You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> on 2006/11/01 10:47:53 UTC
[general] Motorola to develop ME under ALv2
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/061031/cgtu074.html?.v=46
Now *that's* cool :-)
For those of you that are not ME-enabled, Motorola is a major player in
the ME space. They are deeply involved in advancing the spec and have a
track record of developing and collaborating 'in the open'.
By declaring their intent to use ALv2 and Apache-style governance we can
all look forward to an open and unrestricted exchange with the good folk
at Motorola.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
Re: [general] Motorola to develop ME under ALv2
Posted by Alexey Varlamov <al...@gmail.com>.
01 Nov 2006 16:08:28 +0600, Egor Pasko <eg...@gmail.com>:
> On the 0x214 day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
> > AFAIK ME shares a lot of core classes and packages with SE. And we have
> > these packages implemented.
> > And now I'm really interesting if Motorola wants to reuse our code or
> > develop "the better one" ?
>
At least there'll be no stumbling blocks from legal POV, code can flow
freely. Really cool!
> we like to say "more free software is not a problem" :)
>
> > On 11/1/06, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/061031/cgtu074.html?.v=46
> > >
> > > Now *that's* cool :-)
> > >
> > > For those of you that are not ME-enabled, Motorola is a major player in
> > > the ME space. They are deeply involved in advancing the spec and have a
> > > track record of developing and collaborating 'in the open'.
> > >
> > > By declaring their intent to use ALv2 and Apache-style governance we can
> > > all look forward to an open and unrestricted exchange with the good folk
> > > at Motorola.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tim
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mikhail Fursov
>
> --
> Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division
>
>
Re: [general] Motorola to develop ME under ALv2
Posted by Dalibor Topic <ro...@kaffe.org>.
Egor Pasko <egor.pasko <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> On the 0x214 day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
> > AFAIK ME shares a lot of core classes and packages with SE. And we have
> > these packages implemented.
> > And now I'm really interesting if Motorola wants to reuse our code or
> > develop "the better one" ?
>
> we like to say "more free software is not a problem" :)
+1 :)
The more, the merrier.
cheers,
dalibor topic
Re: [general] Motorola to develop ME under ALv2
Posted by Egor Pasko <eg...@gmail.com>.
On the 0x214 day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
> AFAIK ME shares a lot of core classes and packages with SE. And we have
> these packages implemented.
> And now I'm really interesting if Motorola wants to reuse our code or
> develop "the better one" ?
we like to say "more free software is not a problem" :)
> On 11/1/06, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/061031/cgtu074.html?.v=46
> >
> > Now *that's* cool :-)
> >
> > For those of you that are not ME-enabled, Motorola is a major player in
> > the ME space. They are deeply involved in advancing the spec and have a
> > track record of developing and collaborating 'in the open'.
> >
> > By declaring their intent to use ALv2 and Apache-style governance we can
> > all look forward to an open and unrestricted exchange with the good folk
> > at Motorola.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim
> >
> > --
> >
> > Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Mikhail Fursov
--
Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division
Re: [general] Motorola to develop ME under ALv2
Posted by Weldon Washburn <we...@gmail.com>.
Fantastic! It will be very tempting to read the "[JME][J2SE] blah, blah..."
emails on harmony-dev. But this is actually a good problem to have :)
On 11/1/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> > This is about Motorola and their efforts in the ME ecosystem. The
> > Apache style of open governance has shown itself to be very successful
> > in creating good software, although there are other models that are
> > successful as well (Eclipse Foundation, MySQL). So seeing Motorola
> > embrace that, as well as our license - which gets rid of any license
> > interop for whatever they do - is just a great step forward for the
> > industry as a whole.
> >
> > Back to SE... :)
>
> I re-read this, and I didn't come across right here. It sounds like
> I'm trying to change the subject - I'm not. This is a great thing - as
> we all think that the Apache Way (whatever that is) is the bees knees so
> more of it is better.
>
> I don't mean "stop talking" - we can talk about whatever we want. What
> I meant was "I'm going back to all the stuff I want to do on SE... " :)
>
> geir
>
>
> >
> > geir
> >
> >
> > Tim Ellison wrote:
> >> Mikhail Fursov wrote:
> >>> AFAIK ME shares a lot of core classes and packages with SE. And we
> >>> have these packages implemented. And now I'm really interesting if
> >>> Motorola wants to reuse our code or develop "the better one" ?
> >>
> >> You can see the same statement as me, so it would only be speculation
> to
> >> talk about 'what Motorola want' beyond what they have said already.
> >>
> >> The cool part is that by choosing ALv2 Harmony can freely engage and
> >> exchange with their effort.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Tim
> >>
> >
>
--
Weldon Washburn
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
Re: [general] Motorola to develop ME under ALv2
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> This is about Motorola and their efforts in the ME ecosystem. The
> Apache style of open governance has shown itself to be very successful
> in creating good software, although there are other models that are
> successful as well (Eclipse Foundation, MySQL). So seeing Motorola
> embrace that, as well as our license - which gets rid of any license
> interop for whatever they do - is just a great step forward for the
> industry as a whole.
>
> Back to SE... :)
I re-read this, and I didn't come across right here. It sounds like
I'm trying to change the subject - I'm not. This is a great thing - as
we all think that the Apache Way (whatever that is) is the bees knees so
more of it is better.
I don't mean "stop talking" - we can talk about whatever we want. What
I meant was "I'm going back to all the stuff I want to do on SE... " :)
geir
>
> geir
>
>
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Mikhail Fursov wrote:
>>> AFAIK ME shares a lot of core classes and packages with SE. And we
>>> have these packages implemented. And now I'm really interesting if
>>> Motorola wants to reuse our code or develop "the better one" ?
>>
>> You can see the same statement as me, so it would only be speculation to
>> talk about 'what Motorola want' beyond what they have said already.
>>
>> The cool part is that by choosing ALv2 Harmony can freely engage and
>> exchange with their effort.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>
Re: [general] Motorola to develop ME under ALv2
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
This is about Motorola and their efforts in the ME ecosystem. The
Apache style of open governance has shown itself to be very successful
in creating good software, although there are other models that are
successful as well (Eclipse Foundation, MySQL). So seeing Motorola
embrace that, as well as our license - which gets rid of any license
interop for whatever they do - is just a great step forward for the
industry as a whole.
Back to SE... :)
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Mikhail Fursov wrote:
>> AFAIK ME shares a lot of core classes and packages with SE. And we
>> have these packages implemented. And now I'm really interesting if
>> Motorola wants to reuse our code or develop "the better one" ?
>
> You can see the same statement as me, so it would only be speculation to
> talk about 'what Motorola want' beyond what they have said already.
>
> The cool part is that by choosing ALv2 Harmony can freely engage and
> exchange with their effort.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
Re: [general] Motorola to develop ME under ALv2
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
> AFAIK ME shares a lot of core classes and packages with SE. And we
> have these packages implemented. And now I'm really interesting if
> Motorola wants to reuse our code or develop "the better one" ?
You can see the same statement as me, so it would only be speculation to
talk about 'what Motorola want' beyond what they have said already.
The cool part is that by choosing ALv2 Harmony can freely engage and
exchange with their effort.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
Re: [general] Motorola to develop ME under ALv2
Posted by Mikhail Fursov <mi...@gmail.com>.
AFAIK ME shares a lot of core classes and packages with SE. And we have
these packages implemented.
And now I'm really interesting if Motorola wants to reuse our code or
develop "the better one" ?
On 11/1/06, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/061031/cgtu074.html?.v=46
>
> Now *that's* cool :-)
>
> For those of you that are not ME-enabled, Motorola is a major player in
> the ME space. They are deeply involved in advancing the spec and have a
> track record of developing and collaborating 'in the open'.
>
> By declaring their intent to use ALv2 and Apache-style governance we can
> all look forward to an open and unrestricted exchange with the good folk
> at Motorola.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> --
>
> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
>
>
--
Mikhail Fursov