You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Dan Becker <da...@gmail.com> on 2009/01/23 17:39:29 UTC

[2.x] Build issues

First, a word of congratulations to the developers heavily involved in 
the 2.x bring up. I was able to build with minor issues (as expected), 
but I was happy to be able to run and modify the calculator test case 
and several others from command line with Maven.

I do see the following build failure (from "mvn install"):
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM).


Project ID: org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-maven-osgi-junit

Reason: POM 'org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-maven-osgi-junit' not found 
in repository: Unable to download the artifact from any repository

   org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-maven-osgi-junit:pom:2.0-SNAPSHOT

Anyone else seeing such an error? Is this expected for now?

-- 
Thanks, Dan Becker

Re: [2.x] Build issues

Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
The maven-osgi-junit plugin is missed out from the build. I just added it under r737113. Please try again.

Thanks,
Raymond


From: Simon Laws 
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:43 AM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [2.x] Build issues





On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Dan Becker <da...@gmail.com> wrote:

  First, a word of congratulations to the developers heavily involved in the 2.x bring up. I was able to build with minor issues (as expected), but I was happy to be able to run and modify the calculator test case and several others from command line with Maven.

  I do see the following build failure (from "mvn install"):
  [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
  [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM).


  Project ID: org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-maven-osgi-junit

  Reason: POM 'org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-maven-osgi-junit' not found in repository: Unable to download the artifact from any repository

   org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-maven-osgi-junit:pom:2.0-SNAPSHOT

  Anyone else seeing such an error? Is this expected for now?

  -- 
  Thanks, Dan Becker


Hi Dan

I think you need to go an build the tuscany-maven-osgi-junit plugin in the tools folder. Maybe it's not in the build as Raymond has been looking to see if it's possible to run JUnit tests completely within a OSGi environment. The calculator-osgi sample is the one that tests this. It looks like that is in the build. So we either need to add the tooling or remove the sample. I'll let Raymond comment. 

Simon

Re: [2.x] Build issues

Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Dan Becker <da...@gmail.com> wrote:

> First, a word of congratulations to the developers heavily involved in the
> 2.x bring up. I was able to build with minor issues (as expected), but I was
> happy to be able to run and modify the calculator test case and several
> others from command line with Maven.
>
> I do see the following build failure (from "mvn install"):
> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM).
>
>
> Project ID: org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-maven-osgi-junit
>
> Reason: POM 'org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-maven-osgi-junit' not found in
> repository: Unable to download the artifact from any repository
>
>  org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-maven-osgi-junit:pom:2.0-SNAPSHOT
>
> Anyone else seeing such an error? Is this expected for now?
>
> --
> Thanks, Dan Becker
>

Hi Dan

I think you need to go an build the tuscany-maven-osgi-junit plugin in the
tools folder. Maybe it's not in the build as Raymond has been looking to see
if it's possible to run JUnit tests completely within a OSGi environment.
The calculator-osgi sample is the one that tests this. It looks like that is
in the build. So we either need to add the tooling or remove the sample.
I'll let Raymond comment.

Simon