You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Irina <ir...@nas.net> on 2006/01/12 21:36:17 UTC
SURBL
Hello everybody again.
Here is my other issue I found. I can not find any of SURBL in spam
reports. I am looking for this exact string SURBL (may be I am wrong?).
Spamassassin -D --lint shows the module is installed
[53711] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[53711] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.55
local.cf has
skip_rbl_checks 0
not sure if this is required for Net::DNS?
Not sure where else to look. Please help.
Thank you very much.
Irina
===========================
Re: SURBL
Posted by Irina <ir...@nas.net>.
Thank you.
We catch so many now I see in scores.
Irina
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Kettler" <mk...@evi-inc.com>
To: "Irina" <ir...@nas.net>
Cc: <us...@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: SURBL
> Irina wrote:
> > Thank you Matt and Leonardo,
> >
> > Oh, noooo. I checked about everything, but not this file. I am missing
it
> > there. I am afraid I don't have the original file and will have to find
in
> > a TAR file.
>
> Yes, you NEED init.pre.
>
> Also, if you're using SA 3.1.0 you'll need v310.pre.
>
> (In SA 3.1.0 you can't even use the AWL without it's loadplugin in
v310.pre)
>
>
>
Re: SURBL
Posted by Jeff Chan <je...@surbl.org>.
I forgot to add, if you're processing more than 100k messages per
day, then you should probably apply for rsync access to the SURBL
zone files and serve them up locally:
http://www3.surbl.org/rsync-signup.html
That too will improve performance.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:jeffc@surbl.org
http://www.surbl.org/
Re: SURBL
Posted by Jeff Chan <je...@surbl.org>.
On Friday, January 13, 2006, 10:12:40 AM, Irina Irina wrote:
> Hello Matt and all,
> I enabled SURBL checks on a secondary server yesterday. It catches spam so
> great that I like it very much.
> Today I enabled it on our main server... Queue started to grow, messages
> were piling up. I had to revert back, queue then went down gradually.
> Compared on both servers with
> spamassassin -D --lint
> and did not notice too big difference in time (thought it would take much
> longer on the main server).
> Do I need to have this in local
> skip_rbl_checks 0
> to hit SURBL checks? Or only loadplugin
> Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL?
I believe you need both, however skip_rbl_checks 0 enables all
the RBL tests, not just SURBLs.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/rules/20_dnsbl_tests.cf
If you were previously not using RBL tests and only want to use
SURBLs, then you can give zero scores to the other RBL tests.
That may save some processing time, if it lowers your scores
somewhat.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/rules/50_scores.cf
score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0 1.332 0 1.558
score RCVD_IN_DSBL 0 1.801 0 2.600
score RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED 0 -1.825 0 -2.200
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_CGI 0 # n=1 n=3
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 0 1.713 0 1.946
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_MULTI 0 # n=1 n=3
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY 0 0.327 0 0.721
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY 0
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM 0 1.905 0 2.775
score RCVD_IN_SBL 0 2.712 0 3.160
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK 0 # n=1 n=3
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0 1.988 0 2.046
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP 0
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC 0
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP 0 0 0 0.201
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS 0 1.823 0 2.159
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB 0 1.236 0 1.456
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_ZOMBIE 0 0.240 0 0.258
score RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS 0 1.811 0 2.430
score RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID 0 2.151 0 2.234
score RCVD_IN_XBL 0 3.114 0 3.897
Presumably you would zero these out in the local server config
files, and not the installed configs.
Cheers,
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:jeffc@surbl.org
http://www.surbl.org/
Re: SURBL
Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@evi-inc.com>.
Irina wrote:
> Thank you Matt and Leonardo,
>
> Oh, noooo. I checked about everything, but not this file. I am missing it
> there. I am afraid I don't have the original file and will have to find in
> a TAR file.
Yes, you NEED init.pre.
Also, if you're using SA 3.1.0 you'll need v310.pre.
(In SA 3.1.0 you can't even use the AWL without it's loadplugin in v310.pre)
Re: SURBL
Posted by Irina <ir...@nas.net>.
Thank you Matt and Leonardo,
Oh, noooo. I checked about everything, but not this file. I am missing it
there. I am afraid I don't have the original file and will have to find in
a TAR file.
If I have posted this messages to the list before..... would save my time.
Thank you very much.
Irina
===========================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Kettler" <mk...@evi-inc.com>
To: "Irina" <ir...@nas.net>
Cc: <us...@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: SURBL
> Irina wrote:
> > Hello everybody again.
> >
> > Here is my other issue I found. I can not find any of SURBL in spam
> > reports. I am looking for this exact string SURBL (may be I am wrong?).
> >
> > Spamassassin -D --lint shows the module is installed
> > [53711] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
> > [53711] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.55
> >
> > local.cf has
> > skip_rbl_checks 0
> > not sure if this is required for Net::DNS?
> >
> > Not sure where else to look. Please help.
>
> Check your init.pre for:
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
>
Re: SURBL
Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@evi-inc.com>.
Irina wrote:
> Hello everybody again.
>
> Here is my other issue I found. I can not find any of SURBL in spam
> reports. I am looking for this exact string SURBL (may be I am wrong?).
>
> Spamassassin -D --lint shows the module is installed
> [53711] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
> [53711] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.55
>
> local.cf has
> skip_rbl_checks 0
> not sure if this is required for Net::DNS?
>
> Not sure where else to look. Please help.
Check your init.pre for:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
Re: SURBL
Posted by Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães <le...@solutti.com.br>.
Irina escreveu:
>Hello everybody again.
>
>Here is my other issue I found. I can not find any of SURBL in spam
>reports. I am looking for this exact string SURBL (may be I am wrong?).
>
>Spamassassin -D --lint shows the module is installed
> [53711] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
> [53711] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.55
>
>local.cf has
> skip_rbl_checks 0
>not sure if this is required for Net::DNS?
>
>
>
Maybe you're looking for the wrong string.
[vscan@ns1 vscan]$ spamassassin --lint -D 2>&1 | grep URIDNS -i
[2864] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL from @INC
[2864] dbg: plugin: registered
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x926047c)
[2864] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x926047c)
implements 'parsed_metadata'
[2864] dbg: uridnsbl: domains to query:
[2864] dbg: plugin: registering glue method for check_uridnsbl
(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x926047c))
[2864] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x926047c)
implements 'check_tick'
[2864] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x926047c)
implements 'check_post_dnsbl'
[vscan@ns1 vscan]$
--
Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br
Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertrudes@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it