You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Daniel Quinlan <qu...@pathname.com> on 2004/11/22 05:18:53 UTC

Re: svn commit: r106135 - /spamassassin/trunk/rules/20_head_tests.cf /spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf

jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) writes:

> btw, would a name prefix sound like a good idea for a convention to
> indicate "rules that exist to catch never-seen-in-the-wild spammer
> exploits"?  Something like "EVIL" or similar?

*shrug*

"EVIL" sounds good, but I don't care too much.

We do see these a bit:
 
  0.044   0.0537   0.0000    1.000   0.54    2.50  MISSING_HB_SEP
  0.003   0.0030   0.0015    0.671   0.46    2.50  HEAD_LONG
  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.46    0.01  T_FRAGMENTED_MESSAGE

There are probably a few others that fall into this category.

-- 
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/