liborc just provide that?
was:
When dealing with deeply nested structure it can be quite tedious to reset all numElements recursively after a batch has been written. In practice, the simplest is probably for the client to create his own classes inheriting all of ColumnVectorBatches classes and adding such a clean() method to reset all numElements recursively.
Shouldn't liborc just provide that?
> ColumnVectorBatch would benefit from a clean() method to reset all numElements recusively
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ORC-474
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORC-474
> Project: ORC
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: C++
> Reporter: cedric
> Priority: Minor
>
> When dealing with deeply nested structure it can be quite tedious to reset all numElements recursively after a batch has been written. In practice, the simplest is probably for the client to create his own classes inheriting all of ColumnVectorBatches classes and adding such a clear() method to reset all numElements recursively.
> Shouldn't liborc just provide that?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)