You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> on 2013/09/04 15:25:22 UTC
Fwd: public-ldp-patch list created
I wonder if we should put the cat amongst the pigeons and submit RDF
patch as a W3C member submission.
Andy
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: public-ldp-patch list created
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:10:42 +0000
Resent-From: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 20:10:33 -0400
From: Sandro Hawke <sa...@w3.org>
To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, Tim Berners-Lee <ti...@w3.org>
As discussed at the last telecon (ACTION-92), I created
public-ldp-patch@w3.org
To subscribe yourself, use this link:
subscribe to this list
<mailto:public-ldp-patch-request@w3.org?subject=subscribe>
that is, send mail with the subject "subscribe" to
public-ldp-patch-request@w3.org
I'm writing a summary of issues to send shortly. When you join, you
should probably look at what's been sent already (if anything):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-patch/
The list is open to everyone, but of course we expect usual w3c
decorum. Also, any technical contributions from non-ldp-WG members need
to be handled was some care due to IPR concerns.
-- Sandro
Re: public-ldp-patch list created
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 04/09/13 18:25, Rob Vesse wrote:
> Perhaps, I only have so much energy to follow the machinations of W3C
> working groups so am unsure where things have got to with the linked data
> platform PATCH discussions.
I haven't had time and so have had to drop out of the activity of the WG.
"Submission" is a way of getting it on the record/radar. It does not
equate to action.
>
> Right now the archive of this new list is empty so I assume past
> discussions are in the main LDP mailing lists?
Yes - I think it was created a few days ago after an extra meeting the
LDP-WG held with TimBL. Looks like PATCH was identified as a high
priority matter (I'm doing off misc emails I've bumped into - I wasn't
at the meeting).
Andy
>
> Rob
>
>
> On 9/4/13 6:25 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> I wonder if we should put the cat amongst the pigeons and submit RDF
>> patch as a W3C member submission.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: public-ldp-patch list created
>> Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:10:42 +0000
>> Resent-From: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
>> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 20:10:33 -0400
>> From: Sandro Hawke <sa...@w3.org>
>> To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, Tim Berners-Lee <ti...@w3.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> As discussed at the last telecon (ACTION-92), I created
>> public-ldp-patch@w3.org
>>
>> To subscribe yourself, use this link:
>>
>> subscribe to this list
>> <mailto:public-ldp-patch-request@w3.org?subject=subscribe>
>>
>> that is, send mail with the subject "subscribe" to
>> public-ldp-patch-request@w3.org
>>
>> I'm writing a summary of issues to send shortly. When you join, you
>> should probably look at what's been sent already (if anything):
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-patch/
>>
>> The list is open to everyone, but of course we expect usual w3c
>> decorum. Also, any technical contributions from non-ldp-WG members need
>> to be handled was some care due to IPR concerns.
>>
>> -- Sandro
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: public-ldp-patch list created
Posted by Rob Vesse <rv...@yarcdata.com>.
Perhaps, I only have so much energy to follow the machinations of W3C
working groups so am unsure where things have got to with the linked data
platform PATCH discussions.
Right now the archive of this new list is empty so I assume past
discussions are in the main LDP mailing lists?
Rob
On 9/4/13 6:25 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>I wonder if we should put the cat amongst the pigeons and submit RDF
>patch as a W3C member submission.
>
> Andy
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: public-ldp-patch list created
>Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:10:42 +0000
>Resent-From: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
>Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 20:10:33 -0400
>From: Sandro Hawke <sa...@w3.org>
>To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, Tim Berners-Lee <ti...@w3.org>
>
>
>
>As discussed at the last telecon (ACTION-92), I created
>public-ldp-patch@w3.org
>
>To subscribe yourself, use this link:
>
>subscribe to this list
><mailto:public-ldp-patch-request@w3.org?subject=subscribe>
>
>that is, send mail with the subject "subscribe" to
>public-ldp-patch-request@w3.org
>
>I'm writing a summary of issues to send shortly. When you join, you
>should probably look at what's been sent already (if anything):
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-patch/
>
>The list is open to everyone, but of course we expect usual w3c
>decorum. Also, any technical contributions from non-ldp-WG members need
>to be handled was some care due to IPR concerns.
>
> -- Sandro
>
>
>