You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by "Igor Drobiazko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/02/12 10:20:31 UTC
[jira] Created: (TAP5-1014) Message about missing or wrong
retention policy of a marker annotation is misleading
Message about missing or wrong retention policy of a marker annotation is misleading
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: TAP5-1014
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1014
Project: Tapestry 5
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: tapestry-ioc
Affects Versions: 5.1.0.5
Reporter: Igor Drobiazko
Priority: Minor
Using another renetion policy policy than RUNTIME for a marker annotation leads to the following exception
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Marker annotation class org.example.Blue is not valid because it is not visible at runtime. Add a @RetentionPolicy(RUNTIME) to the class.
at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.InternalUtils.validateMarkerAnnotation(InternalUtils.java:698)
at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.InternalUtils.validateMarkerAnnotations(InternalUtils.java:703)
at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.ServiceBinderImpl.withMarker(ServiceBinderImpl.java:292)
A proper mesage is:
Add a @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) to the class.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (TAP5-1014) Message about missing or wrong retention
policy of a marker annotation is misleading
Posted by "Igor Drobiazko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Igor Drobiazko closed TAP5-1014.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.2.0
> Message about missing or wrong retention policy of a marker annotation is misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-1014
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1014
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: tapestry-ioc
> Affects Versions: 5.1.0.5
> Reporter: Igor Drobiazko
> Assignee: Igor Drobiazko
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2.0
>
>
> Using another renetion policy policy than RUNTIME for a marker annotation leads to the following exception
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Marker annotation class org.example.Blue is not valid because it is not visible at runtime. Add a @RetentionPolicy(RUNTIME) to the class.
> at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.InternalUtils.validateMarkerAnnotation(InternalUtils.java:698)
> at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.InternalUtils.validateMarkerAnnotations(InternalUtils.java:703)
> at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.ServiceBinderImpl.withMarker(ServiceBinderImpl.java:292)
> A proper mesage is:
> Add a @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) to the class.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (TAP5-1014) Message about missing or wrong retention
policy of a marker annotation is misleading
Posted by "Igor Drobiazko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Igor Drobiazko closed TAP5-1014.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.2.0
> Message about missing or wrong retention policy of a marker annotation is misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-1014
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1014
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: tapestry-ioc
> Affects Versions: 5.1.0.5
> Reporter: Igor Drobiazko
> Assignee: Igor Drobiazko
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2.0
>
>
> Using another renetion policy policy than RUNTIME for a marker annotation leads to the following exception
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Marker annotation class org.example.Blue is not valid because it is not visible at runtime. Add a @RetentionPolicy(RUNTIME) to the class.
> at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.InternalUtils.validateMarkerAnnotation(InternalUtils.java:698)
> at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.InternalUtils.validateMarkerAnnotations(InternalUtils.java:703)
> at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.ServiceBinderImpl.withMarker(ServiceBinderImpl.java:292)
> A proper mesage is:
> Add a @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) to the class.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (TAP5-1014) Message about missing or wrong
retention policy of a marker annotation is misleading
Posted by "Igor Drobiazko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Igor Drobiazko reassigned TAP5-1014:
------------------------------------
Assignee: Igor Drobiazko
> Message about missing or wrong retention policy of a marker annotation is misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-1014
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1014
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: tapestry-ioc
> Affects Versions: 5.1.0.5
> Reporter: Igor Drobiazko
> Assignee: Igor Drobiazko
> Priority: Minor
>
> Using another renetion policy policy than RUNTIME for a marker annotation leads to the following exception
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Marker annotation class org.example.Blue is not valid because it is not visible at runtime. Add a @RetentionPolicy(RUNTIME) to the class.
> at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.InternalUtils.validateMarkerAnnotation(InternalUtils.java:698)
> at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.InternalUtils.validateMarkerAnnotations(InternalUtils.java:703)
> at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.ServiceBinderImpl.withMarker(ServiceBinderImpl.java:292)
> A proper mesage is:
> Add a @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) to the class.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (TAP5-1014) Message about missing or wrong
retention policy of a marker annotation is misleading
Posted by "Igor Drobiazko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Igor Drobiazko reassigned TAP5-1014:
------------------------------------
Assignee: Igor Drobiazko
> Message about missing or wrong retention policy of a marker annotation is misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-1014
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1014
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: tapestry-ioc
> Affects Versions: 5.1.0.5
> Reporter: Igor Drobiazko
> Assignee: Igor Drobiazko
> Priority: Minor
>
> Using another renetion policy policy than RUNTIME for a marker annotation leads to the following exception
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Marker annotation class org.example.Blue is not valid because it is not visible at runtime. Add a @RetentionPolicy(RUNTIME) to the class.
> at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.InternalUtils.validateMarkerAnnotation(InternalUtils.java:698)
> at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.InternalUtils.validateMarkerAnnotations(InternalUtils.java:703)
> at org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.ServiceBinderImpl.withMarker(ServiceBinderImpl.java:292)
> A proper mesage is:
> Add a @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) to the class.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.