You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com> on 2020/12/08 16:01:13 UTC
[VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control MirrorMaker 2
internal topics naming convention
Hi everyone,
I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability to control
internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
Please vote in this thread.
Thanks
Omnia
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Mickael Maison <mi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
While reviewing the PR (https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11220) we
decided to adjust some of the method names of ReplicationPolicy to
better match the actual topic names.
You can see the changes in
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=165227180&selectedPageVersions=17&selectedPageVersions=16
Let us know if you have any feedback.
Thanks
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:05 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks, everyone for the feedback and votes. I'm closing the vote with:
>
> - 3 +1 (binding) votes from Mickael, Gwen and David
>
>
> - 4 +1 (non-binding) votes from Ryanne, Igor, Lopo and Josep
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:31 AM David Jacot <dj...@confluent.io.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP, Omnia.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:42 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Can I get one last +1 binding for this KIP, please?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 5:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Gwen.
> > > > Can I get one more +1 binding for the KIP?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 2:51 AM Gwen Shapira <gwen@confluent.io.invalid
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 (binding). Thank you for your patience and clear explanations,
> > Omnia.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:39 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Bumping up this voting thread.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:57 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > > o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hi,
> > > >> > > Can I get 2 more +1 binding for this KIP?
> > > >> > > Thanks
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:14 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > > o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> Hi All,
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if we can
> > > >> form a
> > > >> > >> consensus around this.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Thanks
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Mickael Maison <
> > > >> > mickael.maison@gmail.com>
> > > >> > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>> +1 (binding)
> > > >> > >>> Thanks for the KIP!
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez
> > > <soarez@apple.com.invalid
> > > >> >
> > > >> > >>> wrote:
> > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > >>> > Another +1 here, also non-binding.
> > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > >>> > Thank you Omnia!
> > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > >>> > --
> > > >> > >>> > Igor
> > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > >>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
> > > >> > >>> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks!
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > > >> > o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > > >> > >>> wrote:
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>> > >> Hi
> > > >> > >>> > >> Can I get a vote on this, please?
> > > >> > >>> > >>
> > > >> > >>> > >> Best
> > > >> > >>> > >> Omnia
> > > >> > >>> > >>
> > > >> > >>> > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > > >> > >>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > > >> > >>> > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >>> > >>
> > > >> > >>> > >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can
> > find
> > > >> it
> > > >> > >>> here
> > > >> > >>> > >>>
> > > >> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
> > > >> > >>> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > > >> > >>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > > >> > >>> > >>> wrote:
> > > >> > >>> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> > >>>> Hi everyone,
> > > >> > >>> > >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the
> > > ability
> > > >> to
> > > >> > >>> control
> > > >> > >>> > >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details
> > are
> > > >> here
> > > >> > >>> > >>>>
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
> > > >> > >>> > >>>>
> > > >> > >>> > >>>> Please vote in this thread.
> > > >> > >>> > >>>> Thanks
> > > >> > >>> > >>>> Omnia
> > > >> > >>> > >>>>
> > > >> > >>> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Gwen Shapira
> > > >> Engineering Manager | Confluent
> > > >> 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > >> Follow us: Twitter | blog
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>.
Thanks, everyone for the feedback and votes. I'm closing the vote with:
- 3 +1 (binding) votes from Mickael, Gwen and David
- 4 +1 (non-binding) votes from Ryanne, Igor, Lopo and Josep
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:31 AM David Jacot <dj...@confluent.io.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP, Omnia.
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:42 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Can I get one last +1 binding for this KIP, please?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 5:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Gwen.
> > > Can I get one more +1 binding for the KIP?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 2:51 AM Gwen Shapira <gwen@confluent.io.invalid
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (binding). Thank you for your patience and clear explanations,
> Omnia.
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:39 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Bumping up this voting thread.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:57 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi,
> > >> > > Can I get 2 more +1 binding for this KIP?
> > >> > > Thanks
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:14 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com
> > >> >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Hi All,
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if we can
> > >> form a
> > >> > >> consensus around this.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Thanks
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Mickael Maison <
> > >> > mickael.maison@gmail.com>
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>> +1 (binding)
> > >> > >>> Thanks for the KIP!
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez
> > <soarez@apple.com.invalid
> > >> >
> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > Another +1 here, also non-binding.
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > Thank you Omnia!
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > --
> > >> > >>> > Igor
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> >
> > >> > >>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
> > >> > >>> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks!
> > >> > >>> > >
> > >> > >>> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > >> > o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > >> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >>> > >
> > >> > >>> > >> Hi
> > >> > >>> > >> Can I get a vote on this, please?
> > >> > >>> > >>
> > >> > >>> > >> Best
> > >> > >>> > >> Omnia
> > >> > >>> > >>
> > >> > >>> > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > >> > >>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > >> > >>> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>> > >>
> > >> > >>> > >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can
> find
> > >> it
> > >> > >>> here
> > >> > >>> > >>>
> > >> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
> > >> > >>> > >>>
> > >> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > >> > >>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > >> > >>> > >>> wrote:
> > >> > >>> > >>>
> > >> > >>> > >>>> Hi everyone,
> > >> > >>> > >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the
> > ability
> > >> to
> > >> > >>> control
> > >> > >>> > >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details
> are
> > >> here
> > >> > >>> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
> > >> > >>> > >>>>
> > >> > >>> > >>>> Please vote in this thread.
> > >> > >>> > >>>> Thanks
> > >> > >>> > >>>> Omnia
> > >> > >>> > >>>>
> > >> > >>> > >>>
> > >> > >>> > >
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Gwen Shapira
> > >> Engineering Manager | Confluent
> > >> 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > >> Follow us: Twitter | blog
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by David Jacot <dj...@confluent.io.INVALID>.
+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP, Omnia.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:42 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Can I get one last +1 binding for this KIP, please?
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 5:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Gwen.
> > Can I get one more +1 binding for the KIP?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 2:51 AM Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding). Thank you for your patience and clear explanations, Omnia.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:39 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Bumping up this voting thread.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:57 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > > Can I get 2 more +1 binding for this KIP?
> >> > > Thanks
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:14 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Hi All,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if we can
> >> form a
> >> > >> consensus around this.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thanks
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Mickael Maison <
> >> > mickael.maison@gmail.com>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> +1 (binding)
> >> > >>> Thanks for the KIP!
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez
> <soarez@apple.com.invalid
> >> >
> >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > Another +1 here, also non-binding.
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > Thank you Omnia!
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > --
> >> > >>> > Igor
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
> >> > >>> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks!
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <
> >> > o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > >> Hi
> >> > >>> > >> Can I get a vote on this, please?
> >> > >>> > >>
> >> > >>> > >> Best
> >> > >>> > >> Omnia
> >> > >>> > >>
> >> > >>> > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> >> > >>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> >> > >>> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>> > >>
> >> > >>> > >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find
> >> it
> >> > >>> here
> >> > >>> > >>>
> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
> >> > >>> > >>>
> >> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> >> > >>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> >> > >>> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >>> > >>>
> >> > >>> > >>>> Hi everyone,
> >> > >>> > >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the
> ability
> >> to
> >> > >>> control
> >> > >>> > >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are
> >> here
> >> > >>> > >>>>
> >> > >>>
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
> >> > >>> > >>>>
> >> > >>> > >>>> Please vote in this thread.
> >> > >>> > >>>> Thanks
> >> > >>> > >>>> Omnia
> >> > >>> > >>>>
> >> > >>> > >>>
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Gwen Shapira
> >> Engineering Manager | Confluent
> >> 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> >> Follow us: Twitter | blog
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>.
Can I get one last +1 binding for this KIP, please?
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 5:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Gwen.
> Can I get one more +1 binding for the KIP?
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 2:51 AM Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding). Thank you for your patience and clear explanations, Omnia.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:39 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Bumping up this voting thread.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:57 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > > Can I get 2 more +1 binding for this KIP?
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:14 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi All,
>> > >>
>> > >> Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if we can
>> form a
>> > >> consensus around this.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Mickael Maison <
>> > mickael.maison@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> +1 (binding)
>> > >>> Thanks for the KIP!
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez <soarez@apple.com.invalid
>> >
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Another +1 here, also non-binding.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Thank you Omnia!
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > --
>> > >>> > Igor
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
>> > >>> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks!
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <
>> > o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > >> Hi
>> > >>> > >> Can I get a vote on this, please?
>> > >>> > >>
>> > >>> > >> Best
>> > >>> > >> Omnia
>> > >>> > >>
>> > >>> > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
>> > >>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>> > >>
>> > >>> > >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find
>> it
>> > >>> here
>> > >>> > >>>
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
>> > >>> > >>>
>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
>> > >>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>> > >>>
>> > >>> > >>>> Hi everyone,
>> > >>> > >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability
>> to
>> > >>> control
>> > >>> > >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are
>> here
>> > >>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
>> > >>> > >>>>
>> > >>> > >>>> Please vote in this thread.
>> > >>> > >>>> Thanks
>> > >>> > >>>> Omnia
>> > >>> > >>>>
>> > >>> > >>>
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gwen Shapira
>> Engineering Manager | Confluent
>> 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
>> Follow us: Twitter | blog
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>.
Thanks Gwen.
Can I get one more +1 binding for the KIP?
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 2:51 AM Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 (binding). Thank you for your patience and clear explanations, Omnia.
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:39 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Bumping up this voting thread.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:57 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > Can I get 2 more +1 binding for this KIP?
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:14 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if we can
> form a
> > >> consensus around this.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Mickael Maison <
> > mickael.maison@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 (binding)
> > >>> Thanks for the KIP!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez <soarez@apple.com.invalid
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Another +1 here, also non-binding.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thank you Omnia!
> > >>> >
> > >>> > --
> > >>> > Igor
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
> > >>> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks!
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >> Hi
> > >>> > >> Can I get a vote on this, please?
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> Best
> > >>> > >> Omnia
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > >>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > >>> > >> wrote:
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find it
> > >>> here
> > >>> > >>>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> > >>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > >>> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>> > >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability
> to
> > >>> control
> > >>> > >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are
> here
> > >>> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
> > >>> > >>>>
> > >>> > >>>> Please vote in this thread.
> > >>> > >>>> Thanks
> > >>> > >>>> Omnia
> > >>> > >>>>
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Gwen Shapira
> Engineering Manager | Confluent
> 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> Follow us: Twitter | blog
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io.INVALID>.
+1 (binding). Thank you for your patience and clear explanations, Omnia.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:39 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Bumping up this voting thread.
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:57 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Can I get 2 more +1 binding for this KIP?
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:14 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if we can form a
> >> consensus around this.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Mickael Maison <
> mickael.maison@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>> Thanks for the KIP!
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez <so...@apple.com.invalid>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Another +1 here, also non-binding.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thank you Omnia!
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Igor
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
> >>> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks!
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <
> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> Hi
> >>> > >> Can I get a vote on this, please?
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Best
> >>> > >> Omnia
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> >>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> >>> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find it
> >>> here
> >>> > >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> >>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> >>> > >>> wrote:
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>> > >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability to
> >>> control
> >>> > >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are here
> >>> > >>>>
> >>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
> >>> > >>>>
> >>> > >>>> Please vote in this thread.
> >>> > >>>> Thanks
> >>> > >>>> Omnia
> >>> > >>>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >
> >>>
> >>
>
--
Gwen Shapira
Engineering Manager | Confluent
650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
Follow us: Twitter | blog
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Josep Prat <jo...@aiven.io.INVALID>.
Thanks for the KIP!
+1 (non-binding) from my side!
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 2:22 PM lobo xu <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1，I think that's a good idea. When we use MirrorMaker2, we do not want
> subject name conversion to occur. Hopefully there is a switch that can be
> configured.
>
> > 在 2021年7月27日，06:38，Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com> 写道：
> >
> > Bumping up this voting thread.
>
>
--
Josep Prat
*Aiven Deutschland GmbH*
Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin
Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
*m:* +491715557497
*w:* aiven.io
*e:* josep.prat@aiven.io
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by lobo xu <we...@gmail.com>.
+1，I think that's a good idea. When we use MirrorMaker2, we do not want subject name conversion to occur. Hopefully there is a switch that can be configured.
> 在 2021年7月27日，06:38，Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Bumping up this voting thread.
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>.
Bumping up this voting thread.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:57 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> Can I get 2 more +1 binding for this KIP?
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:14 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if we can form a
>> consensus around this.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Mickael Maison <mi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> Thanks for the KIP!
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez <so...@apple.com.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Another +1 here, also non-binding.
>>> >
>>> > Thank you Omnia!
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Igor
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
>>> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks!
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Hi
>>> > >> Can I get a vote on this, please?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Best
>>> > >> Omnia
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
>>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find it
>>> here
>>> > >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
>>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
>>> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>> Hi everyone,
>>> > >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability to
>>> control
>>> > >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are here
>>> > >>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Please vote in this thread.
>>> > >>>> Thanks
>>> > >>>> Omnia
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Can I get 2 more +1 binding for this KIP?
Thanks
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:14 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if we can form a
> consensus around this.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Mickael Maison <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>> Thanks for the KIP!
>>
>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez <so...@apple.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Another +1 here, also non-binding.
>> >
>> > Thank you Omnia!
>> >
>> > --
>> > Igor
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
>> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks!
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi
>> > >> Can I get a vote on this, please?
>> > >>
>> > >> Best
>> > >> Omnia
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find it here
>> > >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
>> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> Hi everyone,
>> > >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability to
>> control
>> > >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are here
>> > >>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Please vote in this thread.
>> > >>>> Thanks
>> > >>>> Omnia
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>.
Hi All,
Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if we can form a
consensus around this.
Thanks
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Mickael Maison <mi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Thanks for the KIP!
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez <so...@apple.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >
> > Another +1 here, also non-binding.
> >
> > Thank you Omnia!
> >
> > --
> > Igor
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
> > > +1 (non-binding), thanks!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi
> > >> Can I get a vote on this, please?
> > >>
> > >> Best
> > >> Omnia
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find it here
> > >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <
> o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability to
> control
> > >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are here
> > >>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please vote in this thread.
> > >>>> Thanks
> > >>>> Omnia
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Mickael Maison <mi...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Igor Soarez <so...@apple.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Another +1 here, also non-binding.
>
> Thank you Omnia!
>
> --
> Igor
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding), thanks!
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >> Can I get a vote on this, please?
> >>
> >> Best
> >> Omnia
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find it here
> >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability to control
> >>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are here
> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
> >>>>
> >>>> Please vote in this thread.
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> Omnia
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Igor Soarez <so...@apple.com.INVALID>.
Another +1 here, also non-binding.
Thank you Omnia!
--
Igor
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), thanks!
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> Can I get a vote on this, please?
>>
>> Best
>> Omnia
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find it here
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability to control
>>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are here
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
>>>>
>>>> Please vote in this thread.
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Omnia
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Ryanne Dolan <ry...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding), thanks!
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 4:31 AM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
> Can I get a vote on this, please?
>
> Best
> Omnia
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find it here
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability to control
>>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are here
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
>>>
>>> Please vote in this thread.
>>> Thanks
>>> Omnia
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>.
Hi
Can I get a vote on this, please?
Best
Omnia
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find it here
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability to control
>> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are here
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
>>
>> Please vote in this thread.
>> Thanks
>> Omnia
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control
MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention
Posted by Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>.
If anyone interested in reading the discussions you can find it here
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg113373.html
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:01 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I’m proposing a new KIP for MirrorMaker 2 to add the ability to control
> internal topics naming convention. The proposal details are here
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-690%3A+Add+additional+configuration+to+control+MirrorMaker+2+internal+topics+naming+convention
>
> Please vote in this thread.
> Thanks
> Omnia
>